Now if only fools like “the committee” and Booger “double down on SMU despite them being murdered at the half in a hostile environment because they came back on CLEMSON to ALMOST win and that’s the same thing” McFarland could comprehend the following grid to inform their decisions and prognosticating…
“Title Contender” Caliber
Top half of SEC
Top quarter of BIG10 (group of 16, whatever the hell they call themselves now)
“Quality Teams You Best Not Sleepwalk Against” Caliber
Bottom half of SEC
Notre Dame
Boise State and ASU? (TBD)
“Crapshoot of Interchangable Programs with Mediocre Ceilings” Caliber
Entire ACC
Entire Big12 (minus ASU?)
Bottom 3/4 of BIG10 (I mean BIG16, no I mean BIG10)
Programs from the “Group of 5” (minus Boise State?)
“Title Contender” Caliber
Top half of SEC
Top quarter of BIG10 (group of 16, whatever the hell they call themselves now)
“Quality Teams You Best Not Sleepwalk Against” Caliber
Bottom half of SEC
Notre Dame
Boise State and ASU? (TBD)
“Crapshoot of Interchangable Programs with Mediocre Ceilings” Caliber
Entire ACC
Entire Big12 (minus ASU?)
Bottom 3/4 of BIG10 (I mean BIG16, no I mean BIG10)
Programs from the “Group of 5” (minus Boise State?)
Last edited:
