It this is true, what would be the reasoning?
- Thread starter DawglegrightinSC
- Start date
Biden has already cemented his presidency as the most corrupt ever. Be gone varmit.
Last edited:
He is a paid off stooge of the Soros/WEF canal would be my guess. If not paid off, then fully compromised.
Yall remember when all the Democrats that used to be here told us the Replacement Theory was hogwash ? Pepperidge Farm and litedawg remembers, right Shonuff?
My guess is they knew that going so far left was going to alienate a lot of moderate Democrats. So they import a bunch of new Democrat voters, except their plans to jail /kill Trump failed and it all blew up in their face.
The Dems screwed up badly. Joe Biden was a terrible candidate. Harris was as well. Kicking Biden out was bad. Ignoring the middle class was the death knell. All this trans / culture sht was just a bunch of noise. They are arrogant and got exposed. Turns out nobody gives a shit what George Clooney thinks.
But this is all part of the WEF plan. Spread poor brown Muslim people out all over the West for them to slowly erode Western Culture. Look at France. Look at the UK now, they are arresting folks for social media posts. Canada, Scotland, Ireland, etc. Italy pushed back and Poland said fck no . Look at Japan, they allow ZERO Muslims into their society. Literally nobody wants any of the Palestinians. I wonder why....?
Jake Sullivan was an assistant to secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 when he sent an email to her confirming that "al-qaeda is on our side in Syria".
We would not have ever known about the funding of al-qaeda terrorist networks in Syria by the USA unless of th Snowden leaks
Jake Sullivan proves how loyalty gets rewarded in the DOS under democratic presidents
We would not have ever known about the funding of al-qaeda terrorist networks in Syria by the USA unless of th Snowden leaks
Jake Sullivan proves how loyalty gets rewarded in the DOS under democratic presidents
I realize the POTUS can instruct the executive branch to refrain from prosecuting certain crimes under the power of prosecutorial discretion. However, wouldn't it be a crime for an administration to actively participate in enabling groups to violate our immigration laws? Iows, it's one thing for a prosecutor to refuse to prosecute a bank robber and quite another if the prosecutor helps the criminals plan the crime and provides logistical assistance.
