ADVERTISEMENT

Can't wait to hear how all the Pubs try to discredit a decorated

RoyDawgMercer

Circle of Honor
Gold Member
Sep 4, 2001
40,393
42,300
197
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
 
Last edited:
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.

Why do you insist on showing your ignorance.

Here you go.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ar-witness-admits-protecting-the-interagency/

You dims just can't help yourself, you gun goes off half cocked, no boom, just a little snap crackle pop. LOL FOOLS>
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
animated-gif.gif
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
Don't think the Pubs will use the dems tactic of discrediting anyone that disagrees with them. Probably will just point out the obvious which is - Read The Transcript! If the Lt. Colonel says something other than what we already know, then we'll listen. My guess is this is another individual that didn't like what he heard, but his feelings do not make it a crime. - Read The Transcript! All 300 and something million people in the country can say they heard it, didn't like it, but the fact remains there wasn't a crime committed - Read The Transcript!
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
Yep, that's how the law works. We have a verbatim transcript verified by all of those agencies listening in and the judge and jury will throw out the transcript and testimony of all others listening to the call and believe this one guy over all others. The mind (or absence thereof) of a liberal never ceases to amaze me.
 
Their hero can do no wrong, see nothing wrong with using tax payer money as leverage for a foreign government to investigate a Trump opponent.

I assume that means the Trumpers would have no problems with Dems in Congress using tax dollars as pawns for foreign governments to investigate Pubs.
 
Their hero can do no wrong, see nothing wrong with using tax payer money as leverage for a foreign government to investigate a Trump opponent.

I assume that means the Trumpers would have no problems with Dems in Congress using tax dollars as pawns for foreign governments to investigate Pubs.

You investigate crimes, not people. Like it or not, there is a mountain of evidence that the Biden's were neck deep in corruption and the Ukraine has admitted they participated in the DNC scheme to dig for dirt on Trump during the 2016 cycle.

As of today, there is NO evidence the POTUS committed a crime and asking the Ukraine to investigate Biden and the DNC's 2016 activities predates Biden's candidacy. Heck, maybe someday the Soviet tactics of investigating the man will hit pay dirt but so far, it's just Dems shitting on the rule of law.
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.

LOL, How many times you going to fall for this bullshit Roy? Same people, same bullshit, same result. You get all worked up, then they let you down. Just stop for your own well-being
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
Drive by Libs strike again.....
 
Their hero can do no wrong, see nothing wrong with using tax payer money as leverage for a foreign government to investigate a Trump opponent.

I assume that means the Trumpers would have no problems with Dems in Congress using tax dollars as pawns for foreign governments to investigate Pubs.

Crazy Bernie said today if Israel didn't comply with his demands on Gaza he'd withhold funds. Quid pro quo ?? And just because a Democrat is running for President doesn't give him immunity from being a criminal. You're hatred has caused you to loose what little mind you started with. Just a pack of mindless, greedy, envious dummies. Exactly what the Democrats depend on
 
Their hero can do no wrong, see nothing wrong with using tax payer money as leverage for a foreign government to investigate a Trump opponent.

I assume that means the Trumpers would have no problems with Dems in Congress using tax dollars as pawns for foreign governments to investigate Pubs.

Baby killer strikes again with more moronic words. Just exactly what the deep state has done. All the MILLIONS and MILLIONS wasted trying to get Trump. Muller, gang, fbi, doj, all on the taxpayer dime... DO YOU CARE> HECK NO> All you care about is subverting a duly elected president of the USA. Your ignorance and your willingness to look at things so blindly and from a perverted view of all events is beyond belief. STOP with your stupidity already. As always,,,, go kill another baby and you will feel better I am sure murderer.

PS I am interested to know,,, just how does is make you feel knowing you are a murdering baby killer. You should off yourself and leave the innocent alone.
 
Their hero can do no wrong, see nothing wrong with using tax payer money as leverage for a foreign government to investigate a Trump opponent.

I assume that means the Trumpers would have no problems with Dems in Congress using tax dollars as pawns for foreign governments to investigate Pubs.


WTF do you think they're doing right now with all this impeachment bullshit? How stupid are you truly?
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.

Everything below is irrefutable, documented fact.

1) Joe Biden confession of holding aid approved by Congress hostage for Ukraine to fire the prosecutor looking into why Joe's son is sitting on the board of a gas company, with no experience, after being tossed out of the Navy for cocaine:



2) Sitting President asking a foreign leader to look into possible criminal activities by Joe and Son, demanding nothing in return:

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/25/7640...f-president-trumps-call-with-ukraine-s-leader


Expected responses from depraved liberals:

1) Silence

2) Orange man bad, or

3) But Joe is a political opponent! He cannot be prosecuted or investigated! He is exempt from the laws governing US citizens. But Orange man can be spied on for 18 months before an election, illegally, by a seditious group with a faked dossier, a group with which Joe had a working relationship as VP, then impeached by a single party behind closed doors for doing his job, with selective leaks of secret testimony taken out of context the only information publicly released.

The left is decadent, depraved and downright evil. I dare any of them to justify the well-documented contrasts of justice, real not social, set forth above.
 
You investigate crimes, not people. Like it or not, there is a mountain of evidence that the Biden's were neck deep in corruption and the Ukraine has admitted they participated in the DNC scheme to dig for dirt on Trump during the 2016 cycle.

As of today, there is NO evidence the POTUS committed a crime and asking the Ukraine to investigate Biden and the DNC's 2016 activities predates Biden's candidacy. Heck, maybe someday the Soviet tactics of investigating the man will hit pay dirt but so far, it's just Dems shitting on the rule of law.
LMAO...you just exposed the Dems for everything they have been doing for 3 years. They think that you investigate a person(Trump) until you are able to find something to charge them with. Just like Stalin. While the Pubs investigate crimes and the Dems scream bloody murder because they know it will lead to a person...namely one of them. This is awesome.
 
Just curious, do you guys support the trashing of the decorated army officer just because he was troubled by the Trump call call?

President Bone Spurs doesn’t seem to like him.
 
Just curious, do you guys support the trashing of the decorated army officer just because he was troubled by the Trump call call?

President Bone Spurs doesn’t seem to like him.

First, he is decorated for driving by an IED, based on what I read. I respect service in a combat zone, but let's not soft pedal the facts. Max Clelland made a career out of dropping a grenade in his lap while driving a supply truck.

Second, on to trashing. I don't know anything about the man personally. I have seen selectively released "snippets" of other testimonies leaked out of context, because I took the trouble to watch full testimonies, before Schitt decided things were not TV worthy and took it underground to control the agenda. I do know, as a fact, that Orange Man Bad's predecessor purged over 200 senior officers from the military, far more than any president in history. Promotion became linked with loyalty to the leftist theology. Thus, I have little trust for anyone above Captain right now, and I will be wary of what they say.

Mattis is a prime example of Obama promotions, even though he was forced out after 4 years. He was a Naval ROTC graduate from an obscure college in Washington state, worked his way to Major through the dangerous route of regional recruitment coordinator in the Marines, and his greatest combat feat was denying aid to Special Forces wounded troops in Afghanistan because "he was uncertain as to the situation". Air Force evac helicopters had to go rescue the wounded from three times further away. There is a book about it. And POTUS was right to call that self promoting, hostile fire wary SOB the most overrated general on the planet. He was an actor, not a Marine.

Oh. The USAF choppers dropped the wounded off at Mattis' base for treatment, since it was the closest to the action. He saw that he was being left out and would look bad, he now knew the situation on the ground was stable, so he proceeded to launch helicopters to go support the Spec Ops guys..........filled the wounds of the wounded with rotor dust in the process.

Since he knew the wounded were injured by errant B-52 bombs from the beginning, Mattis had no reason to withhold support. He also had no reason for his after the fact chopper launches. He simply crawled under his bunk, shat his pants, and probably wished he was back at the recruiting station. These are the leaders of our military, post-2008. God Bless the troops on the front lines. The politicians in uniform have agendas, which is what you would say if one of them spoke up for POTUS.
 
Last edited:
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
Not sure if many pubs are discrediting as of now...mostly just saying he has nothing new and or everybody has an opinion. Did Trump break the law or are u on the never trump bandwagon of impeach is our only way.
 
LOL, How many times you going to fall for this bullshit Roy? Same people, same bullshit, same result. You get all worked up, then they let you down. Just stop for your own well-being
The transcript released by the White House shows Trump committed a crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jbpayne32
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
Unless this witness provides proof that the Ukrainian government was aware their funding was being withheld, then it doesnt matter. Cant blackmail someone into doing your bidding if you never make them aware of your leverage. Other than that, its all for show. If there's no quid pro quo, the impeachment gotsta go! Now if Trump had went to the Ukrainians and asked them to drum up some fake intel and create a scathing dossier on Biden, then there would definitely be a case. and im not a "dim" or a "pub".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dogstud
Their hero can do no wrong, see nothing wrong with using tax payer money as leverage for a foreign government to investigate a Trump opponent.

I assume that means the Trumpers would have no problems with Dems in Congress using tax dollars as pawns for foreign governments to investigate Pubs.

That was the Russia hoax. 30 million of taxpayer money spent to try to bring down the democratically elected POTUS. Our intelligence agencies, FBI, Dems and media all working together even before he took the oath of office to undermine a political opponent. In comparison this whole Ukraine deal doesn’t even register on most people’s radar. You failed. But please keep it up, instead of those newly elected Dems helping to pass any legislation for those who put them in office. LOL. Trump 2020.
 
Just curious, do you guys support the trashing of the decorated army officer just because he was troubled by the Trump call call?

President Bone Spurs doesn’t seem to like him.

First, he is decorated for driving by an IED, based on what I read. I respect service in a combat zone, but let's not soft pedal the facts. Max Clelland made a career out of dropping a grenade in his lap while driving a supply truck.

Second, on to trashing. I don't know anything about the man personally. I have seen selectively released "snippets" of other testimonies leaked out of context, because I took the trouble to watch full testimonies, before Schitt decided things were not TV worthy and took it underground to control the agenda. I do know, as a fact, that Orange Man Bad's predecessor purged over 200 senior officers from the military, far more than any president in history. Promotion became linked with loyalty to the leftist theology. Thus, I have little trust for anyone above Captain right now, and I will be wary of what they say.

Mattis is a prime example of Obama promotions, even though he was forced out after 4 years. He was a Naval ROTC graduate from an obscure college in Washington state, worked his way to Major through the dangerous route of regional recruitment coordinator in the Marines, and his greatest combat feat was denying aid to Special Forces wounded troops in Afghanistan because "he was uncertain as to the situation". Air Force evac helicopters had to go rescue the wounded from three times further away. There is a book about it. And POTUS was right to call that self promoting, hostile fire wary SOB the most overrated general on the planet. He was an actor, not a Marine.

Oh. The USAF choppers dropped the wounded off at Mattis' base for treatment, since it was the closest to the action. He saw that he was being left out and would look bad, he now knew the situation on the ground was stable, so he proceeded to launch helicopters to go support the Spec Ops guys..........filled the wounds of the wounded with rotor dust in the process.

Since he knew the wounded were injured by errant B-52 bombs from the beginning, Mattis had no reason to withhold support. He also had no reason for his after the fact chopper launches. He simply crawled under his bunk, shat his pants, and probably wished he was back at the recruiting station. These are the leaders of our military, post-2008. God Bless the troops on the front lines. The politicians in uniform have agendas, which is what you would say if one of them spoke up for POTUS.
200 senior officers purged by Obama just may be a conspiracy theory.

https://skeptoid.com/blog/2014/03/24/president-obama-purge-military/
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.

Yeah I remember the last time Susan Rice said someone served with “honor and distinction”. LOL....a damn deserter whose parents Barry invited to the WH. Mostly so he could get “touchy” with mom.
 
The transcript released by the White House shows Trump committed a crime.

What is your opinion of the Biden clip above? Criminal act being confessed, or not? If not, why the different standard?

Also, I posted a link to the transcript of Orange Man Bad's call to Ukraine. Heck, I even used NPR (so I probably should have verified the accuracy of the "transcript"). Can you point out the crime in that discussion? We still have some rules of evidence, I think. Now, I am not sure that critical analysis is allowed among useful idiots, but I figured I would give you an opportunity to support your assertion.
 
Last edited:
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.




A testimony is nothing more than an opinion so cross examination is necessary to give it more credibility. So Col Vindman needs to answer some questions such as the following:

1.. So you disagreed with the President but so what? Is it against the law to investigate corruption involving American citizens with another country's govt? In fact isn't that what a President should do?
2. Who influenced u to come forward
3. What was your actual responsibility at the white house? Were u involved in national security policy? Did u approve of DT(unlike Obama) supplying aid in the form of weapons to Ukraine to help their national security?

4. .Did u know that Hillary’s campaign had Ukraine dig up dirt on Trump in during the 2016 which resulted in Manafort resigning and eventually imprisoned? However, his legal issues occurred back in 2005.

5. Did u, know about Biden’s admission on tape at least 3 times that there was a quid pro quo that $1B of aid would be withheld unless the prosecutor investigating a company where his son worked was fired.?

6. Did u raise objections on the Biden quid pro quo admission or the DNC’s request to dig up dirt on the Trump campaign in 2016 and if not why not?
 
Last edited:
Just curious, do you guys support the trashing of the decorated army officer just because he was troubled by the Trump call call?

President Bone Spurs doesn’t seem to like him.

No one trashed him. And WGAS what he thinks? The transcript is out there for all to see, hell even these dirtbags you support aren't even trying to use that BS
 
200 senior officers purged by Obama just may be a conspiracy theory.

https://skeptoid.com/blog/2014/03/24/president-obama-purge-military/

1) From Retired General Paul Vallely:

https://rense.com/general96/listof.html

2) Investors Business Daily (mentions the "9" specifically (all removed in a single year), discusses others generally:

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/197-military-officers-purged-by-obama/

3) Misc. Message Board Discussion:

https://www.debatepolitics.com/military/190279-list-military-elite-purged-and-fired-under-obama.html

4) Message board with list of all names and ranks, not refuted by any listees that I can see:

https://www.assaultweb.net/forums/f...-list-of-military-officers-purged-under-obama

5) Investment Watch, another list:

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/list-of-names-military-purge-high-officers-terrifying/

Author/owner Brian Dunning of your chosen source, skeptoid.com, (from liberal-friendly Wikipedia):

Wire fraud case
In August 2008, eBay filed suit against Dunning, accusing him of defrauding eBay and eBay affiliates in a cookie stuffing scheme for his company, Kessler's Flying Circus. In June 2010, based on the same allegations and following an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a grand jury indicted Dunning on charges of wire fraud.[24] On April 15, 2013, in the San Jose, California, U.S. District Court, as part of a plea agreement, Dunning pleaded guilty to wire fraud.[25]

From an agreement of the parties, the eBay civil suit was dismissed in May 2014 and Dunning was sentenced in August 2014 to fifteen months in prison for the company receiving between $200,000 and $400,000 in fraudulent commissions from eBay.[26][27][28][29]

In a statement on his website, Dunning insists that he is innocent, claiming he only agreed to the settlement because he could not afford to continue the legal battle. He describes the scheme he was accused of as something "eBay now requires all its affiliates [to] do" that was, however, "paradoxically prohibited" by "antiquated language in their original 2002 contract". Regarding the settlement, he claims that he was "in the right, but [...] drained of money and had lost [his] house to legal bills", which, in his words, forced him to "plead[...] guilty to a made-up crime."[27]



Since you commies chastise us when we are critical of the testimony of "decorated combat veterans", you certainly will not denigrate the reputation of Gen. Vallely in favor of a convicted felon (after all, those Rappaport/Flynn types are always guilty).

Thank you for supporting my narrative.
 
Just curious, do you guys support the trashing of the decorated army officer just because he was troubled by the Trump call call?

President Bone Spurs doesn’t seem to like him.

Answer my ? please. I have never talked with a murderer before. Whats it like knowing you support the taking of innocent life and believe in it whole heartedly? Also do you agree with the MILLIONS spent trying to find a crime by the president? You are full of crap, cant speak the truth and won't accept the truth. You are an America hating baby killing loon.
 
Their hero can do no wrong, see nothing wrong with using tax payer money as leverage for a foreign government to investigate a Trump opponent.

I assume that means the Trumpers would have no problems with Dems in Congress using tax dollars as pawns for foreign governments to investigate Pubs.
He's actually your hero brother. You just don't realize it yet. Get woke.
 
The transcript released by the White House shows Trump committed a crime.
The transcript proved he committed no crime. The dems and Schiff have lied every step of the way and the press doubles down on the fabricated lies. The only thing you are witnessing is an attempted coup, by a Morally bankrupt party of self serving professional crooks.
 
Like I said all the usual blind and dumb Pubs showed up right on schedule. Too bad there is no refuting the mountain of incriminating evidence against the worst president in 165 years. Embrace the suck.
I seriously don't think you understand what incriminating means Roy... and you obviously don't give a damn about an actual coup attempt against our country.
 
Just curious, do you guys support the trashing of the decorated army officer just because he was troubled by the Trump call call?

President Bone Spurs doesn’t seem to like him.

What does him being an officer at all have to do with this? Does military service validate your opinion?

Our country has just seen some good men get abused publically during Supreme Court hearings for the want of political posturing.

What do you want? You are the pot calling the kettle black. Silly
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.
I'd like to see him do the Curly Joe woop woop woop woop woop.
 
Like I said all the usual blind and dumb Pubs showed up right on schedule. Too bad there is no refuting the mountain of incriminating evidence against the worst president in 165 years. Embrace the suck.

Can't you produce such evidence? Because the full weight and power of the federal government with 3 house investigations, a Senate investigation and Bob Muller couldn't find any, but you see a mountain of evidence? Yeah that makes you look sane... You're not Adam Schiff areyou?
 
combat, 20 year US Army, currently serving, Lt. Colonel. A man of impeccable credentials who was on the 1st Liar's Ukrainian extortion call for opponent dirt v a political rival's son. The Pubs demanded a smoking gun and it wasn't enough that the Liar In Chief released the actual damning call transcript? It wasn't enough to pursue the truth revealed by a whistleblower even though the court have ruled the investigation completely legal? Oh nooooo, none of that mattered. Well, now Pubs have sworn testimony from an eye witness. A man who went to his superiors and NSD lead counsel before saying a word to anyone. A man who doesn't know who the whistleblower is.... which doesn't matter anyway because the law --- a law current Pubs voted for --- protects that identity.

KABOOM! goes the smoking gun.

BTW Roy, where were you when your leftist buddies were setting up General Flynn?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT