ADVERTISEMENT

O’Boy - Clawback of USAID $

The only question is whether it was lawful to take it back. If it was.. good. Should have never been allocated. If it was taken back unlawfully, that is always wrong.
I think you have done a good job of outlining the 2 arguments at play here; one grounded in facts and one in opinion:

Factual argument: was it properly allocated by Congress in the budget voted on and signed by the executive branch? If yes, no reason or authority to claw it back without congressional approval (there is a process to do so, but "regulations" are the enemy of this admin). If no, clawback is necessary as it was not congressionally approved and would qualify for the new phrase "waste fraud and abuse".

Opinion argument: should it have been allocated in the first place? Irrelevant to the discussion here re: clawback and should be reserved for another debate about what's in the budget; this is where opinions are hashed out. If it was approved by Congress, our opinion on it after the fact means nothing other than we should hold our reps accountable at the ballot box.

Alot of folks seem to be conflating these 2 arguments. I see them as separate issues; looks like you do as well.
  • Like
Reactions: TivoliDawg

AOC

I’d hardly call an expedited removal proceeding a legit legal proceeding. I’m aware it happens, but it’s more for show than anything. Regardless, how does this argue that non-citizens have a right to be in this country illegally? How can you argue that anyone can come into our country illegally and the has a right to stay without being deported? Just doesn’t make sense.
Nobody is making the argument that it protects their ability to stay here illegally. But if they are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, they have rights. You may not like it, but that’s the entire point, isn’t it?

King of Jordan just agreed


Netanyahu had a list of 7 countries in North Africa and the middle east who were ripe for "regime change" and "nation building" in the late 1990s,.. the leading neocon think tanks in the USA at that time agreed but they had to wait for it to be implemented during the Bush/Cheney admin

The plan was for the USA to do the dirty work

Israel sent zero resources to help a 20 year fight in Afghanistan. And Israel sent zero resources towards a 10 plus year fight in iraq by americans.

After all, they Israel is/was our greatest ally
Unbelievable that they knew that Bush/Cheney would be the next US admin even in the 90s. So smart the Israeli's are able to see into the future. Probably why they also gave a list of the 19 names of the 9/11 terrorists to the US a month before 9/11 happened. So yea, they gave zero resources. Did not help at all.

They did not send troops, which was partly by US design. The US knew that if IDF was fighting in the Muslim countries, it would create all hell and chaos in the ME.

And great link you sent that doesn't go anywhere except for an error. I'm sure it is filled with proper true information. Like how Netanyahu is the biggest warmonger of his generation cause he somehow proposed preemtive on Libya and Iraq after 9/11 when not only was he not PM of Israel, but he was not in govt at all. You seem to be very highly informed on the topic. Haven't you also claimed (falsely of course) that the ADL and AIPAC are foreign organizations?

I am extremely excited for your next highly intellectual highly truthful post on this subject!
  • Haha
Reactions: jdwalker

State Dept to purchase 400M for armored Cybertrucks

The Trump/Musk regime saw they stepped in it with the state department announcement, so they walked it back. But let’s focus for a minute on the bigger picture.

The four agencies that DOGE has targeted from the outset tell a clear story — not about cutting government waste but about making Elon Musk richer.

I want to explain how this is all connected, so let’s go through it.

First, he went after USAID because he knew China would benefit more than anyone. Who depends on China for their own financial benefit? Elon Musk who makes and sources his car parts from China. He also has dozens of outstanding regulatory issues in China. He makes China happy by destroying USAID, and he’s greased the wheels for himself and his business.

Musk targeted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the agency created after the 2008 financial crash to protect consumers from fraud and abuse. It’s helped return $21 billion to working people that were ripped off. But recently, Musk has said he wants to set up a new global payment app on Twitter. What agency would protect consumers from abuse in that system? CFPB. So he destroys it.

DOGE targeted the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Right now, the NLRB has 20 open cases against Tesla for union busting. What happens if it functionally does not exist? There’s no accountability for Musk when he and his team try to stop their workers from organizing for better working conditions and protections. And I think the past month is pretty good evidence for why workers need protection from a retaliatory megalomaniac billionaire like Musk.

He’s also targeted the Treasury Department — gaining full access to the government’s payment system. How convenient is that for someone trying to build their own global payment app? He can research competitors and rivals and maybe even add them to the “Do Not Pay” list, a classified list of companies that cannot receive funds from the Treasury.

If Elon Musk succeeds in wiping out even just those four agencies, he and his billionaire cronies are going to make a ton of money off that.
  • Like
Reactions: Double Bogey Dawg
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT