Does Kill Chain address the introduction of paper ballots in GA for the 2020 election, because that would seem to address much of what the movie identifies as risks to the integrity of the voting process.
I haven’t been able to find much about ongoing election lawsuits in GA. Any links would be much appreciated.
As a participant in the Maricopa audit process, do you believe the results proved Trump won AZ?
If not, do you take issue with Trump’s statements that the audit proves he won the state?
I don't think they do, but Harri Hursti has raised a flag about the barcode printed ballot, which does not allow the voter to see their vote. That really defeats the purpose of producing a paper ballot from the Dominion system.
Interesting that you don't see coverage of the elections cases in Georgia. The most active has been the case against Fulton County election officials by Garland Favorito and VoterGA. The case belongs to Fulton Superior Court, but is being heard in Henry County by Superior Court Judge Brian Amero. The Case was originally filed as Favorito v. Cooney.
The key judgment issued in the case, so far is a judgment ordering mail-in ballots to be unsealed for inspection by petitioner. Under the ruling, the petitioner is allowed to inspect and scan the ballots. Since then, all the wrangling has been about establishing the protocols for this to take place. The county officials have retained criminal attorneys to defend their case.
The other case is VoterGA v. Gwinnett County Board of Elections. That case is also about gaining access to inspect ballots. You can find information on both cases
here, the VoterGA website.
There is also a new case against the state over the Dominion Ballot Marking Devices. That one has been filed but hasn't had a court date, yet.
I am still trying to get my head around everything in the Maricopa County audit. That was a preliminary report and doesn't include work still being done on signature envelopes (copies turned over 3 weeks ago) where the county provided poor quality, low resolution copies.
There is still security data that hasn't been turned over (router logs, Splunk security logs). There are also unresolved problems with data deleted from the EMS workstations before they were turned over. The county claims to have copies of the data they deleted or overwrote, but did not turn them over in response to the subpoenas.
We now find that there are a lot of things not included in the Senate report, but the original version was much more harsh toward the county. An exhibit that didn't make the final cut was a list of laws broken by county officials, cross referenced to relevant audit findings.
My favorite one is this: there were 18,000 voters, who cast ballots in the November election, who were deleted from the county's voter registration system between Nov. 7th and December 4th.
They mentioned that ballots were printed on 10 different types of paper, but left out the following. Statute requires that in person, on demand ballots be printed on Rolland VoteSecure paper, 80-100#. The audit found over 164K ballots from in -person voting printed on standard quality paper with no security features and thin enough for marker ink to bleed through.
There is a lot of stuff that the Senate Judiciary Committee deleted from the public report and turned over to the state Attorney General for investigation, instead.
In Summary, the audit proved that there are more issues with Maricopa County's handling of the election than the margin of victory. Georgia state law requires that if such a thing happened there, you could not certify the election results. That seems to be a prudent concept.
I don't think anyone should be claiming victory in Arizona.
