news reporting that the FBI will question her for the first time . they will also question other participants in the e- mail scandal . it is reported that this should start this week .
FBI to question clinton
- Thread starter jenkinscreekdawg
- Start date
I wonder if they'll be questioning U.S. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter who continued using a private email server for months after the scandal involving Hitlery's private email use was exposed.
This is the biggest issue I have with a soon to be Hillary presidency.
We could be in the middle of an attack from a foreign government and there would be those like some posters who would gleefully harass her to the point of weakening our capabilities.
This happened in the late 90s and we'll never know what damages were done to our preparedness.
I can hear all of the hypocrites ''what about the children'' BS, I dread it.
We could be in the middle of an attack from a foreign government and there would be those like some posters who would gleefully harass her to the point of weakening our capabilities.
This happened in the late 90s and we'll never know what damages were done to our preparedness.
I can hear all of the hypocrites ''what about the children'' BS, I dread it.
What are u talking about? I remember the dems attacking Bush very hard during the Iraq war. Even Harry Reid went so far as to say the war is lost. Hil calling Petraeus a liar even before he testifies before congress.
LOL! I couldn't care less about Hillary, but what a bunch of desperate nonsense and wasted money.
The 1,336 pages of emails and attachments from Carter's personal account were released late Friday in response to Freedom of Information Act requests by The Associated Press and other news organizations. None contained classified information, and most pertained to routine business such as scheduling and logistics. Also he did not have a private server like Hil.
Only common $hit for brains wouldn't care if the bitch left classified documents unsecured. You are truly as dumb as a stump. It's laughable thinking about how people must take advantage of you. Truly, the village idiot.
i know you are kidding , you can look at other places in the govt for wasted money , this is not one of them . it appears she was reckless with our national security and lying about it , she thinks she is above the law . i think it is a good thing for the FBI to examine all the facts and decide if she should be indicted or not , then it becomes a political " hot potato " for the DOJ .
Last edited:
Uhh, an article headlined, "Defense Secretary Ashton Carter Used Personal Email Nearly A Year" in the March 28 issue of the GOPUSA Eagle begs to differ. You can look it up @eagle@gopusamedia.com
The "village idiot" has backed the last two winning presidential candidates and is about to back a third. Meanwhile, you and your fellow Konservativ Klown Korps keep losing. Who's the REAL idiot?
hey pug , you are constantly telling people on this board that they are " in a swamp " , or some other crazy group ( not very original ) , i don't know what group you claim to be in ; but all i see is someone who THINKS they are pretty sharp . LOL
The debate during the Bush years was about life and death policies. That is very different than DIVERTING concentration away from life and death issues over a lot of politically motivated nonsense about blowjobs.
Clinton's biggest moralizing critics was the biggest collection of hypocrites ever. Livingston. Burton, Gingrich, Dennis Hastert, all of those guys and more have proven to be sleazeballs of the first order.
And you don't think the Hillary Clinton issues are about "life and death policies"? You can't be serious.
No.
Keep in mind... this isn't investigating an actual loss of data. This isn't investigating some specifically damaging or dangerous piece of intel that was stolen.
This is investigating if her PROCEDURE for handling e-mail might have allowed for data to have been stolen in theory. That's what the actual investigation is about... not an actual breech.
While the whole thing might indicate there should be a procedural change, it's hard to classify it as "life or death".
Well that's why you're a liberal. You live a morally bankrupt life, the ends justify the means. You DGAS if she left men to die, or that she put national security at risk and exposed covert agents and maybe got some killed, you don't care that she's a compulsive liars, or that she's a hypocrite. You only care about you, and the ppl you see that can get even for you. In shore, you're a slug, and bottom dweller, a person with no redeeming qualities....in shore...a liberal
I'm making a point about those who pretend this is about anything other than the latest get Clinton episode.
Hillary is absolutely correct about there being a long term effort to nail Her and/or Bill. That effort really has nothing to do with the facts in this particular case, they have used every tool available to bring them down.
That is why most Americans will wait and judge this on it's merits, not on the vitriol coming form the various anti Clinton camps.
Even in The Spanish inquisition you'd have been disqualified from testifying against any ''liberal'', as you so readily label everybody who disagrees with you.
You have zero credibility.
So you honestly think this is all made up? You dont' believe she had a private server? you don't believe there were classified info on that server, you don't believe she lied about that server? Is that pretty much a summary of your thoughts?
What life and death matters was WJC diverted from by attacks from cons? Nothing is a more life and death matter than the undermining a pres like the dems did while our soldiers are at war. Your argument lacks merit.
You know full well I'm not claiming it's ''made up''. I am stating it's just the latest in a long line of fake outrages by Clinton haters.
If this had no politically driven attention it would be a minor thing with very little thought about it by people like you.
The think Hillary made a mistake, I think her desire to keep her correspondences away from her enemies drove it.
Ok so you're saying its not outrageous? In short, nothing worth going after her for? Exposing National secrets is a minor thing in your opinion? Gotcha....Not surprised in the least I have to say.
The threat from Radicals for one thing. Republicans were far more concerned with getting Bill than keeping us safe. It diverted both those obsessed with his personal life and distracted the administration at a very dangerous time.
You're a very poor conversationalist, but a decent rabble rouser.
I'm saying your motivation in this, and most who fain outrage do so out of well established hate and/or for political gain.
I don't think any harm came to this country by Hillary using a private server. I do think harm will come to this country from those who will tie down the government with endless attempts to bring her down if she's elected.
Well hell, I stand corrected. This whole classified thing is just for show I guess, just think of all the money we've wasted trying to keep secrets when it really won't harm us in the first place. Deep, very deep. You should write to POSOTUS and let him know how silly this classified stuff is,
Actually, you're not really much of a thinker are you?
Again u decry repubs diverting WJC's attention during a "threat from radicals." ???? Then u seem to ignore the Dems undermining of GWB during the Iraq war in which he was indeed dealing with life and death matters. It is pretty obvious that u always side with Dems even when it is most illogical to do so.
rolo, the FBI is also investigating her for " donations for favors " , large donations to their foundation from foreign countries , they want to know what they got in return . did you know that dawgmatic was helen at one time , new handle .
Yea I figured it out a month ago. He denied it. The guy has an easy footprint to follow LOL
If the FBI is investigating that, it will be good if they find something.
But the actual thing we know they're investigating... having classified documents on her server... is essentially a "what if" investigation.
WHAT IF someone had hacked into her server?
WHAT IF they had been able to sort through the thousands of e-mails and find a the tenth of a percent of them that had classified information?
WHAT IF those classified messages had something truly threatening to the security of the US in them?
WHAT IF that hacker had then used that information to do bad things?
This isn't life or death. No information about any actual loss of data has been released (and frankly, based on the leaks regarding this... it would have if it were there).
Wow, I'm glad you cleared that up. Because all these legal ppl on TV, The FBI director, congressmen , senators and the actually signed documents that say she can't have a private server and that she understands she is responsible for the handling of classified documents under the penalty of law .....Hell again, all that shit is worthless. We just need guys like you to set us all straight.
i guess you had not been paying attention to the e mail dumps by the state department every friday afternoon for weeks , they were ordered to do so by a judge . there is no doubt she had classified info on her server and there was a leak that the FBI says she was hacked by a foreign govt, probably russia . computer hackers just download everything and then sort it out . don't think for a minute that classifications are used for fun , they ARE protecting sensitive information , that's what they are for . to say '" IF " they had something that could threaten our security , you can bet your a$$ they do . in fact, it was reported that at least one e mail had names of some of our agents ! it may be too soon to tell if any information has been used against us , and we may never know if it has been used or not , hacking govts don't reveal their source . what a lot on here don't realize , you have classifications , confidential,secret, top secret and etc., but built in those classifications is" THE NEED TO KNOW " restriction , you may have a certain clearance ; but if you don't have " THE NEED TO KNOW " you can't see that information . this brings up the question , where clinton and her aides were sending these classified msgs and who received them ?
Last edited:
Yes. But both Jaywalking and Murder are against the law. One is a citation with a fine, the other is a felony with a long prison sentence.
The act that most of the people clamoring for a charge against Hillary on is 18 U.S.C. § 1924.
(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Now if you ignore the question of if the Secretary of State has the ability to authorize herself to remove documents (which likely she does)... you're left with
"shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year or both". The maximum fine is 100,000 dollars.
The reality: Even if guilty this will be a 5,000 dollar fine with no jail time at the worst. Much more likely is a decision that the secretary of state has the ability to authorize herself to remove classified documents (as she also has the ability to declassify any document that received its classification from the state department).
There is a difference between the head of a executive department and a worker. Any other state department worker would have to get permission from the Secretary of STate to remove a classified document from government property if it was a state department document. By definition... if the Secretary of State does that they have given themselves permission... right?
Again... the fact remains that the person who can both declassify state department documents and give people permission to remove documents classified by the state department from government property... is the Secretary of State.
It's kind of like saying you have to get permission from your CEO to take a company computer off company property and then trying to get the CEO fired when he takes a computer off company property.
The FBI is gathering all of the information... in detail. They'll pass it on to the Justice Department. And Justice will say "The Secretary of State has the authority to authorize the removal of classified documents from government premises. Since there was no intent to steal the said documents, commit espionage or use them for personal gain, we see no basis for any charges being filed."
Unless of course they find one of those things. But I haven't heard anyone claiming that... they're simply saying she violated procedure.
why do you ignore the unsecure server , which she wasn't supposed to have for govt business . when they are talking about removing classification , they mean they found emails where she was telling aids to erase the classification heading and transmit on an unsecure server, classification is established by the originating agency( FBI,CIA,NSA,ETC.) , and LEGALLY she just can't declassify the message . the fact that she has classified info out of her office is a moot point . you know , i have given you the facts about classified information based on my experience and you are " whistlin past the grave yard " , you are just so typical of her ilk , so have at it !
