Abuse allegations. Next it is the clowns. The lib idiots can say they destroyed the circus!
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted from Rivals Mobile
B and B circus getting rid of elephant act due to
- Thread starter ugateke24
- Start date
Would like to get rid of that AssClown in the WH....*
POS
POS
Why would anybody think it's ok to abuse animals for amusement ?
I think Costa Rica was right in banning zoos, not wild life refuges, just caging animals to be gawked at by sociopathic idiots.
We should ban keeping whales in tanks where they have to swim in circles with their tails bent their entire lives as well.
Why is it people who identify as ''conservative'' are always on the wrong side when it comes to improving our humanity ?
Sure they do. Let's put you in a cage and beat you with a steel bar so you'll dance for our amusement.
Hey, if they just stuck a vacuum to their heads and sucked their brains out it would be OK then?
Its OK to suck the brains out of humans, but not care for elephants....... hmmmmm
Give it a f..ing rest Are you saying as long as there are abortions we should torture animals ?
No, I just get tired of the organizations that support killing human babies spend so much time defending, what is in most cases, the excellent care that animals receive in captivity.
A man or woman will scream about how a human life should be ended because of the situation they will be in when born...... yet don't suggest the same thing with animals who live in the wild and get eaten by each other or shot by a hunter for food.
We are suppose to somehow honor their existence as a creature of God......
Animals that is. Not human babies.......
You give it a rest. You can't have it both ways then tell the other side to shut up and "give it a rest".
If you added up all the elephants kept in captivity, whether in a zoo or circus, since elephants were created, it would pale in comparison to the nearly 70,000,000 destruction of human babies in the U.S. alone since 1973. 70,000,000 million lives erased for the convenience of irresponsible and immature adults.
You give it a rest there cowboy.
probably about time for that.....there's enough at the circus without trotting a poor captive elephant out there for no good reason
Let's put your ass in a cage, beat you with sticks and see how you like it.
It's ridiculous to pretend there's some connection between those who support abortions and animal rights activist. I'll go so far as to call it dishonest of you.
Go down the line of the following supporters
PETA
Planned Parenthood
Gay rights groups
Abortion rights groups
Socialist Organizations
Communist organizations
Anti religion groups
Immigration amnesty groups
The general media
Hollywood
Why would they all agree on the political party to support and why do a these ideologies pool together?
Tell me that it isn't spiritual. Tell me how all these tie together ?
They don't ''pool together'', that's silly nonsensical rhetoric.
It does tell me how f--d up the republican party is in how THEY lump such diverse groups together though.
You're not the most original or thoughtful poster, but I give you an A for lame persistence.
Yeah, you're like the guy who says ''I'm an excellent driver'' 100 times a day, impressive.
This has been one of the most interesting post that I have seen. Some of the responses below are amazing for a sports vent. It certainly takes you away from our coaching situation. I am home recovering from brain surgery and appreciate the entertainment.
I agree with pottimus, why is it ok to murder a defenseless fetus, but scream outrage over animal treatment? I do not think animals should be abused,but a fetus sure as hell deserves more protection than said animals.
Yeah we are really civilized killing over 70 million humans and acting like it is fine to do so.
That is a made up argument. Who is advocating for abortion AND humane treatment of animals ? If you know that person, go run it by them.
It's like asking why prosecute assaults when people are murdered every day.
It's ridiculous to conflate the 2, that we might agree on, it's a false argument to suggest we should ignore animal abuse because of other issues. How about abuse in nursing homes, should we ignore that till Roe vs Wade is overturned ?
No one ever said that. No one said to ignore animal abuse because of other issues. Jenkins didn't. Sept didn't. I didn't.
Again, you ignore any factual and logical conversation because, I guess, you have no reply other than republicans are bad.
I asked why these seeming unrelated groups all support the same ideology. You have no answer.
These groups don't create jobs or stimulate the economy. They create discord and anarchy. You bash repubs, but yet that ideology, the wealthy, the businessowner, the less gov, more individual rights lobby is the group, lumped together, that promotes giving us the money to expand and hire people. Wealthy people don't bother me. The created wealth through risk of investment and employed people.
Name one socialist activist group that does that, other than to hire people to attack those who have the wealth to employ people in meaningful jobs that contribute to our financial stability.
A these groups I mentioned leave financial ruin in their wake. And they all support the progressive liberal dem party.
Heck, we elected a social activist as president.
Open to hear your dangerous groups that support the conservatives.
You are on the clock.
You tucker are a mindless,whining,uninformed POS. Your mother failed you.
Oh yes, F peta, a bunch of America hating anarchist stooges carrying out the leftist agenda.
They can all go fornicate themselves!
Of course you conflate the issues, it's what you do. All roads lead back to your political bent in your mind.
If you really think animal abuse is wrong, why act like it shouldn't be an issue until the world is otherwise to your liking ?
There goes that anger again.
What you need is a dog or some small immigrant children to kick around.
Last edited:
No I love dogs and kids (unless they are from liberal parents). Just responding in kind to a leftist attack on free speech, and now labeled a hater. Same story different day.
I am always happy to point out the deficiencies of the left (no anger here) .
I'm conservative and I have a big problem with keeping animals pinned up. It's definitely in humane.
Last edited:
Of course its all about my political bent. What is your bent?
I never said it wasn't an issue. But you know that.
I never said it shouldn't be an issue until the world is to my liking. But you know that.
But you never answered the question. You never answer any questions of substance. You only claim some kind of political conspiracy, inferring that anyone who doesn't get in line is just an ideologist.
My first point was why we get all choked up and excited about the elephant issue, yet hold our own species in such disrespect and contempt and call it a personal choice. My point, and a valid one is how a rational human being gets all teared up over an animal abuse issue and the next day has her baby's brains sucked out to get rid of the baby?
My second point was to list groups that are seemingly unrelated, and question why they all pull together under one political agenda.
You never gave any intellectual discussion on either question. You just say I have a political bent. Yet you can't give a valid reason why those groups support each other. And give no intellectual response on the groups that seem to support liberal politics.
If you have a pet, you really have no say in the issue anyway. Hopefully you are willing to forego keeping a helpless dog or cat in captivity and abusing them. Goldfish? Hamster? You know, all those little creatures that hate mongering rich people sell to unsuspecting people.
I would bet you eat meat. Which makes you a sick human being by PETA standards. But you eat it because of choice.
I would bet you drive a gas powered car. Which makes you a sick human being by green standards. But you drive, ride buses and planes that use fossil fuels every single day for your convenience and choice. And the rubber left on the roads every single mile you drive washes into our aquifer, polluting our drinking water.
Ever ridden a horse? Cruelty has no bounds.
Where do you draw the line for convenience? I am stupid for valuing the life of a human being created by and carried by a human being. I am stupid for thinking it is ridiculously stupid that the womb of the mother is the most dangerous place to live for a human baby. Not because of medical reasons, but because of bad choices and decisions by a human being and then holding the innocent responsible.
Speak up man. Give me all you got. Tell me I am wrong and we will talk about it.
Or continue to hide behind your self righteousness.
Bring it on. I have given you my "bent" and none of it is political. It is ethical. So this is where is all shakes out. I speak ethics, you speak politics. It is a great way to shut down your opponent.
I would bet that someone close to you has had an abortion, but yet, since it is an expression of self choice, you didn't get emotionally involved. Better to kill the inconvenience. It is, after all, better for the child.... even though the child was not given the same choice.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
NonDawg TV question about those dealing with older parents/relatives
- Latest: T-Town Dawg