Or just kick him to the curb if he's not confirmed. Surely we can find someone better.
What’s the problem with him?Or just kick him to the curb if he's not confirmed. Surely we can find someone better.
Media (deep state) says he is bad and that is what people go with, IMO. When both parties don't like the pick that should be the only tell needed.What’s the problem with him?
I'm all for hardball but I'm not for playing games that are doomed to backfire. Support him or not, Gaetz doesn't enjoy a sterling reputation with either side. Trump needs someone that goes after crimes but also is respected by folks on both sides.GOP playing hardball for the first time in...ever. And the left can't handle it.
Beautiful!
He’s not one of them…What’s the problem with him?
if he doesn’t work out for the USA and Trump, can’t Trump fire/replace him🤷♂️? Playing games would be not putting in who the president nominates after winning the majority of America’s votes. Who coined the elections have consequences, Barack wasn’t it? Many thinks Gaetz is better than what Obama and Biden put in there…time will tell if the swamp doesn’t stop it.I'm all for hardball but I'm not for playing games that are doomed to backfire. Support him or not, Gaetz doesn't enjoy a sterling reputation with either side. Trump needs someone that goes after crimes but also is respected by folks on both sides.
jimmies rustledGOP playing hardball for the first time in...ever. And the left can't handle it.
Beautiful!
It's playing games because Gaetz isn't respected by a good number of senate Pubs and his confirmation isn't likely and even if he somehow gets confirmed will use a lot of political capital. Next, DC is in need of a cleansing and Trump has a great opportunity to make some things happen. Imo, he could have found a more respected AG that wouldn't have been an easy target for political prosecution charges if they do find a crime committed by a Dem. Gaetz is in my opinion someone that is going to make draining the swap harder for several reasons. Ted Cruz would have been a more capable AG and seen as less partisan.Playing games would be not putting in who the president nominates after winning the majority of America’s votes.
Him being picked was a shocker to me!Or just kick him to the curb if he's not confirmed. Surely we can find someone better.
Would just think Trump would have picked someone with a little more experience. I was thinking that the bald headed guy, can’t think of his name, would be a better pick. He was the acting ag after Barr left last time. Thought he did a pretty good job.What’s the problem with him?
Matt WhitakerWould just think Trump would have picked someone with a little more experience. I was thinking that the bald headed guy, can’t think of his name, would be a better pick. He was the acting ag after Barr left last time. Thought he did a pretty good job.
Jeffrey Rosen was acting AG after Barr. He is not a strong presence at all. Also has zero prosecution experience. You might be thinking of someone else.Would just think Trump would have picked someone with a little more experience. I was thinking that the bald headed guy, can’t think of his name, would be a better pick. He was the acting ag after Barr left last time. Thought he did a pretty good job.
No I was thinking of Whitaker.Jeffrey Rosen was acting AG after Barr. He is not a strong presence at all. Also has zero prosecution experience. You might be thinking of someone else.
Thanks DH that’s who I was thinking about.Matt Whitaker
I wish I could like this 10,000 times but I can’t so here’s a gold star.Media (deep state) says he is bad and that is what people go with, IMO. When both parties don't like the pick that should be the only tell needed.
Wouldn't that re-open the Congressional ethics investigation?
Whitaker was the acting AG between Sessions and Barr.No I was thinking of Whitaker.
THAT's why Trump chose Gaetz.
Love it. The investigations are deep state driven - sound familiar 🤣. “An enemy of my enemy is my friend” and ally.
IDK. Depends on if the deep state is cowed into backing down on what was likely only leaked to make him quit with more "Russia, Russia, Russia" type allegations. Timing can be everything.Wouldn't that re-open the Congressional ethics investigation?
You think you are witty with your WWE reference, but much like your jokes it just falls flat. Unlike you, I don't don't get my views from the Mockingbird media.Y’all get tickled about this like it’s a pro wrestling storyline - you know, the thing you actually know about.
Anyone who celebrates this kind of idiocy is more worried about nonsense than they are the security and well being of this Country. It’s a disgrace. You, me, all us lose if unqualified buddies are awarded for their fealty with crucial appointments.
Why does he need nuance? He has the Senate. Just pick someone qualified. Instead he nominated a clown. That deserves criticism. Anyone praising it, or going to the lengths you are to rationalize it, deserves criticism too.You think you are witty with your WWE reference, but much like your jokes it just falls flat. Unlike you, I don't don't get my views from the Mockingbird media.
"Celebrating idiocy" - this was the last 4 years in our country. Top to bottom. Fact and that is why Trump won.
Nuance is lost on you with the pick. Many moving parts in this cabinet thing, but did you ever think a sacrificial lamb may be needed to distract the swamp mob, while others get confirmed and things get accomplished? A red herring even? The left/media doesn't like it when the other side plays smart and has an organized plan. And of course the vitriol will be huge. He is going after these peoples jobs and their criminal actions.
What makes him a clown?Why does he need nuance? He has the Senate. Just pick someone qualified. Instead he nominated a clown. That deserves criticism. Anyone praising it, or going to the lengths you are to rationalize it, deserves criticism too.