After watching most of the games on Saturday, this is how I would rank the SEC.
1)Bama-Not many issues to correct. Maybe more QB experience needed
2)Texas AM-looked very good. But they did last year too after the USce game but fell off.
3)Ole Miss-Kelly looks better than Bo. Some OL issues but Tunsil did not play
4)Miss St-The most experience at QB but had some Def woes early.
5)UGA-RB's look great. Def Secondary a concern early.
6)Ark-Have a good QB, decent Def.
7)UF-Looked good....competition weak.
8)Aub-Def looks stout, QB play may be a concern. Scheduled a quality opponent.
9)Tenn- RB's looked good, BGreen moved the ball at will though.
10)USce- Have a lot of issues. Scheduled quality opponent
11)Missouri- Looked adequate. Weak competition too.
12)Kent-Stanley Williams looked good. Same ole Def however.
13)LSU-Did not get to see them. I am sure they will jump into the top 5 soon.
14)Vandy- Terrible
#5-8 could go either way....
1)Bama-Not many issues to correct. Maybe more QB experience needed
2)Texas AM-looked very good. But they did last year too after the USce game but fell off.
3)Ole Miss-Kelly looks better than Bo. Some OL issues but Tunsil did not play
4)Miss St-The most experience at QB but had some Def woes early.
5)UGA-RB's look great. Def Secondary a concern early.
6)Ark-Have a good QB, decent Def.
7)UF-Looked good....competition weak.
8)Aub-Def looks stout, QB play may be a concern. Scheduled a quality opponent.
9)Tenn- RB's looked good, BGreen moved the ball at will though.
10)USce- Have a lot of issues. Scheduled quality opponent
11)Missouri- Looked adequate. Weak competition too.
12)Kent-Stanley Williams looked good. Same ole Def however.
13)LSU-Did not get to see them. I am sure they will jump into the top 5 soon.
14)Vandy- Terrible
#5-8 could go either way....