Like the "Affluenza teen" she has achieved unearned status & affluence. Both are irresponsible with OTHER people's money. Just like the Teen, she is responsible for the deaths of 4 people. Both are too rich and spoiled to understand the consequences of their actions. Nor do either think they should be held accountable. I hope the American people hold them both accountable.
Hillary is the "Affluenza Queen"
- Thread starter Hoffman_rg
- Start date
If she's responsible for those 4 deaths, W is responsible for half a million.
Last edited:
Funny the left forgets they as well voted for the War in Iraq, almost unanimously. So I guess that makes hillary responsible for 500,004 deaths.
Every damn politician up there is no different. When are ya'll going to realize that the politicians are all ultimately the same and stop bitching about one party versus the other.
She was responsible with 600 requests for more security that she says she didnt know about, 2 attacks on the same consulate that she says she didnt know about in 2012. But worse she covered up and lied about it.
I give that a big amen. There is no different between the two. Paul Ryan has been sucked into the abyss.
If u are talking establishment repubs like Boehner and McConnell u are right but with respect to those that are running for pres, there are great differences between the parties in immigration, foreign policy, and spending priorities.
Like I posted, if You're going to ''care'' about deceit leading to 4 deaths, why not care about years of deceit leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths ? Oh yeah, You hate Clinton.
It's just more selective outrage brought on more by political leanings than real moral conviction.
Nobody other than Bush and His cronies led the way with lies and manipulation. I do blame Hillary and others for not having the guts to stand against the popular tide Bush created though.
I can't help it if my political leanings agree with the facts about Hil and Benghazi . Facts can be inconvenient items.
The " years of deceit" u reference is more a function of your political leanings not facts. Can u prove that W lied about the intelligence leading to the Iraq war? Other countries like Great Britain agreed about WMDs in Iraq. Bill Clinton threatened to bomb Iraq during the 90s because he thought they were building WMDs.
Clinton didn't manipulate and deliberately conflate 9-11 with Iraq, that was W.
Bernie is a nut. Anyone who thinks terrorism is caused by global warming is in an alternate universe.
Again, can u prove that W manipulated the intelligence leading to the Iraq war? Done for the nite.
Bush was going to invade Iraq not matter what. It made his little peker hard just thinking about it. He kept repeating the same lie over and over relating Iraq to 9/11. Cheney was so infuriated when Conressman Wilson came back from Iraq and exposed the lie, that he outed his wife as a spy. imho Bush and Cheney should have been tried for war crimes and executed if found guilty
It has been proven. Hell Bush repeatedly suggested Iraq was involved in the 9-11 attacks and He refused to say otherwise till long after the invasion.
Nobody else was saying Iraq was close to building an atomic bomb other than the administration. He also used an Iraqi who was a convicted con-man and who The CIA and others told Bush couldn't be trusted to support His claims. The Administration also completely BSed about a terrorist training camp. They correctly stated it was in Iraq. What they didn't say was it was in the Kurdish no-fly zone where they were protected by American planes against Saddam. I'm not saying We deliberately protected them, but the camp WAS in American controlled space.
Most important, He used 9-11 to go after Iraq at the expense of finishing the job against Jihadist.
Bush was right about 9-11 changing the game, but just got the details completely wrong. What He should have seen was Iraq was a non-priority, they had no connections to the Sunni jihadist, in fact, the jihadist were Saddam's enemies for 40 years.
There is a great deal of talk, but ultimately the same results. What have the Pubs down to fight or defund Obama Care. Nothing. What about reigning in the spending? Nothing. They talk to their base about reducing the scope and size of the government then ultimately do nothing but talk as their power increases.
If you think there is a difference, then you are delusional.
Huh? She didn't earn her law degree from Yale? She didn't earn her election to the US Senate from New York? She didn't earn her appointment as Secretary of State? Maybe you should explain this.
That fornicator husband of Hilldog's has a minimum of 18 American deaths on his groping hands himself. ALL that POS had to do was send armor to Somalia......I pray a miserable existence for both the Clintons the arrogant %=\×%×%÷€×'s!
We won't get into his failure to kill OBL when he had the intell and chance(s),
I'm telling if trump wins the who dc system is screwed. If he pikes Cruz and Rubio and Christy on his ticket you can forget it. The job would be his Trump and Cruz and Christy would blow up the dc political crowed. Trump day one office kick out Obama care take away all the executive orders enforce the integration laws. He would get Iran China on the phone saying we a deal. Russia would respect us. Iran would fear us. They would not chant death to Israel. They would fear Israel.
Wrong, Clinton thought they had or were trying to get a nuke in the 90's.. http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html So did other countries.
The intelligence agencies of Britain, Germany, Russia, China, Israel, and France all agreed that Saddam had nukes. Even Hans Blix—who headed the UN team of inspectors trying to determine whether Saddam had complied with the demands of the Security Council that he dispose of the WMD he was known to have had in the past—lent further credibility to the case in a report he issued only a few months before the invasion:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=555
In the business world, no one usually knows or cares where u went to school. It is all about what u do after u get out. Hil rode Bill's coat tails to get her Senate job. Do u honestly think that Hillary Rodham would have been elected Senator. Everything else she achieved stems from the success of WJC.
'bitch'' '' suck buddy''...You don't try to hide Your contempt for women.
She was very active politically before She married Clinton. She is very smart and driven, which is more than I can say about many politicians Who have had connections to power on Their way up.
You could be dismissive of most successful public figures if having powerful benefactors was a disqualifier.
She is so smart she failed her first bar exam. Did she ever achieve anything on her own before WJC? Upon getting elected and appointed secy of state, she has achieved zilch. Her secty of state tenure will hurt her more than help her get the presidency.
Her resume is as strong as most Senators. She graduated Yale, practiced law, She was a senator and Secretary Of State. Go find a successful politician who didn't have connections on Their rise to prominence.
Bill Clinton was as close to a self made success as We've had, most rise through Their associations.
Here is a resume to be proud of http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2013/03/ever-take-look-at-ted-cruzs-resume.html
How about the middling actor Who switched parties because Nancy felt His opportunities were better as a Republican ? How about His use of celebrity to advance His political ambitions, or His complete makeover to the cowboy image from His country club golf attire to sell rubes on His being the character He played on Death Valley Days ?
What exactly qualified Reagan to lead The Free World ?
If The People elect Cruz, I'll be fine with it, they won't though.
Reagan was a successful governor of our largest state for 8 years on his resume. So who do u think will win? I think Cruz has as good a chance as anybody. .
Cruz would have a chance in the general election. He doesn't look like The Pubs' choice to represent them though.
sounds like you need to stay abreast of what is really happening, not what the liberal media feeds you...........try fox news .
Fox's polls have been very different from everybody else's this election season. Cruz is making up ground in early primary states in all the polls though. I hope He is the nominee, it will be a better national debate than the pompous crap slinging The Donald brings to the discussion.
All of these comments aimed at Her being an unattractive woman weakens Your argument to My thinking.
Cruz isn't handsome, so let's not vote for Him, see My point ?
i didn't say she was unattractive ( she is though) , i said she used to be an unshaven hippie , which is a fact !
I totally agree. Yes, there are minor differences, but both parties are far more interested in trying to blame the other for all of our issues, than trying to work together for the greater cause. It's all about money and power, and neither party wants to share.
