ADVERTISEMENT

Nice how ABC is fact checking Trump during the debate.....

and letting Kamala roll with her bullshit unimpeded.

If the conflict of interest is not evident by now, it never will be.

I hope you libs are happy with this shit. I hope to see you in the future with a big socialist peepee up your bunghole.
It is crazy obvious, but it is what is is now. We will never have another even debate. At least she looks like a compete dumbass with all the facial expressions. She must not have practiced not looking like a fool while Trump is talking.
 
200.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: wwforest
He's getting extra time every question. Anyone upset about that? No? Didn't think so.
He’s debating 3 people and having to debunk her lies. They never correct hers. That might take extra time. But the Dems have been telling folks all is well, don’t believe what you are actually experiencing and seeing, because there’s a group of academics somewhere who’ll swear everything is great.
 
He’s debating 3 people and having to debunk her lies. They never correct hers. That might take extra time. But the Dems have been telling folks all is well, don’t believe what you are actually experiencing and seeing, because there’s a group of academics somewhere who’ll swear everything is great.
He retorts with more lies. Lying liar who lies is lying.
 
Live polls support what you said
I ****ing hope so......Kamala said nothing that she could be held accountable for.....Trump gave specifics on his plan for the economy, immigration, foreign affairs, etc.

Kamala is a Manchurian candidate.....she has no ****ing clue as to what's going on. She turned on her senile boss and focused on her own glory. She is incapable of leading this country.
 
I ****ing hope so......Kamala said nothing that she could be held accountable for.....Trump gave specifics on his plan for the economy, immigration, foreign affairs, etc.

Kamala is a Manchurian candidate.....she has no ****ing clue as to what's going on. She turned on her senile boss and focused on her own glory. She is incapable of leading this country.
Trump gave specifics? You mean like when he said he has “concepts of a (healthcare) plan” that he’ll reveal “in the not-too-distant future?"
 
and letting Kamala roll with her bullshit unimpeded.

If the conflict of interest is not evident by now, it never will be.

I hope you libs are happy with this shit. I hope to see you in the future with a big socialist peepee up your bunghole.
Hope DJT pushes for another debat! This time w/ Fox as the moderators! Let’s see how that goes!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Krowking123
and letting Kamala roll with her bullshit unimpeded.

If the conflict of interest is not evident by now, it never will be.

I hope you libs are happy with this shit. I hope to see you in the future with a big socialist peepee up your bunghole.
OR ... Trump could just stop lying every time he opens his mouth!
 
Trump gave specifics? You mean like when he said he has “concepts of a (healthcare) plan” that he’ll reveal “in the not-too-distant future?"
Wasnt that when he was asked about a plan to replace Obamacare? When is the last time that subject has been part of this election?

Trump did not do well last night, at all. But he gets a pass for that imo. Not a question that is really relevant, in light of more pressing issues
 
Hope DJT pushes for another debat! This time w/ Fox as the moderators! Let’s see how that goes!
Why would they ever agree to that? Democrats don’t care about anyone or anything fair. God forbid she have to do three debates like any normal candidate
 
  • Like
Reactions: cherrydawg
All I know is I don’t want to ever hear that Kamala is dumb again. Trump has to be the dumbest mother****er on the planet falling for every single bait she put out there. Including when she said people leave his rallies early! When she said that I thought “no way he falls for that!” Sure enough. God that alone proves how easy he is to manipulate and thus a problem in the role of Commander in Chief.
 
Why would they ever agree to that? Democrats don’t care about anyone or anything fair. God forbid she have to do three debates like any normal candidate
The Harris campaign immediately called for another debate within minutes of the end of the debate last night. As far as I have heard, the Trump campaign has yet to respond.
 
The Harris campaign immediately called for another debate within minutes of the end of the debate last night. As far as I have heard, the Trump campaign has yet to respond.
Let’s get her on Fox then I’m down! Trumps been placating them with their Uber left leaning platforms Harris is girlboss enough to come into enemy territory right?
 
Let’s get her on Fox then I’m down! Trumps been placating them with their Uber left leaning platforms Harris is girlboss enough to come into enemy territory right?
Sorry, the network that had to pay $780m for knowingly lying about election fraud in an effort to prop up Trump’s entirely false claims of winning an election that he lost disqualified itself from consideration for a debate event involving the same guy who is still telling the same lies about election fraud nearly four years later.
 
They really only corrected Trump on a couple of things.

They pointed out that its not legal in any state to kill a baby after its born.

They pointed out that there was no evidence that Haitians were eating everyone's cats and dogs.

He said many, MANY other incorrect statements that were not live-Fact checked by the moderators to go along with those that Harris uttered. So its clear they were only live checking his most ridiculous, fantastical statements.


The one exchange that I thought was questionable was when Trump was claiming that Harris met with Putin but failed to stop him from invading Ukraine... which was apparently false, but the moderator then turned to Harris and asked had she ever met with Putin. That kinda felt like they were leading her because they obviously already knew the answer. So whether it was false or not it seem to me it would have been more appropriate to let Harris decide her own response rather than leading her with a question with an obvious answer.
 
no ... she didn't ... but she spoke to it (the economy)... the question was some formulation of the "better off than you were four years ago..." question.

four years ago... when we were in the midst of a pandemic. And he was telling us to shine a light on it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cherrydawg
and letting Kamala roll with her bullshit unimpeded.

If the conflict of interest is not evident by now, it never will be.

I hope you libs are happy with this shit. I hope to see you in the future with a big socialist peepee up your bunghole.
1) Of course they were biased.
2) Trump and anyone else could expect that and plan for it.
3) They weren't so biased that he couldn't have handled it. There were easy ways to avoid the pitfalls he found himself in. No reason why he couldn't have sidestepped the bias, especially with most facts on his side.
 
They really only corrected Trump on a couple of things.

They pointed out that its not legal in any state to kill a baby after its born.

They pointed out that there was no evidence that Haitians were eating everyone's cats and dogs.

He said many, MANY other incorrect statements that were not live-Fact checked by the moderators to go along with those that Harris uttered. So its clear they were only live checking his most ridiculous, fantastical statements.


The one exchange that I thought was questionable was when Trump was claiming that Harris met with Putin but failed to stop him from invading Ukraine... which was apparently false, but the moderator then turned to Harris and asked had she ever met with Putin. That kinda felt like they were leading her because they obviously already knew the answer. So whether it was false or not it seem to me it would have been more appropriate to let Harris decide her own response rather than leading her with a question with an obvious answer.
I think this is a fair analysis. I did feel like they gave her a couple more attack leading questions. They did a few for Trump too but my hazy impression is that it was slightly tilted toward Harris. But I think you’re dead on with the fact check part. I thought there was a ton more they could have fact checked him on (and at least a few things they might have fact-checked Harris on) but they were attempting to limit how much they did that to only the truly outlandish statements
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT