What a pompous sack of s**t.
Peter Strzok makes me dislike the entire FBI.
- Thread starter JudgeLarryDawg
- Start date
He should be shot at sunrise. And Trey Gowdy is as fake as Pamela Anderson's honkers. He's a phony, flapping gums, waving arms, do nothing RINO, attention whore. Another pompous sack of s**t, who I sort of like, Lou Dobbs, will tell you all about Gowdy. Just Google "Lou Dobbs Trey Gowdy" if interested.
You have to like Gowdy and how he took a short pause every time when referring to Lisa Page as Strzok's "colleague". I laffed.
Yeah, I did, too. Gowdy puts on a helluva show for a tv audience, just never gets anything done. I laughed when Trump tweeted about the "FBI Layer", too.
I don't know about that but I love how Gowdy is tearing his ass up.
Gowdy tore 'em up as head of the Benghazi investigation, too. For more than two years. All hat, no cattle.
Just as I suspected, these hearings were a mistake. This is simply an opportunity for "RATs to plan a defense strategy and for Strzok to get in self serving statements while not answering a single question when there was any danger of his being exposed as the 'RAT activist he is. "I don't know the answer", "I don't recall/remember" & "I'd love to answer but I can't". This guy is a consummate liar who is guilty of criminal acts inside the FBI. Everybody knows it.
I pin my fading hopes on the outside chance that Horowitz will recommend criminal charges….but I doubt he has the guts.
Agree, never been more disappointed in someone I thought was going to be special
Have you been talking to my ex wife??
Same here. Never. I thought he was the real deal.
Last edited:
Dang, that was great. Louie got pissed. I wonder if Strzok is doing himself no favors with that smirk. We’ll see if anybody has the nads to charge him with anything. I hope so, but I doubt it.
If any liberal watched this hearing today and still believes this witch hunt is anything but a cover up for HRC and an attempt to frame Trump, they truly are blind and are mental. Every single time Strzok was asked something that was going to confirm bias and get to the truth of this Russia BS, specifically the dossier paper trail, he either stuttered like an idiot, asked to defer to counsel, or the dems on the committee started white-knighting for Strzok and creating commotion so he didn't have to answer while time yielded to ask questions ran out.
Oh, and one of those democrat senators even said that Strzok deserved a Purple Heart award for facing questions. Libs are disgusting peaces of trash.
Oh, and one of those democrat senators even said that Strzok deserved a Purple Heart award for facing questions. Libs are disgusting peaces of trash.
Like when Russia's citizens despised their own KGB?
My wife said What an arrogant jerk. She never says anything like that. She has a strong dislike of Trump, Fox News and politics, but she was drawn to the fact that Strzok wouldn’t answer a simple basic question & always wanted to redirect / talk about anything else and do it in an arrogant way.
His responses to what he did answer were incredibly biased. Specifically when he lost his cool stating he was disgusted at Trumps Gold Star family comments. That’s encouraging to hear about your wife. Maybe she will eventually see the light.
So you think the USA being like the old Soviet Union is a good thing.
Guess so, you Trumpers all idolize good old Vlad
Funny you mention that when that is what your party wants to do to the US.
The Congressman that I thought shredded Strzok the most, was Steve Russell (OK), retired Lieutenant Colonel & CID. His line of questioning focused on contrasting his bias and conduct illustrated by his text messages with the findings of the IG report.
He then tied all of this to FBI’s Offensive Code and Penalty Guidelines. He also quoted the Justice Department’s Ethical Guidelines & several other guidelines relating to conduct.
He questioned his decisions, his bias & his character. He smoked his ass.
I just watched that. You’re right, smoked him, and did it without a bunch of showboating and histrionics.
Makes you wish we had another 534 members like him.
No doubt. He seems more concerned with getting to the crux of the matter than with his tv impact. I’m glad you brought my attention to it. Here’s a portion of it for anybody else who missed it. Very cool while cutting Strzok’s heart out, imo:
Y'all might not agree but ol Pete handled that pretty good. They were taking personal jabs and he hung in there like Ali against the ropes. I was looking for them to find something that pointed to him showing bias in any investigation and they couldnt. He may have been wrong in texting his personal opinion about trump but did it affect the investigation?
No...what I'm saying is that the FBI has become our version of the KGB.....we have a few renegade, socialist FBI agents like Strzok running amok.
The texts themselves showed bias and broke specific, written rules for conduct. If you can't see that, you are hopelessly blinded by bias yourself.
I just said that he was wrong in what he texted. But did he show that bias outside of his personal opinion and does it affect the investigation? That's my question.
Well, anybody with a brain would assume it did, or it was going to do so. That wasn't mere bias, it was acid-laced hatred mixed with Hillary love. What do you not get about an investigator stating "we will not allow him to become president" as it relates to our system of government and the will of the people? The guy should be shot. Deep down you want a communist economic system and a dictatorship run by somebody who will redistribute wealth. That is why you refuse to see the bias in Strzok's actions.
Why can't you just answer my question without assuming I have this agenda? Its not a personal attack against you or your opinion. Its just a different viewpoint than yours.
Lead investigator of both HRC and Trump Russia bullshit. HRCs exoneration letter is written in May. She isn’t interviewed until July 2nd, then cleared on July 5th. 13 days after the Trump investigation is started, not a single person interviewed and he is sending those texts and talking about impeachment with his lover. You tell me if that shows bias or any impropriety at all.
Because I don't like viewpoints of people who would tear down our electoral system and subvert the will of the people. I also do not like viewpoints of people who think capitalism is evil, nor the viewpoints of people who would lead us down a socialist path. Our system can always be improved, but democrats want a different system, a system which rewards the lazy and the scammers. Democrats will get their wish someday and there will be starving people in the streets, just like in other countries which wanted a different system which did not reward hard work, which rewarded party loyalty with a government job.
And he admitted to Congress that Ohr received the dossier and gave it to the FBI (he meant himself because otherwise, he’s incriminating himself). Ohr’s wife worked for Fusion GPS, whom the DNC hired to put together to dossier for the FISA warrant. But his hands are clean and Trump is in bed with Russia. If you really believe that bullshit after yesterday, you are mental.
Well if someone with access to the obamas stated he was planning to murder the Obama family, do you think we should assume he was serious? Or should we say "he has not actually murdered them, so just leave him alone?"
The assumptions you made were about my beliefs or agenda. Am I wrong in that assumption
