An argument could be made - that coaching this team without a QB and your stud RB - to a 9-3 record

[RedNBlackNtheDay]

Was an act of brilliance?

 

[WillieG]

Take a look at the teams in the top 10 playing without their starting qb and then rethink that statement. The sad thing is that we didn't lose a qb to injury, this is the group we came to the dance with. Yes we lost Chubb, but all I was hearing at the beginning of the season is that this was the most talented backfield group in all of college football playing behind an offensive line that was one of the best as well. How did that work out? This wasn't an act of brilliance, it was a schedule that in hindsight was very soft and the only teams that were competitive were the ones we lost to. A win against our rival is great but Tech was 3-8 coming in to that game. And we still couldn't separate from them.

 

[Renegade_Dog]

Tell that to Alabama

 

[dieharddawg62]

We didn't beat a team that was over 500. There is nothing brilliant about beating bad teams. No one in the SEC east has won SECCG since 2008. The division sucks and we still can't win it.

 

[gawga_dawg]

We didn't beat a team that was over 500. There is nothing brilliant about beating bad teams. No one in the SEC east has won SECCG since 2008. The division sucks and we still can't win it.

Not to mention we often struggled and looked poor against the bad teams. It would be different if we crushed all the bad teams and lost close competitive games with Bama and Florida, but we didn't.

As for having no QB, that's also Richt and the coaching staff's fault.