Question About Polls

[JackRussellDawg]

Do y’all participate in political polls?
(Calls, on line, mail, etc)

I can’t remember the last time I did. I avoid them like the plague. I wonder if there are others like me.

I generally only trust Rasmussen, Zogby, and somewhat Real Clear Politics averages. I think most polling is corrupt in some way.

Let’s discuss amongst ourselves.

 

[MooseHumperDawg]

Don't trust and never been asked to participate.

 

[deadduckdawg]

Don't trust and never been asked to participate.

same here.

 

[Georgia Jim]

Do y’all participate in political polls?
(Calls, on line, mail, etc)

I can’t remember the last time I did. I avoid them like the plague. I wonder if there are others like me.

I generally only trust Rasmussen, Zogby, and somewhat Real Clear Politics averages. I think most polling is corrupt in some way.

Let’s discuss amongst ourselves.

99% of them are Bogus....Who, Where, How are they sampling and polling....Corruption runs deep in this game as well

 

[wayxpython]

Do y’all participate in political polls?
(Calls, on line, mail, etc)

I can’t remember the last time I did. I avoid them like the plague. I wonder if there are others like me.

I generally only trust Rasmussen, Zogby, and somewhat Real Clear Politics averages. I think most polling is corrupt in some way.

Let’s discuss amongst ourselves.

I've never participated in a poll; never trusted them anyway....we all saw through those BS polls in 2016 when they assured America the Bull Elephant wood win in landslide victory.

 

[jenkinscreekdawg]

Do y’all participate in political polls?
(Calls, on line, mail, etc)

I can’t remember the last time I did. I avoid them like the plague. I wonder if there are others like me.

I generally only trust Rasmussen, Zogby, and somewhat Real Clear Politics averages. I think most polling is corrupt in some way.

Let’s discuss amongst ourselves.

I have been asked to participate , I don't participate !

 

[MooseHumperDawg]

Dammit python dont tease us with that video. Oh, what could have been. Damm Soros and his sure-thing election software!

 

[Georgia Jim]

I've never participated in a poll; never trusted them anyway....we all saw through those BS polls in 2016 when they assured America the Bull Elephant wood win in landslide victory.

How the Hell did this above turn into what IT is today.....The Whole Damn FUGGLY TREE must have fell on her at some point.....or she turned Hedge Hog and had to look the part......

 

[JackRussellDawg]

Any libs / Trump haters want to weigh in about polls?

 

[atlanta cock#]

Here’s my poll. Who would you rather punch in the face?

Hillary
Bernie
The weasel who hosts Meet the Press
The shanks on The View
Colbert
All of CNN and MSNBC
Muschamp
NYT
WaPo

 

[CleanDawg]

Any libs / Trump haters want to weigh in about polls?

They’re out celebrating the ruling this morning that Trump has to turn over tax returns to NY court. This is it, we got him! They’ll be back when this one falls flat.

 

[Georgia Jim]

Here’s my poll. Who would you rather punch in the face?

Hillary
Bernie
The weasel who hosts Meet the Press
The shanks on The View
Colbert
All of CNN and MSNBC
Muschamp
NYT
WaPo

ALL of the above......at least once,

 

[Gunterbrian16]

Here’s my poll. Who would you rather punch in the face?

Hillary
Bernie
The weasel who hosts Meet the Press
The shanks on The View
Colbert
All of CNN and MSNBC
Muschamp
NYT
WaPo

Add mullen then all of the above

 

[MooseHumperDawg]

They’re out celebrating the ruling this morning that Trump has to turn over tax returns to NY court. This is it, we got him! They’ll be back when this one falls flat.

I expect that one to go to SCOTUS. I hope if/when he releases returns, it is an absolute nothing burger........sort of like everything else they have tried.

 

[JackRussellDawg]

Ok, so my conclusions from this here scientific poll are as follows:

1 We Chat brethren don’t trust polls.
2 We don’t participate in polls.
3 Hildabeast was somewhat bangable for one brief moment in time.
4 We want to punch all the libtards in the face.

And there you have the essence of polling.

 

[PotimusWillie]

Do y’all participate in political polls?
(Calls, on line, mail, etc)

I can’t remember the last time I did. I avoid them like the plague. I wonder if there are others like me.

I generally only trust Rasmussen, Zogby, and somewhat Real Clear Politics averages. I think most polling is corrupt in some way.

Let’s discuss amongst ourselves.

Popular vote doesn’t win Presidential elections.

Show me an electoral college map and give me the estimates there.

 

[Georgia Jim]

Ok, so my conclusions from this here scientific poll are as follows:

1 We Chat brethren don’t trust polls.
2 We don’t participate in polls.
3 Hildabeast was somewhat bangable for one brief moment in time.
4 We want to punch all the libtards in the face.

And there you have the essence of polling.

Exactly,........

 

[Stephenrein]

If a poll says something I disagree with then it was obviously fake.

 

[deadduckdawg]

If a poll says something I disagree with then it was obviously fake.

I think you're coming around.

 

[Rolodawg2011]

Polls aren't about trends, they're about making news. They (media) commission polls to get a specific result. Its about ratings. Anyone with an IQ above 80 knows the Dems don't have a chance in hell.

I saw a poll this morning that had Sleepy Job beating Trump by 17pts. Does anyone really believe that BS? Seriously, Or crazy Bernie beating him by 10. GTFO.

These Democrats are just weird, oddballs .

 

[Rolodawg2011]

If a poll says something I disagree with then it was obviously fake.

Do you honestly believe that any of these oddballs in the Current Democrat Freak show called a primary can beat Trump?

 

[Stephenrein]

Do you honestly believe that any of these oddballs in the Current Democrat Freak show called a primary can beat Trump?

Well, if there in no real quantitative data because the polls are all fake then how can you be so certain he wins?

 

[1966septemberdawg]

Well, if there in no real quantitative data because the polls are all fake then how can you be so certain he wins?

HISTORY!

 

[Stephenrein]

HISTORY!

The Trump presidency is so far from normal that it is hard to take precedent from history. Are you talking about incumbency?

 

[CleanDawg]

Well, if there in no real quantitative data because the polls are all fake then how can you be so certain he wins?

I’d say Trump’s results are all the quantitative data needed. No one be can argue with his results. Can you hate him and vote for one of the oddballs from democrat freak show? Sure, but I’m guessing most level headed folks will vote for results.

 

[Rolodawg2011]

Well, if there in no real quantitative data because the polls are all fake then how can you be so certain he wins?

Because while there are some really stupid, greedy and envious people in our Country, I don't believe there are enough of them to put one of these weird, pandering freaks in as the leader of the free world. Now answer my question

 

[Stephenrein]

I’d say Trump’s results are all the quantitative data needed. No one be can argue with his results. Can you hate him and vote for one of the oddballs from democrat freak show? Sure, but I’m guessing most level headed folks will vote for results.

I was asking for data that would indicate people are going to vote for him, not why they might. Changing the subject is classic Trumper.

Also the word "results" isn't a quantity.

It's like yelling "FACTS!" when questioned why you believe something. It is tipping your hand that you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Rolodawg2011]

I was asking for data that would indicate people are going to vote for him, not why they might. Changing the subject is classic Trumper.

Also the word "results" isn't a quantity.

It's like yelling "FACTS!" when questioned why you believe something. It is tipping your hand that you don't know what you're talking about.

Which of the current democrat freak show do you think can beat Trump and why?

 

[CleanDawg]

I was asking for data that would indicate people are going to vote for him, not why they might. Changing the subject is classic Trumper.

Also the word "results" isn't a quantity.

It's like yelling "FACTS!" when questioned why you believe something. It is tipping your hand that you don't know what you're talking about.

270 electoral votes is a result and a quantity. Your hate is obvious. Your education not so much.

 

[Stephenrein]

Because while there are some really stupid, greedy and envious people in our Country, I don't believe there are enough of them

Lol yeah Trump could never lose the popular vote. No way.

 

[Stephenrein]

270 electoral votes is a result and a quantity. Your hate is obvious. Your education not so much.

You changed the subject a third time.

 

[CleanDawg]

Which of the current democrat freak show do you think can beat Trump and why?

He can’t answer the question. There’s not a formula in which he can create that supports his opinion.

 

[Stephenrein]

Which of the current democrat freak show do you think can beat Trump and why?

Some of them.

Because Trump's behavior is embarrassing on a national level. Irrelevant, past-their-prime Facebook grandpa's look at trump and see themselves, so his blithering, oblique racism and lies are good things because "he gets it"! Everyone else is ashamed that the guy is in the white house.

He's Joe Biden but for people from Ellijay, not Syracuse.

Also, his kick the can down the road economy isn't going to look so great when the only people not pissed at us are the dictators he gushes over.

 

[Stephenrein]

He can’t answer the question. There’s not a formula in which he can create that supports his opinion.

 

[Stephenrein]

He can’t answer the question. There’s not a formula in which he can create that supports his opinion.

Also, you never clarified what I was asking.

What numbers could point to more people voting for Trump?

But projection (i.e. accusing other of what you're doing) is classic Trumper.

 

[Rolodawg2011]

Some of them.

Because Trump's behavior is embarrassing on a national level. Irrelevant, past-their-prime Facebook grandpa's look at trump and see themselves, so his blithering, oblique racism and lies are good things because "he gets it"! Everyone else is ashamed that the guy is in the white house.

He's Joe Biden but for people from Ellijay, not Syracuse.

Also, his kick the can down the road economy isn't going to look so great when the only people not pissed at us are the dictators he gushes over.

Dear God, which one? Look we know you're comfortable with the swamp and turning your miserable life over to the Government, you're here bashing Trump, so tell us who you support and why?

I know you can't be embarrassed being a liberal, but you look pretty stupid when you can't answer a simple question

 

[Rolodawg2011]

Lol yeah Trump could never lose the popular vote. No way.

Well, it's 2019 and you still don't know how our system works? Stupid is a requirement for being a liberal

 

[Stephenrein]

Well, it's 2019 and you still don't know how our system works? Stupid is a requirement for being a liberal

Let me walk you through this.

You said there were not enough people to vote against Trump. I pointed out that Trump lost the popular vote, indicating that there are plenty of people to vote against him. Particularly now that he has demonstrated that he is such an incompetent president that a tin can could run against him and win, and the Dems are putting that to the test.

You have to hide behind an antiquated system to get him into office. So no, it isn't about how many glorious patriots will stand up for trump against the villainous dems, like you want to believe, it's about leveraging the system. It's a "swamp" thing all the same.

 

[CleanDawg]

Also, you never clarified what I was asking.

What numbers could point to more people voting for Trump?

But projection (i.e. accusing other of what you're doing) is classic Trumper.

Some numbers for you start with: Unemployment, workforce participation, minority unemployment, 401k, IRA, business startups, checking account, inflation, private school tuition, oil price, natural gas price.

 

[Stephenrein]

Stupid is a requirement for being a liberal

You probably don't want to get into what the data says about this.