Or forcing green technology?
Comment: This can be done through education of the citizenry, and not by the use of forced bankruptcy.
Our citizens should be provided the least expensive fuel options available. This is what a government, who takes money from its citizens, is suppose to do.
If climate is such a big issue, continue the technology to provide cleaner gas production and motor efficiency as the movement towards electric goes foreword.
Then we can place the mounting problem of discarded vehicle batteries in the lap of future generations who will probably decide to convert back to fossil fuels.
Is the point abortion, the act of killing something, or women’s health?
Comment: Abortion and health are two totally separate issues outside of .0000001 of situations where life of mother is in questions.
So giving it a cute name like womens healthcare makes not sense.
If it is womens healthcare, like need for climate protection in vehicle fuels, we should look for and demand the most efficient and save methods of contraception. After all, the hormonal, physical, emotional and mental health of the woman is challenged as pregnancy occurs. Logic would dictate contraception to stop the harmful effects of pregnancy.
If a woman is capable of scheduling an abortion, a woman is capable of accessing free contraception. If the point is healthcare.
To promote abortion makes no sense in the realm of healthcare. As with climate issues and forcing citizens to find alternatives, we should make contraception a widely available option.
Unless the point isn’t healthcare…..
Then it becomes a demonic approach towards the insignificant value of human life.
And many are sucked into the delusional idea of it being a woman’s right.
Comment: This can be done through education of the citizenry, and not by the use of forced bankruptcy.
Our citizens should be provided the least expensive fuel options available. This is what a government, who takes money from its citizens, is suppose to do.
If climate is such a big issue, continue the technology to provide cleaner gas production and motor efficiency as the movement towards electric goes foreword.
Then we can place the mounting problem of discarded vehicle batteries in the lap of future generations who will probably decide to convert back to fossil fuels.
Is the point abortion, the act of killing something, or women’s health?
Comment: Abortion and health are two totally separate issues outside of .0000001 of situations where life of mother is in questions.
So giving it a cute name like womens healthcare makes not sense.
If it is womens healthcare, like need for climate protection in vehicle fuels, we should look for and demand the most efficient and save methods of contraception. After all, the hormonal, physical, emotional and mental health of the woman is challenged as pregnancy occurs. Logic would dictate contraception to stop the harmful effects of pregnancy.
If a woman is capable of scheduling an abortion, a woman is capable of accessing free contraception. If the point is healthcare.
To promote abortion makes no sense in the realm of healthcare. As with climate issues and forcing citizens to find alternatives, we should make contraception a widely available option.
Unless the point isn’t healthcare…..
Then it becomes a demonic approach towards the insignificant value of human life.
And many are sucked into the delusional idea of it being a woman’s right.
