Have we really come to this?
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...ter_racist_online_comments_spark_outrage.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...ter_racist_online_comments_spark_outrage.html
Duke prof about to get ousted for criticizing black people
- Thread starter ''M''
- Start date
That little First Amendment thing is such a pain in the ass. We should probably do away with it before someone's feelings get hurt.
Yep, liberals don't like it. Unless it is about agreeing with them. But this poor bastard should know you can't be critical of a protected class. Thats a big no no.
Yet that Black profess ..I think Georgetown tweeted all sorts of racial stuff about white men...school called it free speech and stood behind her
He should know better and the Prof at Boston should have too.
Difference is he catches more flak and will likely lose his job for the comments while she won't.
Difference is he catches more flak and will likely lose his job for the comments while she won't.
She might now that she's accused of trolling a white rape victim. What a sweetheart. Just the kind of prof this country needs.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/05/1...y-accused-ridiculing-white/?intcmp=latestnews
Thanks very much to all you people who have consistently voted liberal for the last 2 decades.
I wouldn't paint it as generic liberalism at all. More like fascism...at best it's hatefulness and retribution
But they are, in every sense of the word. Liberalism embodies the worst of all the ism's. Fascism, Socialism, Communisim . Its the base of their core principals
Agree with everything the guy said...just factual for certain segments of the black community...others get along as well more or less as the rest of us...BUT no sorrow for this guy...he is a commie from way back...had to be at party member in the 60s...maybe not but should have been...since he is in his 80s maybe he is hesitant to continue lying his arse off as his judgment day could come at any second...anyway happy to see the libtards eat one of their own.
I took the time to read through his entire comment and there are definately good points made. The problem is his use of terms like "the blacks" and of course basically making blanket statements about an entire race.
Cause that's who he was talking about. 95% VOTE for democRATS. What more needs be said?
rolo, you are right on ,it is astonishing at how folks can be led by the" isms" and seem not to be aware. if they just researched the people
in the administration that call the shots, they would see their trails of " isms " leading to where they are now . some have covered up some of their trail; but there is plenty there to make a" good ole red blooded American " cringe .
You don't like the Tea Party? Can you give us reasons and examples why?? My guess is you can't...just a guess
Thinking the tea party was about taxes and govt. spending and had NOTHING to do with race, since there were many blacks who were tea party members. Folks like Pelosi and others tried unsuccessfully to find examples of racism within the Tea Party. They were unsuccessful, but that didn't stop the liberals from using "race" as a means to divide. Anything for Democratic votes and to maintain the Federal Govt. "plantation" unfortunately. But why would the Democrats exist if they didn't have "needy" people who needed crumbs from the Fed. Govt's table. If folks had jobs, businesses, and were taxpayers many would possibly be Tea Partiers regardless of race because they'd be concerned with how the government spends their tax dollars.
Free speech has been replaced by "political correctness" as defined by liberals and most of the media. Which is why it's okay to criticize Christians but not Islam and why Obama thinks it's okay to make excuses for ISIS based on the Crusades in 1060. Ever wonder why the dudes shown breaking into houses in the ADT commercials are middle age white guys? Don't we know those are the folks who commit 99% of all crimes?
Last edited:
I remember when blacks were not good enough to play any type of ball at uga. You all were voting as democrats then. My how times have changed. Another blanket statement covered by the fifth amendment. However, that nor any other amendments applied toward blacks folks. Who was the protected class at that time? Just maybe one of you is competent enough to answer that question.
After the Koch brothers received their subsidies, only crumbs were left. I know you aren't informed enough to acknowledge or accept that bit of irony
There are about as many blacks in the tea party as there were house slaves o the plantation.
they also in the same predicament. Go figure.
they also in the same predicament. Go figure.
