Pretty good idea
- Thread starter atlanta cock#
- Start date
Watermarks would be a big step backward in ballot paper security. We have a lot better options available, that cannot be as easily duplicated. You're also going to need a federal law requiring ballots to be printed on security paper, and disqualify all that are not.
As an example, here in Maricopa County there is a rule on the books that all ballots are to printed on a certain spec security paper (Rolland VoteSecur© paper, 80-100# stock). But there is no process in place to verify that ballots are on the correct paper stock and there is no law that would disqualify ballots printed on the wrong paper if they were found (and they have been found).
Last edited:
Elections are governed locally anyway. Bring back the chads!
and we are on our way to more secure elections , thanks god
one side does not even want id's lol
one side does not even want id's lol
Get this fixed before Canada is granted statehood.
Last edited:
Only the crooks don’t want secure elections. Why is both sides not making this a priority.
Taking a month to count ballots is unacceptable.
Taking a month to count ballots is unacceptable.
lol , I think we know which side tries to steal elections
Dems think there should be no ID requirement. Is that more secure? 😀
