This statement from a Supreme Court Justice about First Amendment should concern everyone

[CoastalVADawg]

The whole purpose of the US Constituion is to protect the rights of the people and put a fence around the govt. What this Justice basically said is the First Amendment restrictions on govt is dangerous and that the govt should determine what constitutes dangerous speech/misinformation. My goodness.

 

[55dawg]

The whole purpose of the US Constituion is to protect the rights of the people and put a fence around the govt. What this Justice basically said is the First Amendment restrictions on govt is dangerous and that the govt should determine what constitutes dangerous speech/misinformation. My goodness.

View embedded media

She is very dumb.

 

[CoastalVADawg]

She is very dumb.

No she is not. She knows exactly what she is doing and it is dangerous.

 

[TivoliDawg]

She is very dumb.

She is the token justice. A complete airhead.

I didn’t agree with O’Vonnor or Ginsberg, but they weren’t airheads.

 

[DTwnDawg]

Would expect nothing less from the same unqualified nut job that couldnt give the definition of a woman …all she does is meet a quota

 

[oldmandawg]

Would expect nothing less from the same unqualified nut job that couldnt give the definition of a woman …all she does is meet a quota

Diversity is our strength!

 

[JackRussellDawg]

Jumanji was a bad movie, and apparently the sequel is bad as well.

 

[Double Deuce Dawg]

What do you expect from someone who depended on the government to solve their problems for a good portion of their life?

 

[CoastalVADawg]

 

[OriginalGatorHator]

The whole purpose of the US Constituion is to protect the rights of the people and put a fence around the govt. What this Justice basically said is the First Amendment restrictions on govt is dangerous and that the govt should determine what constitutes dangerous speech/misinformation. My goodness.

View embedded media

the Constituion is gonna be pissed when it hears about this.

 

[poorpreacher]

My goodness

The next thing you know, people will want crazy things like freedom of religion, the press, and the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[poorpreacher]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

It doesn't say "under certain circumstances", it says "shall make no law"

 

[DTwnDawg]

It’s comical to watch idiots cheer for a justice system that’s pure communism

 

[OlecountryDawg]

Well she couldn’t define a man or woman. Not all that shocking.

 

[OriginalGatorHator]

Wait people are surprised that the same Court that redefined what marriage means isn’t going to be stalwart defenders of your right to express right wing ideology?

 

[ugafish]

No she is not. She knows exactly what she is doing and it is dangerous.

Are you saying she is acting?