Can Mueller get any more corrupt?

[Hoffman_rg]

Mueller gives Tony Podesta and 4 others immunity to testify against Paul Manafort while putting Manafort in solitary confinement where he can't even prepare for his upcoming trial.. Yet the esteemed Mr. Podesta was involved in the same crimes and worked as a partner with Manafort.

Also, Mr. Podesta helped lobby and broker the Uranium 1 deal. Who was Director of the FBI at the time? None other than Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein was US Attorney in Maryland. Both looked the other way on the Uranium 1 deal in spite of much corruption evidence as reported by an undercover fbi agent.
The total bias of the Mueller investigation is so obvious even Dawgfood might admit it.

 

[benchwarmerdawg]

How anyone can see what is going on and not realize how corrupt DC is and that Trump is the only ballsy enough to try and fix it. He also isn't in it for the money like the Cliptons and the Obuma's. That alone makes a big difference. For someone to not be able to see it means one of 3 things. 1. Brainwashed 2. No Brain 3. Anti America Socialist Scum.

 

[donalsonville_dawg]

Yes, poor Paul Manafort. He flagrantly violates the terms of his bond and ends up having it revoked. Then the jail - by the way, Mueller doesn't run the jail - decides to put him in solitary because it can't guarantee he would be safe otherwise.

[side note: I love that you guys show sympathy for Paul effing Manafort's plight as a criminal defendant but almost certainly give zero effs about the scores of other people who are held without bond and "can't even prepare for [their] upcoming trial." I'm really looking forward to seeing the scrutiny you guys give the Manafort prosecution to everyone else out there accused of a crime.]

[side note two: having ranted in side note one, I always preferred my clients being in jail when I practiced criminal law. It meant I knew where they were and how to reach them...]

Manafort had ample opportunity to stay out and prepare for his trial but instead he chose to try to tamper with witnesses. Let's not let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory though.

Also, I assume if there was a crime committed with Uranium 1, President Trump will make sure his DOJ gets to the bottom of it.

 

[benchwarmerdawg]

Yes, poor Paul Manafort. He flagrantly violates the terms of his bond and ends up having it revoked. Then the jail - by the way, Mueller doesn't run the jail - decides to put him in solitary because it can't guarantee he would be safe otherwise.

[side note: I love that you guys show sympathy for Paul effing Manafort's plight as a criminal defendant but almost certainly give zero effs about the scores of other people who are held without bond and "can't even prepare for [their] upcoming trial." I'm really looking forward to seeing the scrutiny you guys give the Manafort prosecution to everyone else out there accused of a crime.]

[side note two: having ranted in side note one, I always preferred my clients being in jail when I practiced criminal law. It meant I knew where they were and how to reach them...]

Manafort had ample opportunity to stay out and prepare for his trial but instead he chose to try to tamper with witnesses. Let's not let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory though.

Also, I assume if there was a crime committed with Uranium 1, President Trump will make sure his DOJ gets to the bottom of it.

good grief, I do not trust the DOJ as long as Rosenskunk is there and Sessions sux and Trump can't dump him because of the stupid left screaming obstruction. Uranium 1 was a crime. Not only was it criminal, but it shows the hypocrisy of you rino's and all the hysterical dims. While Trump could have handled the press conference differently it most definitely did not rise to the level of Uranium 1 and the 400 million dollars to the cleptons…. NOT a freaking peep from left leaning skunks about that.

 

[Hoffman_rg]

Yes, poor Paul Manafort. He flagrantly violates the terms of his bond and ends up having it revoked. Then the jail - by the way, Mueller doesn't run the jail - decides to put him in solitary because it can't guarantee he would be safe otherwise.

[side note: I love that you guys show sympathy for Paul effing Manafort's plight as a criminal defendant but almost certainly give zero effs about the scores of other people who are held without bond and "can't even prepare for [their] upcoming trial." I'm really looking forward to seeing the scrutiny you guys give the Manafort prosecution to everyone else out there accused of a crime.]

[side note two: having ranted in side note one, I always preferred my clients being in jail when I practiced criminal law. It meant I knew where they were and how to reach them...]

Manafort had ample opportunity to stay out and prepare for his trial but instead he chose to try to tamper with witnesses. Let's not let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory though.

Also, I assume if there was a crime committed with Uranium 1, President Trump will make sure his DOJ gets to the bottom of it.

Donaldson,


Being a lawyer, I would think u would want to see equal application of justice for all. Do u think that has been done here? Below are quotes from the judge that heard a motion to dismiss the case for lack of prosecutorial jurisdiction.

“Although this case will continue,” Ellis said, “those involved should be sensitive to the danger unleashed when political disagreements are transformed into partisan prosecutions". This should be obvious but apparently not to u.

Ellis added in a footnote that “even a blind person can see the true target of the special counsel’s investigation is President Trump rather than Manafort".

I admit I am a partisan DT supporter and u say u are a moderate. Yet your statements seem to always lean left.

 

[deadduckdawg]

Yes, poor Paul Manafort. He flagrantly violates the terms of his bond and ends up having it revoked. Then the jail - by the way, Mueller doesn't run the jail - decides to put him in solitary because it can't guarantee he would be safe otherwise.

[side note: I love that you guys show sympathy for Paul effing Manafort's plight as a criminal defendant but almost certainly give zero effs about the scores of other people who are held without bond and "can't even prepare for [their] upcoming trial." I'm really looking forward to seeing the scrutiny you guys give the Manafort prosecution to everyone else out there accused of a crime.]

[side note two: having ranted in side note one, I always preferred my clients being in jail when I practiced criminal law. It meant I knew where they were and how to reach them...]

Manafort had ample opportunity to stay out and prepare for his trial but instead he chose to try to tamper with witnesses. Let's not let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory though.

Also, I assume if there was a crime committed with Uranium 1, President Trump will make sure his DOJ gets to the bottom of it.

I’m glad you weren’t my lawyer when I was wrongly accused of murdering my previous lawyer because he preferred I was sitting in jail so IT WAS NO INCONVENIENCE TO HIS WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT ASS TRYING TO GET IN TOUCH WITH ME.

 

[dawgfood0612]

So you mean a prosecutor is being lenient to lower level folks in exchange for them testifying against the higher up decision makers.

Wow, I don't think that has ever been done before.

 

[easychair]

Mueller is a straight arrow, agreed to by D’s and R’s alike, remarkable track record. Absolutely no corruption wit RM.

 

[dirtytoeddawg]

So you mean a prosecutor is being lenient to lower level folks in exchange for them testifying against the higher up decision makers.

Wow, I don't think that has ever been done before.

You do understand that in Manaforts Case he is purported to have been the middle man between Ukrainian interests and the Podesta group don’t you?

This is actually giving the higher ups immunity against the lower.

Manaforts entire case stems from 2005-2014 actions and are nothing but reopened DOJ files that they previously closed.

The only difference in what Manafort was involved in and what Podesta was involved in are political affiliations and the fact that Podesta would actually lead to even higher ups on the wrong side of the aisle.

 

[Dirty Hairy Dawg]

Yes, poor Paul Manafort. He flagrantly violates the terms of his bond and ends up having it revoked. Then the jail - by the way, Mueller doesn't run the jail - decides to put him in solitary because it can't guarantee he would be safe otherwise.

[side note: I love that you guys show sympathy for Paul effing Manafort's plight as a criminal defendant but almost certainly give zero effs about the scores of other people who are held without bond and "can't even prepare for [their] upcoming trial." I'm really looking forward to seeing the scrutiny you guys give the Manafort prosecution to everyone else out there accused of a crime.]

[side note two: having ranted in side note one, I always preferred my clients being in jail when I practiced criminal law. It meant I knew where they were and how to reach them...]

Manafort had ample opportunity to stay out and prepare for his trial but instead he chose to try to tamper with witnesses. Let's not let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory though.

Also, I assume if there was a crime committed with Uranium 1, President Trump will make sure his DOJ gets to the bottom of it.

Normally, I would agree (to some extent) but the history of the server/collusion investigations are starting to show a pattern that should cause any American that believes in liberty and a somewhat honest government serious concern. The over-arching question remains if Mueller is investigating Russian activity, why aren't we hearing about people involved in proven Russian schemes where Russia got proven benes being interviewed/subpoenaed? The pattern is becoming undeniable.

First, why did RR appoint a spec counsel immediately after DT fired the man he advocating firing to run an investigation the justice dept could and should have been able to handle?

Why did RR hire a man that was close to primary witnesses?

Why did RR hire a man that had just been rejected for the position of FBI director the previous day?

Why is Paul Manafort sitting in jail and multiple HRC aids, including the guy that actually wiped the server, even though he knew it contained subpoenaed material, given immunity without any benefit to the prosecutors?

And why pray tell would a close HRC confidant and likely a bigger fish than Manafort (Podesta) that was heavily involved with Manafort be given immunity to testify in a case that was so trivial the O justice dept passed on prosecuting. If Manafort was such a menace, why didn't Mueller go after him when he was head of the FBI.

It is becoming obvious, this investigation has become an investigation in search of a crime committed by a specific individual and the prosecutors are going scorched earth against anyone close to him to get info that COULD lead to that crime. That is not how justice is supposed to work in this country, imo and looks more like a coup than a counter-intelligence investigation.

 

[Dirty Hairy Dawg]

Mueller is a straight arrow, agreed to by D’s and R’s alike, remarkable track record. Absolutely no corruption wit RM.

Why do you trust Ds or Rs. Do you not understand the reason why the hatred is SO strong by members on both sides of the aisle is because Trump threatens the methods BOTH sides use to feather their nest?

If this investigation was TRULY about foreign threats to our republic, China would be front and center. The difference, China has bought pols on both sides of the aisle and Russia doesn't have enough resources to buy all of them off.

 

[dirtytoeddawg]

Normally, I would agree (to some extent) but the history of the server/collusion investigations are starting to show a pattern that should cause any American that believes in liberty and a somewhat honest government serious concern. The over-arching question remains if Mueller is investigating Russian activity, why aren't we hearing about people involved in proven Russian schemes where Russia got proven benes being interviewed/subpoenaed? The pattern is becoming undeniable.

First, why did RR appoint a spec counsel immediately after DT fired the man he advocating firing to run an investigation the justice dept could and should have been able to handle?

Why did RR hire a man that was close to primary witnesses?

Why did RR hire a man that had just been rejected for the position of FBI director the previous day?

Why is Paul Manafort sitting in jail and multiple HRC aids, including the guy that actually wiped the server, even though he knew it contained subpoenaed material, given immunity without any benefit to the prosecutors?

And why pray tell would a close HRC confidant and likely a bigger fish than Manafort (Podesta) that was heavily involved with Manafort be given immunity to testify in a case that was so trivial the O justice dept passed on prosecuting. If Manafort was such a menace, why didn't Mueller go after him when he was head of the FBI.

It is becoming obvious, this investigation has become an investigation in search of a crime committed by a specific individual and the prosecutors are going scorched earth against anyone close to him to get info that COULD lead to that crime. That is not how justice is supposed to work in this country, imo and looks more like a coup than a counter-intelligence investigation.

What’s truly odd about the SC is they’ve been busy indicting obscure Russian intel agents & companies that they know will never see a court room, with the exception of the one Russian company that did show up & embarrass them.

Meanwhile, just this week a purported Russian agent is nabbed in the flesh, Maria Butina, who has been on the FBIs radar since 2015 floating around conservative circles. The SC had nothing to do with this case. A recently appointed US attorney made the indictments here.

 

[elderdawg]

Mueller is a straight arrow, agreed to by D’s and R’s alike, remarkable track record. Absolutely no corruption wit RM.

Not so.

Mueller has a very questionable past.

http://thehill.com/opinion/criminal...t-muellers-forgotten-surveillance-crime-spree

 

[Whosyodawgy]

Why do you trust Ds or Rs. Do you not understand the reason why the hatred is SO strong by members on both sides of the aisle is because Trump threatens the methods BOTH sides use to feather their nest?

If this investigation was TRULY about foreign threats to our republic, China would be front and center. The difference, China has bought pols on both sides of the aisle and Russia doesn't have enough resources to buy all of them off.

You are correct sir. There are very bad apples on both sides of the aisle who will work together to protect their golden goose. For instance:
1) Mitch McConnell's son, John Kerry's son and Joe Biden's son each got over $1B from the Chinese government. Joe Biden actually flew his son over to China with him on Air Force ll to cut his deal while Joe was negotiating with the Chinese on trade...talk about compromised!!
2) John McCain and John Kerry worked together to prevent the families of Viet Nam POWs from finding out the facts about the deaths and conditions under which their loved ones died. Both want all things Viet Nam buried and forgotten because both have too many unanswered questions they want to remain that way.

 

[Whosyodawgy]

Not so.

Mueller has a very questionable past.

http://thehill.com/opinion/criminal...t-muellers-forgotten-surveillance-crime-spree

Mueller was appointed because he has as much to protect from the public as any swamp creature/criminal alive. He is the perfect scumbag for the job of keeping the spotlight ANYWHERE except on the corruption of the deep state. That is why Rosenstein gave him latitude to indict people for things that have nothing to do with the election....they need constant headlines pointing in some other direction....any direction except at the unelected creatures who have become so powerful without anyone to answer to.

 

[benchwarmerdawg]

Mueller is a straight arrow, agreed to by D’s and R’s alike, remarkable track record. Absolutely no corruption wit RM.

You are ignorant and have no clue what you are talking about. Why don't you look up some facts about muller, rosenskunk et al and you will see just how misinformed and stupid you are. Why would you come here where folks that actually are informed and spout off... do you just like to prove how ill equipped you are for a meaningful life?

AS state below, D's and R's are the problem. They are all in bed with each other. They all sux.

 

[Whosyodawgy]

You are ignorant and have no clue what you are talking about. Why don't you look up some facts about muller, rosenskunk et al and you will see just how misinformed and stupid you are. Why would you come here where folks that actually are informed and spout off... do you just like to prove how ill equipped you are for a meaningful life?

AS state below, D's and R's are the problem. They are all in bed with each other. They all sux.

IGNORANT is the exact description. It is his lack of information which shapes his comment.
Mueller and Rosenstein go way back...to when Rosenstein was a US Attorney and Mueller was FBI Dir. and the illegal spying on Americans which they both must keep the lid on or risk ruin.
Man, you know they hate Peter Strzok making such a stupid mistake as using his text to discuss common everyday deep state abuse. But Lisa Page is far less culpable and will talk to save herself. That will help … unless of course she chooses to shoot herself a few times in the back of the head or she could be the victim of a random "robbery gone bad".
I am serious, If I were Trump, I would assign a Seal Team to her security.

 

[dirtytoeddawg]

Courts ordered list of those getting immunity.

Podesta is not on the list.

 

[Hoffman_rg]

Courts ordered list of those getting immunity.

Podesta is not on the list.

This is interesting.. Fox News says he was on the list and CNN doesn't show him on the list. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...mmunity-to-testify-against-paul-manafort.html

 

[dirtytoeddawg]

This is interesting.. Fox News says he was on the list and CNN doesn't show him on the list. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...mmunity-to-testify-against-paul-manafort.html

I think the mix up is that there are two different cases. One is a State case in Va, the other a federal case in DC. I think in one of the cases he very well may get some form of immunity.