the Georgia State Senate rejected a proposed amendment that would have stopped illegal aliens granted deferred action under Obama's illegal immigration exec. amnesty from receiving driver's licenses in Georgia. It would also be hard to keep illegals from voting if they had driver's licenses. Polling shows Ga residents are overwhelmingly in favor of the proposed amendment put forth by State Senator Josh McCoon
I wrote a letter to my State Senator yesterday to find out why
- Thread starter Hoffman_rg
- Start date
Afraid pub dominance in GA has made them deaf to the people who put........
Them there with huge majorities. Doing some good things but they are wasting golden opps to put conservative policies in place for years to come. I don't how long it will be before GA turns purple and this opp is gone.
Them there with huge majorities. Doing some good things but they are wasting golden opps to put conservative policies in place for years to come. I don't how long it will be before GA turns purple and this opp is gone.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
The whole immigration issue is full of dumb ass ideas but from the left. We bring in 100K/mo of muslims from Syria, 100K/yr from Haiti, fly in illegals from central america to be with their illegals here in the USA. All with the objective of making whites a minority and changing the culture of the country to who knows what.
Whether u admit it or not, white males discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed this country into the greatest country this world has ever seen and u idiots want to fundamentally change it to who knows what. Sorry but that is what is dumb.
The whole immigration issue is full of dumb ass ideas but from the left. We bring in 100K/mo of muslims from Syria, 100K/yr from Haiti, fly in illegals from central america to be with their illegals here in the USA. All with the objective of making whites a minority and changing the culture of the country to who knows what.
Whether u admit it or not, white males discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed this country into the greatest country this world has ever seen and u idiots want to fundamentally change it to who knows what. Sorry but that is what is dumb.
Re: Who'd a thunk it?? RoyDawg wrong AGAIN**
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
By the way this would be a disaster. At the very least an unintended consequence would be 1,000% increase in unlicensed drivers.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Prove that it's not a humanitarian objective and is in fact an effort to make whites a minority.
Re: Who'd a thunk it?? RoyDawg wrong AGAIN**
I'm sure it's that you don't GAS and not that it's clear as day in the document you like to worship that you're wrong.
I'm sure it's that you don't GAS and not that it's clear as day in the document you like to worship that you're wrong.
Youre too much of a dumbass to even understand thread view
No, Roy missed another one, and you did too. It's not an issue between Fed vs State.
The law of gravity is true, too, but doesn't have much bearing here either. But use it as "proof",by all means if it makes you feel better.
No, Roy missed another one, and you did too. It's not an issue between Fed vs State.
The law of gravity is true, too, but doesn't have much bearing here either. But use it as "proof",by all means if it makes you feel better.
You prove the opposite. Marxist ideologues know what they are doing., Only.
Ignorant apologist don't. A country must have a distinct language and cultural to remain. Borders must be protected from illegal crossing and deliberate importation of people groups who will never join in a distinct language and culture.
Ignorant apologist don't. A country must have a distinct language and cultural to remain. Borders must be protected from illegal crossing and deliberate importation of people groups who will never join in a distinct language and culture.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Munson,
The left can't prove that global warming is responsible for respiratory diseases or the drought in California or the heavy snow fall in the northeast but they believe it anyway.
Obama has said that he wants to fundamentally change the country. Since he is far left and has been influenced by communists, marxists, and an America hating minister in the past, I think it is safe he would like to move us in that direction. If u look at voting percentages, whites vote republican and minorities vote heavily dem. So what conclusion would u make?
As for the immigration philosophy being purely humanitarian, Obama is hurting his own people by bringing in many illiterate, poor immigrants resulting in wage depression and more joblessness. That certainly isn't humanitrarian.
Munson,
The left can't prove that global warming is responsible for respiratory diseases or the drought in California or the heavy snow fall in the northeast but they believe it anyway.
Obama has said that he wants to fundamentally change the country. Since he is far left and has been influenced by communists, marxists, and an America hating minister in the past, I think it is safe he would like to move us in that direction. If u look at voting percentages, whites vote republican and minorities vote heavily dem. So what conclusion would u make?
As for the immigration philosophy being purely humanitarian, Obama is hurting his own people by bringing in many illiterate, poor immigrants resulting in wage depression and more joblessness. That certainly isn't humanitrarian.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Where can you prove that he is trying to ruin the country by allowing immigrants to come in? Where has he said "he wants to fundamentally change the country"?
As for your last comment, keeping someone alive is more important than keeping them employed.
Stay on topic. Not talking about global warming.
Where can you prove that he is trying to ruin the country by allowing immigrants to come in? Where has he said "he wants to fundamentally change the country"?
As for your last comment, keeping someone alive is more important than keeping them employed.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Here is Obama saying he wants to fundamentally change the country.
First a president's main responsibility is to improve the lives of the American people not bring in millions of illegal immigrants that lower wages, crowd hospital waiting rooms and our schools.
U can't prove that the Central American and Mexican immigrants lives are in danger. The Central American countries have not substantially changed recently to become any less safe than they have been in the past. They do not qualify for refugee status.
Open borders contributes to gang members and illegal drugs coming into the country which results in deaths. Furthermore, there have been quite a few people caught that come from terrorist-linked countries. Obama overlooks all this because his ideology trumps all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrefKCaV8m4
Here is Obama saying he wants to fundamentally change the country.
First a president's main responsibility is to improve the lives of the American people not bring in millions of illegal immigrants that lower wages, crowd hospital waiting rooms and our schools.
U can't prove that the Central American and Mexican immigrants lives are in danger. The Central American countries have not substantially changed recently to become any less safe than they have been in the past. They do not qualify for refugee status.
Open borders contributes to gang members and illegal drugs coming into the country which results in deaths. Furthermore, there have been quite a few people caught that come from terrorist-linked countries. Obama overlooks all this because his ideology trumps all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrefKCaV8m4
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Noticed you've dropped Syria.
Homicide rate Mexico - 21.5; Homicide rate Honduras - 90.4; Homicide rate Venezuela - 53.7; Homicide rate US - 4.7.
Noticed you've dropped Syria.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
. I noticed u didnt mention Obama wanting to "fundamentally change america" Why? What do u suppose he means?
2 points: The central american countries have high homicides because of poverty, the drug trade, unemployment, poor education, and gangs.. Similiar to many of our big cities. So in reality our inner cities are not much safer than the countries u list. And most end up in big cities.
The definition of a refugee would be persecution on the basis of race, religion, nationality, political, or membership in a particular social group. Mexicans, Central Americans don't qualify. As for Syrians and especially coptic christians who are being exterminated in the middle east, they qualify but I havent read where the christians have been offered refugee status. If obama were a christian like he says, he would be offering them refugee statis. Syrians qualify but I also question whether it wouldnt be better to give them humanitarian aid to stay where they live. How can we expect them to thrive here when they don't know the language and have no resources except taxpayer funds. They end up basically an underclass on the govt dole for several generations.
NO-53.2
Newark-34.4
St. Louis-35.5
Detroit-54.6
Balt-34.9
Chicago-18.5 but they have 400-500 homicides per yr.
It would seem again that the first priority for anyone with common sense would be to help the crime in your own country. Is your solution to bring all these people to the USA because they can't protect their own citizens? That is beyond foolish. How does it help these people or anyone by destroying our country? We just can't save the world.
. I noticed u didnt mention Obama wanting to "fundamentally change america" Why? What do u suppose he means?
2 points: The central american countries have high homicides because of poverty, the drug trade, unemployment, poor education, and gangs.. Similiar to many of our big cities. So in reality our inner cities are not much safer than the countries u list. And most end up in big cities.
The definition of a refugee would be persecution on the basis of race, religion, nationality, political, or membership in a particular social group. Mexicans, Central Americans don't qualify. As for Syrians and especially coptic christians who are being exterminated in the middle east, they qualify but I havent read where the christians have been offered refugee status. If obama were a christian like he says, he would be offering them refugee statis. Syrians qualify but I also question whether it wouldnt be better to give them humanitarian aid to stay where they live. How can we expect them to thrive here when they don't know the language and have no resources except taxpayer funds. They end up basically an underclass on the govt dole for several generations.
NO-53.2
Newark-34.4
St. Louis-35.5
Detroit-54.6
Balt-34.9
Chicago-18.5 but they have 400-500 homicides per yr.
It would seem again that the first priority for anyone with common sense would be to help the crime in your own country. Is your solution to bring all these people to the USA because they can't protect their own citizens? That is beyond foolish. How does it help these people or anyone by destroying our country? We just can't save the world.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
I'm guessing he "means" this since it was the next line:
"In five days, you can turn the page on policies that put greed and irresponsibility on Wall Street before the hard work and sacrifice of folks on Main Street. In five days, you can choose policies that invest in our middle class, and create new jobs, and grow this economy, so that everyone has a chance to succeed, not just the CEO, but the secretary and janitor, not just the factory owner, but the men and women on the factory floor."
Doesn't sound all that bad to me. I understand and respect if you think that's poor policy but it's not nefarious on its face. He certainly didn't say "By fundamentally change America I mean make the white race the minority [your words]." Hell, he doesn't even mention immigration.
Your argument is he wants to fundamentally change America by making whites the minority. To show that you have to prove that immigration is at least not for any other reason. You brought up two situations where humanitarianism is largely the reason we are allowing immigration. Kudos for addressing the biggest flaw to your argument.
But regardless, let's say that Obama is wrong about worrying about humanitarian efforts and should instead be concentrating on problems at home first. That still doesn't prove that he's letting in ppl to make whites the majority. That just shows that he's mistaken in his belief that we should provide aid to those in need.
Again, can you show he is purposefully attempting to make whites the minority?
And lastly hasn't Obama tried to control crime in say Chicago and that when he did didn't people complain that he (via Holder) was overstepping his bounds?
This post was edited on 4/10 2:07 PM by ARealMunson
This post was edited on 4/10 2:21 PM by ARealMunson
I'm guessing he "means" this since it was the next line:
"In five days, you can turn the page on policies that put greed and irresponsibility on Wall Street before the hard work and sacrifice of folks on Main Street. In five days, you can choose policies that invest in our middle class, and create new jobs, and grow this economy, so that everyone has a chance to succeed, not just the CEO, but the secretary and janitor, not just the factory owner, but the men and women on the factory floor."
Doesn't sound all that bad to me. I understand and respect if you think that's poor policy but it's not nefarious on its face. He certainly didn't say "By fundamentally change America I mean make the white race the minority [your words]." Hell, he doesn't even mention immigration.
Your argument is he wants to fundamentally change America by making whites the minority. To show that you have to prove that immigration is at least not for any other reason. You brought up two situations where humanitarianism is largely the reason we are allowing immigration. Kudos for addressing the biggest flaw to your argument.
But regardless, let's say that Obama is wrong about worrying about humanitarian efforts and should instead be concentrating on problems at home first. That still doesn't prove that he's letting in ppl to make whites the majority. That just shows that he's mistaken in his belief that we should provide aid to those in need.
Again, can you show he is purposefully attempting to make whites the minority?
And lastly hasn't Obama tried to control crime in say Chicago and that when he did didn't people complain that he (via Holder) was overstepping his bounds?
This post was edited on 4/10 2:07 PM by ARealMunson
This post was edited on 4/10 2:21 PM by ARealMunson
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Imo, a "fundamental change" in America would be more than the typical Democrat playbook they have used for decades highlighting wage inequality, more jobs for the middle class, etc.
U say I identified 2 flaws in my argument. Not so fast. One of the persecuted groups , Coptic Christians, have not been offered refugee status here. France has offered them refugee status. So that says more about Obama's claim that he is a Christian. Any true Christian would be offering them asylum and they deserve it. Can't prove it but u have to be able to look into his heart and no one do that. The problem with offering Syrians asylum is u don't know how many are actually terrorists disguised as refugees? We don't have the resources to give them background checks if one could actually check their background. So I don't believe we should take Syrian refugees but instead give them humanitarian aid. But we are bringing in thousands as refugees.
As for Obama wanting to make whites a minority, u would have to agree that doing so would cement democrats as a dominant political party. Look at Calif and NY. Both have very high illegal immigrant populations and repubs really don't have a chance. U have to admit Obama is encouraging and assisting hispanics and people from Latin America.to come here. He found a loophole in our immigration law where he can classify them as refugees to allow them entry. Then they don't enforce internal immigration laws so they stay. He even has sued the state who have tried to enforce immigration laws. He has released even criminal aliens from jail. Obama has done everything he can to not enforce our immigration laws and in my opinion offer amnesty to millions who are already here. . Then comes extended family. I can only prove my case with circumstantial evidence because he is not going to come out and say it.
Imo, a "fundamental change" in America would be more than the typical Democrat playbook they have used for decades highlighting wage inequality, more jobs for the middle class, etc.
U say I identified 2 flaws in my argument. Not so fast. One of the persecuted groups , Coptic Christians, have not been offered refugee status here. France has offered them refugee status. So that says more about Obama's claim that he is a Christian. Any true Christian would be offering them asylum and they deserve it. Can't prove it but u have to be able to look into his heart and no one do that. The problem with offering Syrians asylum is u don't know how many are actually terrorists disguised as refugees? We don't have the resources to give them background checks if one could actually check their background. So I don't believe we should take Syrian refugees but instead give them humanitarian aid. But we are bringing in thousands as refugees.
As for Obama wanting to make whites a minority, u would have to agree that doing so would cement democrats as a dominant political party. Look at Calif and NY. Both have very high illegal immigrant populations and repubs really don't have a chance. U have to admit Obama is encouraging and assisting hispanics and people from Latin America.to come here. He found a loophole in our immigration law where he can classify them as refugees to allow them entry. Then they don't enforce internal immigration laws so they stay. He even has sued the state who have tried to enforce immigration laws. He has released even criminal aliens from jail. Obama has done everything he can to not enforce our immigration laws and in my opinion offer amnesty to millions who are already here. . Then comes extended family. I can only prove my case with circumstantial evidence because he is not going to come out and say it.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Would rather have a beer and see if I still care come Monday. Have a good 'un.
Would rather have a beer and see if I still care come Monday. Have a good 'un.
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Munson, u may not care but I just ran across an op ed put out today by Jeff Sessions on immigration that is really good.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/slow-the-immigration-wave/2015/04/09/c6d8e3d4-dd52-11e4-a500-1c5bb1d8ff6a_story.html
Munson, u may not care but I just ran across an op ed put out today by Jeff Sessions on immigration that is really good.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/slow-the-immigration-wave/2015/04/09/c6d8e3d4-dd52-11e4-a500-1c5bb1d8ff6a_story.html
Re: Fed law trumps McCoon's dumbass ideas. Thank Christ. **
Marked for Monday. Thanks for sharing.
Marked for Monday. Thanks for sharing.
