If you’re the CFP, you have active conference commissioners, ADs, and head coaches of major institutions essentially calling BS on the whole ranking system. You also have sitting head coaches essentially saying that they have no idea what the committee looks at and how they make their rankings (Kirby a few weeks ago as an example).
The committee’s deliberation should be made public in my opinion, especially with active ADs sitting on this committee making decisions. Furthermore, with active ADs, how can there not be some form of bias? Whether that bias is intentional or not, that compromises your product.
I know a lot goes on behind the scenes in terms of money and decision making with the conferences, but I’d like to get y’all’s thoughts on it
The committee’s deliberation should be made public in my opinion, especially with active ADs sitting on this committee making decisions. Furthermore, with active ADs, how can there not be some form of bias? Whether that bias is intentional or not, that compromises your product.
I know a lot goes on behind the scenes in terms of money and decision making with the conferences, but I’d like to get y’all’s thoughts on it
