Possible bombshell from Pam Bondi

[icwdawg]

Pamela Jo Bondi is an American attorney, lobbyist and politician. A Republican, she served as the 37th Florida Attorney General from 2011 to 2019.

“Ok in a nutshell. This is going to the Supreme Court. Where they will rule that the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a country wide scale. It will go one of two ways, either they will rule that all the unconstitutional mail in ballots will be removed and the states ordered to recount without them or they will simply rule the election is invalid due to mass voter fraud and at that point it will be sent to the congress and senate for a vote. This is where it gets good. The house/congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every State gets one vote and 30 States are held by Republicans.and 19 by Democrats. They have to vote down party lines, they have no choice due to the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate votes for the Vice President where a similar even will take place. This is the law. This is why the Democrats are so mad at Nancy Pelosi. This will all happen in January. The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen So stop watching the fake news and don’t let your heart be troubled and live your life knowing this will all work out. President Trump will remain President I have researched all of this and it is Fact!

Another fun fact, they called Gore the President Elect for 30 days in 2000 until the courts ruled against him and declared Bush the winner. And two people that were part of that decision was none other that new Supreme Court Justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Why do you think the Democrats tried so hard to keep them from being confirmed?”

 

[dogstud]

Ooooof, not good for Demis

 

[Bwgiddens]

Pamela Jo Bondi is an American attorney, lobbyist and politician. A Republican, she served as the 37th Florida Attorney General from 2011 to 2019.

“Ok in a nutshell. This is going to the Supreme Court. Where they will rule that the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a country wide scale. It will go one of two ways, either they will rule that all the unconstitutional mail in ballots will be removed and the states ordered to recount without them or they will simply rule the election is invalid due to mass voter fraud and at that point it will be sent to the congress and senate for a vote. This is where it gets good. The house/congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every State gets one vote and 30 States are held by Republicans.and 19 by Democrats. They have to vote down party lines, they have no choice due to the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate votes for the Vice President where a similar even will take place. This is the law. This is why the Democrats are so mad at Nancy Pelosi. This will all happen in January. The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen So stop watching the fake news and don’t let your heart be troubled and live your life knowing this will all work out. President Trump will remain President I have researched all of this and it is Fact!

Another fun fact, they called Gore the President Elect for 30 days in 2000 until the courts ruled against him and declared Bush the winner. And two people that were part of that decision was none other that new Supreme Court Justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Why do you think the Democrats tried so hard to keep them from being confirmed?”

Lolol. Sure. Also, the Gore/Bush thing was like 500 votes. Right? What’s the difference between Biden and Trump? Is it 500 votes? Is it even less than 10,000 votes?

 

[khonelson]

Eric Ericsson just said on the radio it’s over. Lol, I think he knows this stuff better than you, haha. He’s a republican strategist, look up what he is saying, calling it the cold hard truth, tell you what, what’s the wager?.

 

[d-dawg]

I would like to see justice prevail after a thorough investigation. Whatever the outcome I want to know that we had a legitimate election. After the Russia hoax and numerous other attempts to take out the President we know what leftists are capable of doing.

 

[Troubadawg]

Pamela Jo Bondi is an American attorney, lobbyist and politician. A Republican, she served as the 37th Florida Attorney General from 2011 to 2019.

“Ok in a nutshell. This is going to the Supreme Court. Where they will rule that the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a country wide scale. It will go one of two ways, either they will rule that all the unconstitutional mail in ballots will be removed and the states ordered to recount without them or they will simply rule the election is invalid due to mass voter fraud and at that point it will be sent to the congress and senate for a vote. This is where it gets good. The house/congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every State gets one vote and 30 States are held by Republicans.and 19 by Democrats. They have to vote down party lines, they have no choice due to the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate votes for the Vice President where a similar even will take place. This is the law. This is why the Democrats are so mad at Nancy Pelosi. This will all happen in January. The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen So stop watching the fake news and don’t let your heart be troubled and live your life knowing this will all work out. President Trump will remain President I have researched all of this and it is Fact!

Another fun fact, they called Gore the President Elect for 30 days in 2000 until the courts ruled against him and declared Bush the winner. And two people that were part of that decision was none other that new Supreme Court Justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Why do you think the Democrats tried so hard to keep them from being confirmed?”

"Isn't it pretty to think so..."

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

Eric Ericsson just said on the radio it’s over. Lol, I think he knows this stuff better than you, haha. He’s a republican strategist, look up what he is saying, calling it the cold hard truth, tell you what, what’s the wager?.

He’s a moron. He happens to be right here, but citing to him is like citing to Joy Reid on, well, any subject.

It’s over because the very bright Justices on the Supreme Court won’t touch this other than to say “cert denied.”

 

[Bwgiddens]

He’s a moron. He happens to be right here, but citing to him is like citing to Joy Reid on, well, any subject.

It’s over because the very bright Justices on the Supreme Court won’t touch this other than to say “cert denied.”

What would they even have the opportunity to touch? Geoff Duncan has said there is no substantiated evidence of voter fraud in GA. That will continue from state to state.

 

[atlanta cock#]

Eric Ericsson just said on the radio it’s over. Lol, I think he knows this stuff better than you, haha. He’s a republican strategist, look up what he is saying, calling it the cold hard truth, tell you what, what’s the wager?.

I highly doubt this thing is changing because while he has the backing of a high percentage of GOP voters, his support from GOP politicians is not as solid. Pols look out for number 1. Who knows what kind of deals they are cutting in private? But, the only reason I’m not yet 100% convinced it’s over is because of how Trump is acting (at least on Twitter). Despite all of his bluster and bravado, one thing I’ve noticed over the years is that when Trump goes public (usually on Twitter) and acts positively certain or indignant, it seems he is always later proven either partially or entirely correct. Right now he is acting as confident as ever. We’ll see.

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

What would they even have the opportunity to touch? Geoff Duncan has said there is no substantiated evidence of voter fraud in GA. That will continue from state to state.

There will be substantiated voter fraud in nearly every state. Unless you don’t understand the law of large numbers (entirely possible). You really think in millions of votes someone didn’t fill out a vote for grandma who passed in August? Or a person who moved who wanted to vote twice? It takes a special kind of, uh, something, to believe that with passions this high, there won’t be isolated incidents everywhere. But that won’t change the results of an election. It will make your statement false.

My guess—unlike you, who has predetermined the facts (always a sure sign of objectivity), I don’t have positive knowledge of how each state will play out on the facts—is that they will not identify a significant volume of problems in any state of consequence. But claims can still be asserted based on dubious legal theories, and courts—not the media—are still charged with rejecting them. And the Court might even be asked to weigh in if an appellate court’s decision is appealed, and my prediction if that happens is that the Court will deny cert.

 

[Bwgiddens]

There will be substantiated voter fraud in nearly every state. Unless you don’t understand the law of large numbers (entirely possible). You really think in millions of votes someone didn’t fill out a vote for grandma who passed in August? Or a person who moved who wanted to vote twice? It takes a special kind of, uh, something, to believe that with passions this high, there won’t be isolated incidents everywhere. But that won’t change the results of an election. It will make your statement false.

My guess—unlike you, who has predetermined the facts (always a sure sign of objectivity), I don’t have positive knowledge of how each state will play out on the facts—is that they will not identify a significant volume of problems in any state of consequence. But claims can still be asserted based on dubious legal theories, and courts—not the media—are still charged with rejecting them. And the Court might even be asked to weigh in if an appellate court’s decision is appealed, and my prediction if that happens is that the Court will deny cert.

Well why is the Republican Georgia Lieutenant Governor saying there is no substantiated evidence of fraud in his state, then? That isn’t me saying that. That’s the Georgia Lieutenant Governor. I haven’t “predetermined” anything. Lmfao. I’m going by actual results. So. Cool story.

 

[zb3dawgs]

Pamela Jo Bondi is an American attorney, lobbyist and politician. A Republican, she served as the 37th Florida Attorney General from 2011 to 2019.

“Ok in a nutshell. This is going to the Supreme Court. Where they will rule that the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a country wide scale. It will go one of two ways, either they will rule that all the unconstitutional mail in ballots will be removed and the states ordered to recount without them or they will simply rule the election is invalid due to mass voter fraud and at that point it will be sent to the congress and senate for a vote. This is where it gets good. The house/congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every State gets one vote and 30 States are held by Republicans.and 19 by Democrats. They have to vote down party lines, they have no choice due to the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate votes for the Vice President where a similar even will take place. This is the law. This is why the Democrats are so mad at Nancy Pelosi. This will all happen in January. The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen So stop watching the fake news and don’t let your heart be troubled and live your life knowing this will all work out. President Trump will remain President I have researched all of this and it is Fact!

Another fun fact, they called Gore the President Elect for 30 days in 2000 until the courts ruled against him and declared Bush the winner. And two people that were part of that decision was none other that new Supreme Court Justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Why do you think the Democrats tried so hard to keep them from being confirmed?”

I can get behind that!

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

Well why is the Republican Georgia Lieutenant Governor saying there is no substantiated evidence of fraud in his state, then? That isn’t me saying that. That’s the Georgia Lieutenant Governor. I haven’t “predetermined” anything. Lmfao. I’m going by actual results. So. Cool story.

Yes, as I surmised, you don’t in fact understand the law of large numbers.

 

[Bwgiddens]

Yes, as I surmised, you don’t in fact understand the law of large numbers.

Still not answering my question. But, again, cool.

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

Still not answering my question. But, again, cool.

I did, if you understand the law of large numbers. The SOS does. They don’t care about isolated incidents—that always happens—they care about patterns of behavior, and absent evidence of that, you can’t change the results. This is from the SOS:

Was there illegal voting? I am sure there was. And my office is investigating all of it. Does it rise to the numbers or margin necessary to change the outcome to where President Trump is given Georgia’s electoral votes? That is unlikely.

Every sentient human being understands that with this many voters, you will have illegal voting. It’s a statistical certainty. And not just accidental, but actual intentional violations. But sure, the laws of probability cease to exist for you. You probably make real grits in less than 5 minutes too.

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

Not one of them knows what you are talking about.

Possibly true but unnecessarily pretentious.

 

[Bwgiddens]

I did, if you understand the law of large numbers. The SOS does. They don’t care about isolated incidents—that always happens—they care about patterns of behavior, and absent evidence of that, you can’t change the results. This is from the SOS:

Was there illegal voting? I am sure there was. And my office is investigating all of it. Does it rise to the numbers or margin necessary to change the outcome to where President Trump is given Georgia’s electoral votes? That is unlikely.

Every sentient human being understands that with this many voters, you will have illegal voting. It’s a statistical certainty. And not just accidental, but actual intentional violations. But sure, the laws of probability cease to exist for you. You probably make real grits in less than 5 minutes too.

You didn’t. I asked why the Lieutenant Governor would say that. Saying “I’m sure there was” is not evidence.
It’s also extremely hilarious that you keep claiming that I, personally, said that there was no voter fraud on any level. However, I never said that. Your attempt at building a straw man has failed. It needs work for future use, if you choose to go that route.

 

[nice marmot]

Possibly true but unnecessarily pretentious.

withdrawn

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

You didn’t. I asked why the Lieutenant Governor would say that. Saying “I’m sure there was” is not evidence.
It’s also extremely hilarious that you keep claiming that I, personally, said that there was no voter fraud on any level. However, I never said that. Your attempt at building a straw man has failed. It needs work for future use, if you choose to go that route.

You posited him as an authority to prove a claim no reasonably intelligent person believes. That you’re disputing the SOS’s statement of the obvious makes it clear you believe that even though almost no one else does. But again, it’s pretty obvious you believe in magic grits and that millions of votes can be cast without a single—not one!!—person breaking the rules.

 

[Bwgiddens]

You posited him as an authority to prove a claim no reasonably intelligent person believes. That you’re disputing the SOS’s statement of the obvious makes it clear you believe that even though almost no one else does. But again, it’s pretty obvious you believe in magic grits and that millions of votes can be cast without a single—not one!!—person breaking the rules.

I never positioned anyone as authority. I simply asked why he would say that. A question which you never answered. I also never disputed anything the SOS said. I simply stated that someone saying “I’m sure of it” is not providing proof. And it isn’t. Can you please show me where I said, or even hinted, that millions of votes can be cast with a single person breaking the rules. If not, then keep your stupidity to yourself. Again, your straw man argument will not work here.

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

I never positioned anyone as authority. I simply asked why he would say that. A question which you never answered. I also never disputed anything the SOS said. I simply stated that someone saying “I’m sure of it” is not providing proof. And it isn’t. Can you please show me where I said, or even hinted, that millions of votes can be cast with a single person breaking the rules. If not, then keep your stupidity to yourself. Again, your straw man argument will not work here.

So are you saying that there was voter fraud in GA, or that there was not a single case? Or that you don’t know.

I can’t point to a single case of tax fraud in 2019 (I was a good boy). I guess there weren’t any.

 

[Bwgiddens]

So are you saying that there was voter fraud in GA, or that there was not a single case? Or that you don’t know.

I can’t point to a single case of tax fraud in 2019 (I was a good boy). I guess there weren’t any.

I’m saying that I don’t know if there was. My guess is that there are one offs (or something similar) everywhere. But to the point of tax fraud, if you don’t have any proof, then can you claim it happened? You’re trying to use the law of probability. Which is fine. But don’t say something factually happened without actual evidence to support fact. Otherwise, it’s an assumption.

 

[dawgfood0612]

This is the same Pam Bondi that as Florida Attorney General let Trump skate on fraud charges over Trump University.

Of course, that is after Trump gave her $25,000.

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

I’m saying that I don’t know if there was. My guess is that there are one offs (or something similar) everywhere. But to the point of tax fraud, if you don’t have any proof, then can you claim it happened? You’re trying to use the law of probability. Which is fine. But don’t say something factually happened without actual evidence to support fact. Otherwise, it’s an assumption.

The law of probability matters when people make statements that directly contradict known probabilities. Including the Lieutenant Governor. If you say “There was no substantiated tax fraud,” it’s a ridiculous claim because of probability theory. The same is true with voter fraud, and for those people who try to make propaganda claims by saying things that defy the laws of probability. And what’s sad is that normally people would criticize guys like Trump who do that type of thing all the time. But it’s okay when we do it.

And I have no hesitation relying on probability theory to say that something is false, because that’s what intelligent people do when people make outlandish claims. I don’t need to dig up specific cases—although i’m sure I will have an opportunity to bump this later with them—because they are there just like tax fraud is there. It’s absurd to believe otherwise unless you think this election is the one that changed human nature and the law of large numbers. “I don’t know” is either willful blindness or abject stupidity in this instance, I’ll let you choose which.

So stop pretending that there was no fraud (and pretending it is) and live with the more nuanced and accurate claim that there is no indication of any significant or material illegality that would call into question the results.

 

[Bwgiddens]

The law of probability matters when people make statements that directly contradict known probabilities. Including the Lieutenant Governor. If you say “There was no substantiated tax fraud,” it’s a ridiculous claim because of probability theory. The same is true with voter fraud, and for those people who try to make propaganda claims by saying things that defy the laws of probability. And what’s sad is that normally people would criticize guys like Trump who do that type of thing all the time. But it’s okay when we do it.

And I have no hesitation relying on probability theory to say that something is false, because that’s what intelligent people do when people make outlandish claims. I don’t need to dig up specific cases—although i’m sure I will have an opportunity to bump this later with them—because they are there just like tax fraud is there. It’s absurd to believe otherwise unless you think this election is the one that changed human nature and the law of large numbers. “I don’t know” is either willful blindness or abject stupidity in this instance, I’ll let you choose which.

So stop pretending that there was no fraud (and pretending it is) and live with the more nuanced and accurate claim that there is no indication of any significant or material illegality that would call into question the results.

Again. Another straw man. Never said or pretended that there was no fraud. How many times are you going to falsely claim that? My count is up to 4 so far. Also, my claim that you cannot say something is factual without any proof of facts is 100% accurate. It would simply be an assumption. Everyone knows this. So keep trying, dum-dum!

 

[brimur]

You didn’t. I asked why the Lieutenant Governor would say that. Saying “I’m sure there was” is not evidence.
It’s also extremely hilarious that you keep claiming that I, personally, said that there was no voter fraud on any level. However, I never said that. Your attempt at building a straw man has failed. It needs work for future use, if you choose to go that route.

He just really wanted to pontificate about the law of large numbers which nobody, including you, disagrees with. He just used you for his sad display. The guy is an insufferable insecure windbag.

 

[55dawg]

Well why is the Republican Georgia Lieutenant Governor saying there is no substantiated evidence of fraud in his state, then? That isn’t me saying that. That’s the Georgia Lieutenant Governor. I haven’t “predetermined” anything. Lmfao. I’m going by actual results. So. Cool story.
[/QUOTE]
the dude in charge of elections has said we will find fraud in the recount. Unless you call double voting something other than fraud. Not to mislead, he also said he “doubts” it will be in numbers large enough to change results .

 

[Bwgiddens]

.


The dude. Running

the dude in charge of elections has said we will find fraud in the recount. Unless you call double voting something other than fraud. Not to mislead, he also said he “doubts” it will be in numbers large enough to change results .

But has he found it? That’s the question.

 

[55dawg]

But has he found it? That’s the question.

There is. He will. That’s the answer.

 

[1966septemberdawg]

What would they even have the opportunity to touch? Geoff Duncan has said there is no substantiated evidence of voter fraud in GA. That will continue from state to state.

Yes. And Obama said we could keep our doctors! Ask any Native American Indian, you can not trust the government, especially the dems!

 

[VHDawg53]

Yes. And Obama said we could keep our doctors! Ask any Native American Indian, you can not trust the government, especially the dems!

Most Native Americans actually tell me not to trust the Whigs or the Democratic-Republicans

 

[A Tale of Two Dawgs]

Again. Another straw man. Never said or pretended that there was no fraud. How many times are you going to falsely claim that? My count is up to 4 so far. Also, my claim that you cannot say something is factual without any proof of facts is 100% accurate. It would simply be an assumption. Everyone knows this. So keep trying, dum-dum!

So then why does it matter if the Lt. Gov. says there isn’t something that you now seem to acknowledge exists? It’s almost as if you were using him as an authority for a proposition that is almost certainly untrue.

And I wish that everyone believed and behaved as if they actually understand the law of large numbers. They don’t, including some of your compatriots who just don’t like being called on their BS.

 

[Bwgiddens]

So then why does it matter if the Lt. Gov. says there isn’t something that you now seem to acknowledge exists? It’s almost as if you were using him as an authority for a proposition that is almost certainly untrue.

And I wish that everyone believed and behaved as if they actually understand the law of large numbers. They don’t, including some of your compatriots who just don’t like being called on their BS.

1- because it goes against those trying to factually state that there instances of voter fraud in GA, but there has yet to be any evidence.
2- I was asking why he would say such things if there, in fact, is evidence of voter fraud
3- you can find the answer to that question by simply reading what I write instead of making up what I say in your own mind.
4- It’s almost as if you didn’t want to have the conversation with me, but wanted to get your point across by using statements I never once said.

 

[atlanta cock#]

I highly doubt this thing is changing because while he has the backing of a high percentage of GOP voters, his support from GOP politicians is not as solid. Pols look out for number 1. Who knows what kind of deals they are cutting in private? But, the only reason I’m not yet 100% convinced it’s over is because of how Trump is acting (at least on Twitter). Despite all of his bluster and bravado, one thing I’ve noticed over the years is that when Trump goes public (usually on Twitter) and acts positively certain or indignant, it seems he is always later proven either partially or entirely correct. Right now he is acting as confident as ever. We’ll see.

Worth observing.