ADVERTISEMENT

Well more bad news for Hydro and the Climate change flat earthers..

Yup, it's a vast conspiracy instigated by...NOAA. NASA's involved too, which makes sense since they fake Moon landings and conceal aliens in the Nevada desert. Daily Caller. Sheesh.
Facts are facts even when you do not agree with them. We are trying to bring the truth to the argument, but truth can't bee seen when someone will not accept the facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rolodawg2011
Yup, it's a vast conspiracy instigated by...NOAA. NASA's involved too, which makes sense since they fake Moon landings and conceal aliens in the Nevada desert. Daily Caller. Sheesh.

Well, they do report to a boss that has an agenda. When you revise the data by changing the metrics as to how the temperature data is gathered, it looks questionable.
 
Well, they do report to a boss that has an agenda. When you revise the data by changing the metrics as to how the temperature data is gathered, it looks questionable.
Wait, let me understand your point: I assume by boss you mean the President because, well, Benghazi, but you think that the POTUS is directing NOAA (and NASA and every U.S and international University and working group) to mislead the world in order to...what? Destroy the world economy, because..why? Amazing that he's been able to so greatly impact work that started well before he took office. I love conspiracy nuts!
 
Facts are facts even when you do not agree with them. We are trying to bring the truth to the argument, but truth can't bee seen when someone will not accept the facts.
Dismissing the discussion of the results as a grand coverup and conspiracy is not presenting facts; it's back seat driving...in a clown car. Hey, The National Enquirer is said to have definitive proof of the existence of The Bat Boy! Better grab your copy.
 
Dismissing the discussion of the results as a grand coverup and conspiracy is not presenting facts; it's back seat driving...in a clown car. Hey, The National Enquirer is said to have definitive proof of the existence of The Bat Boy! Better grab your copy.


ROTFLMAO, Look at what this guy has been reduced too. You sir are the court jester
 
Wait, let me understand your point: I assume by boss you mean the President because, well, Benghazi, but you think that the POTUS is directing NOAA (and NASA and every U.S and international University and working group) to mislead the world in order to...what? Destroy the world economy, because..why? Amazing that he's been able to so greatly impact work that started well before he took office. I love conspiracy nuts!

Well, they do report to a boss that has an agenda. When you revise the data by changing the metrics as to how the temperature data is gathered, it looks questionable.

Pretty quick Hydro. You have to admit that this President's record on truthfulness is, well, lacking. I think there are some studies with merit and some that are political. If you don't think this president pushes a political agenda you haven't been paying attention to the immigration debate and executive orders. Or energy policy. Or the recent EPA water grab. Or the regulatory 2nd Amendment grab. The social experiment military policy. It goes on and on. Everything with this president is about pushing forward his agenda. If you are not on board with his political agenda you are gone. So if you take a leftist agenda that many in academia support with a president whose agenda leans to the extreme left on top of a currupt UN, you have reasons to be skeptical.

That being said, I am sure there are unbiased and sound studies out there that validate climate change to some degree, but it is hard to determine the real danger and the real solutions in light of the hypocrisy and fraud with things like carbon taxes from people who chose to fly their private jets everywhere they go.
 
Pretty quick Hydro. You have to admit that this President's record on truthfulness is, well, lacking. I think there are some studies with merit and some that are political. If you don't think this president pushes a political agenda you haven't been paying attention to the immigration debate and executive orders. Or energy policy. Or the recent EPA water grab. Or the regulatory 2nd Amendment grab. The social experiment military policy. It goes on and on. Everything with this president is about pushing forward his agenda. If you are not on board with his political agenda you are gone. So if you take a leftist agenda that many in academia support with a president whose agenda leans to the extreme left on top of a currupt UN, you have reasons to be skeptical.

That being said, I am sure there are unbiased and sound studies out there that validate climate change to some degree, but it is hard to determine the real danger and the real solutions in light of the hypocrisy and fraud with things like carbon taxes from people who chose to fly their private jets everywhere they go.
Wait, a POTUS ....with an AGENDA! Outrageous! The silliness begins with the assertion that part of that agenda is the intentional destruction of the economy, aided, apparently, by leading a global disinformation campaign about adverse impacts to the climate...that miraculously predates his administration. By the way, you can't simultaneously assert that the climate is not threatened by the burning of fossil fuels, hamstring any research into alternatives, and then complain when a person uses the current fuel source until said alternative is achieved. Well, you can, the right does it all the time, but not and keep any shred of credibility. Again, it's the tobacco playbook all over again.

Second Amendment: so when your gun was confiscated, what did that feel like? Plus, did you read the EPA directive on waterways? Well versed in the connectivity pf hydrologic systems? More: by military social experiment do you mean allowing gay people to serve openly instead of just serve (got a friend, gay, retired after 20 as a Navy Commander. Everyone knew, nobody cared). Was integrating the military also just a social experiment or should our Armed Forces not accurately reflect our ideals?
 
So if the facts about global warming are so obvious then why did NOAA ( the experts) have to reset the data to prove that climate is warming...when the way they collected data b4 showed the temps had stalled for the previous 19 yrs..
According to NOAA they switched to an updated database for ocean temps, one that has fewer errors due to differing methods of collection, and used a larger weather station database. The hiatus was so fragile to begin with that the extra data wiped it out. Or, they're conspiring with ISIS to force a modern caliphate. Believe which ever you want.
 
Wait, a POTUS ....with an AGENDA! Outrageous! The silliness begins with the assertion that part of that agenda is the intentional destruction of the economy, aided, apparently, by leading a global disinformation campaign about adverse impacts to the climate...that miraculously predates his administration. By the way, you can't simultaneously assert that the climate is not threatened by the burning of fossil fuels, hamstring any research into alternatives, and then complain when a person uses the current fuel source until said alternative is achieved. Well, you can, the right does it all the time, but not and keep any shred of credibility. Again, it's the tobacco playbook all over again.

Second Amendment: so when your gun was confiscated, what did that feel like? Plus, did you read the EPA directive on waterways? Well versed in the connectivity pf hydrologic systems? More: by military social experiment do you mean allowing gay people to serve openly instead of just serve (got a friend, gay, retired after 20 as a Navy Commander. Everyone knew, nobody cared). Was integrating the military also just a social experiment or should our Armed Forces not accurately reflect our ideals?
Can't even begin to know how you must feel, realizing your hero is a total fraud! Answer this if you were someone trying to destroy the US and the capitalist economy what would you do any differently to destroy it. Not much more that has already happened under this asshats reign.
 
According to NOAA they switched to an updated database for ocean temps, one that has fewer errors due to differing methods of collection, and used a larger weather station database. The hiatus was so fragile to begin with that the extra data wiped it out. Or, they're conspiring with ISIS to force a modern caliphate. Believe which ever you want.

I'll take the latter answer, that seems much more logical liberal fantasy boy!
 
Can't even begin to know how you must feel, realizing your hero is a total fraud! Answer this if you were someone trying to destroy the US and the capitalist economy what would you do any differently to destroy it. Not much more that has already happened under this asshats reign.
Hmmm, well if I wanted to do MASSIVE damage...I'd vote Republican. Worked in 2000.
 
According to NOAA they switched to an updated database for ocean temps, one that has fewer errors due to differing methods of collection, and used a larger weather station database. The hiatus was so fragile to begin with that the extra data wiped it out. Or, they're conspiring with ISIS to force a modern caliphate. Believe which ever you want.

So the data from the past 19 years was bad data b/c of the collection method or b/c it did not support global warming?
ok..Since the data showed the stall..they change the method in collection and Hey....new data supports the warming trend over the past 19 years..Interesting..see they knew it all along just that pesky bad
data..
When I conduct a scientific experiment I sure would like to throw out all the bad data, blame it on my methods of collection, that does not support my hypothesis. Certainly would make me look smarter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oakridgedawg
According to NOAA they switched to an updated database for ocean temps, one that has fewer errors due to differing methods of collection, and used a larger weather station database. The hiatus was so fragile to begin with that the extra data wiped it out. Or, they're conspiring with ISIS to force a modern caliphate. Believe which ever you want.
Lol, pal the whole history of this hoax is errors, iNAME 5 things in the history of these flat earth ears they've ever be right on?
 
So the data from the past 19 years was bad data b/c of the collection method or b/c it did not support global warming?
ok..Since the data showed the stall..they change the method in collection and Hey....new data supports the warming trend over the past 19 years..Interesting..see they knew it all along just that pesky bad
data..
When I conduct a scientific experiment I sure would like to throw out all the bad data, blame it on my methods of collection, that does not support my hypothesis. Certainly would make me look smarter.
But their computer models are still in conflict with actual sat data. Believe what you're told not what you see
 
So the data from the past 19 years was bad data b/c of the collection method or b/c it did not support global warming?
ok..Since the data showed the stall..they change the method in collection and Hey....new data supports the warming trend over the past 19 years..Interesting..see they knew it all along just that pesky bad
data..
When I conduct a scientific experiment I sure would like to throw out all the bad data, blame it on my methods of collection, that does not support my hypothesis. Certainly would make me look smarter.
Didn't throw out data, added more. Again, believe in the conspiracy theory if that helps you sleep at night; doesn't change anything.
 
Wait, a POTUS ....with an AGENDA! Outrageous! The silliness begins with the assertion that part of that agenda is the intentional destruction of the economy, aided, apparently, by leading a global disinformation campaign about adverse impacts to the climate...that miraculously predates his administration. By the way, you can't simultaneously assert that the climate is not threatened by the burning of fossil fuels, hamstring any research into alternatives, and then complain when a person uses the current fuel source until said alternative is achieved. Well, you can, the right does it all the time, but not and keep any shred of credibility. Again, it's the tobacco playbook all over again.

Second Amendment: so when your gun was confiscated, what did that feel like? Plus, did you read the EPA directive on waterways? Well versed in the connectivity pf hydrologic systems? More: by military social experiment do you mean allowing gay people to serve openly instead of just serve (got a friend, gay, retired after 20 as a Navy Commander. Everyone knew, nobody cared). Was integrating the military also just a social experiment or should our Armed Forces not accurately reflect our ideals?
Ahem, the military was RE-SEGREGATED by Woodrow Wilson, a luminary to the progressive left. It cost us dearly that units during the Second World War were still segregated. While you carp to the rest of us about being ignorant, why don't you take some time and read a history book. As to the EPA, just another un-Constitutional bureaucracy. Each state has their own agency. The Federal version is completely agenda driven, and should be scrapped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rolodawg2011
Exactly as their emails confirmed . Add more to get the results they needed.
Wouldn't want them to admit that their methods were.......I'd say flawed, but that would indicate that they made a mistake. They set out to prove a hypothesis, which is wrong to start with, and Hydro knows it, and got caught fudging the data. Any thinking human has to ask why? There's only one logical answer and that is MONEY
 
Wait, a POTUS ....with an AGENDA! Outrageous! The silliness begins with the assertion that part of that agenda is the intentional destruction of the economy, aided, apparently, by leading a global disinformation campaign about adverse impacts to the climate...that miraculously predates his administration. By the way, you can't simultaneously assert that the climate is not threatened by the burning of fossil fuels, hamstring any research into alternatives, and then complain when a person uses the current fuel source until said alternative is achieved. Well, you can, the right does it all the time, but not and keep any shred of credibility. Again, it's the tobacco playbook all over again.

Second Amendment: so when your gun was confiscated, what did that feel like? Plus, did you read the EPA directive on waterways? Well versed in the connectivity pf hydrologic systems? More: by military social experiment do you mean allowing gay people to serve openly instead of just serve (got a friend, gay, retired after 20 as a Navy Commander. Everyone knew, nobody cared). Was integrating the military also just a social experiment or should our Armed Forces not accurately reflect our ideals?

It's certainly okay to have an agenda, but not okay to circumvent all known practices to push something that the majority of Americans are in disagreement with (as in going around Congress with executive orders used in an entirely different manner than ever before in our history and in creating regulations to backdoor your agenda that you can't get through Congress (the people's representatives). And who said anything about the intentional destruction of the economy? Though he is doing a pretty good job of that as well with his extreme EPA views. Just today his own EPA said that fracking was safe for water, but he will still oppose it as he is beholding to environmental extremists groups. The same game he has played with the keystone pipeline after three different environmental impact studies by his own administration has said it was safe (though he will continue to lie about that as well). We all know if predates his administration. This has been a pet project of the left for 30+ years. Mind you the drastic predictions never come true, but that doesn't stop the hysteria.

As for alternatives, good grief, your president just wasted untold billions on grants into alternatives (mostly to his cronies) that have had minimal effect on energy usage. Of course we wasted billions of tax dollars on these efforts with many companies that are now bankrupt. I guess we all know Obama has never been a businessman now.

You miss the entire point on the 2nd amendment power grab. I'll make it easy for you. Obama could not get a law through Congress on his firearm's proposals even when it was a majority Democrat Congress, so know he is just creating regulatory law to limit access as much as possible, trying to limit ammunition and of course doing the backdoor DOJ operation chokepoint to pressure banks into not providing loans to gun shops. (Smells of the IRS scandal doesn't it?). It's an end run around Congress and smacks of a dictator just doing whatever he damn well pleases. Are you really proud of this?

As for the EPA, this is just another big government power grab. Now I know you liberals completely trust and love big government to solve all of our problems, but for them to have say so on every drop of water in this country, so that they can regulate, fine and punish the citizenry is overreaching and scary. Soon no one will be able to use the water on their own property because big brother says so.

The military has been having a purge of the leadership. Either you get in line with Big Brother or you get forced to retire. This is problematic. There is no a political litmus test to stay in the military. It is beyond gays in the military. it's transgendered rights, its women in every conceivable role regardless of combat effectiveness, it's Christian persecution and the push of other religions in the military. It's getting disciplined for truthful, but politically incorrect training. Once again, it's all about the progressive agenda, not about the mission or combat effectiveness. Of course having a commander in chief who never served, but thinks he is smarter than all of his military advisers is probably part of the problem.
 
It's certainly okay to have an agenda, but not okay to circumvent all known practices to push something that the majority of Americans are in disagreement with (as in going around Congress with executive orders used in an entirely different manner than ever before in our history and in creating regulations to backdoor your agenda that you can't get through Congress (the people's representatives). And who said anything about the intentional destruction of the economy? Though he is doing a pretty good job of that as well with his extreme EPA views. Just today his own EPA said that fracking was safe for water, but he will still oppose it as he is beholding to environmental extremists groups. The same game he has played with the keystone pipeline after three different environmental impact studies by his own administration has said it was safe (though he will continue to lie about that as well). We all know if predates his administration. This has been a pet project of the left for 30+ years. Mind you the drastic predictions never come true, but that doesn't stop the hysteria.

As for alternatives, good grief, your president just wasted untold billions on grants into alternatives (mostly to his cronies) that have had minimal effect on energy usage. Of course we wasted billions of tax dollars on these efforts with many companies that are now bankrupt. I guess we all know Obama has never been a businessman now.

You miss the entire point on the 2nd amendment power grab. I'll make it easy for you. Obama could not get a law through Congress on his firearm's proposals even when it was a majority Democrat Congress, so know he is just creating regulatory law to limit access as much as possible, trying to limit ammunition and of course doing the backdoor DOJ operation chokepoint to pressure banks into not providing loans to gun shops. (Smells of the IRS scandal doesn't it?). It's an end run around Congress and smacks of a dictator just doing whatever he damn well pleases. Are you really proud of this?

As for the EPA, this is just another big government power grab. Now I know you liberals completely trust and love big government to solve all of our problems, but for them to have say so on every drop of water in this country, so that they can regulate, fine and punish the citizenry is overreaching and scary. Soon no one will be able to use the water on their own property because big brother says so.

The military has been having a purge of the leadership. Either you get in line with Big Brother or you get forced to retire. This is problematic. There is no a political litmus test to stay in the military. It is beyond gays in the military. it's transgendered rights, its women in every conceivable role regardless of combat effectiveness, it's Christian persecution and the push of other religions in the military. It's getting disciplined for truthful, but politically incorrect training. Once again, it's all about the progressive agenda, not about the mission or combat effectiveness. Of course having a commander in chief who never served, but thinks he is smarter than all of his military advisers is probably part of the problem.
WOW. I didn't think it was possible to put that all so succinctly. Of course, you could have just said Progressive Agenda and leave it at that.
 
I'll keep this short and to the point (long- winded on an iPhone is a pain): you see nefarious intent in everything being done, I see progress toward a country living up to its ideals; you see this as a Christian nation that has lost its way, I see it as one outgrowing that nonsense. It's as simple as that.
 
It's certainly okay to have an agenda, but not okay to circumvent all known practices to push something that the majority of Americans are in disagreement with (as in going around Congress with executive orders used in an entirely different manner than ever before in our history and in creating regulations to backdoor your agenda that you can't get through Congress (the people's representatives). And who said anything about the intentional destruction of the economy? Though he is doing a pretty good job of that as well with his extreme EPA views. Just today his own EPA said that fracking was safe for water, but he will still oppose it as he is beholding to environmental extremists groups. The same game he has played with the keystone pipeline after three different environmental impact studies by his own administration has said it was safe (though he will continue to lie about that as well). We all know if predates his administration. This has been a pet project of the left for 30+ years. Mind you the drastic predictions never come true, but that doesn't stop the hysteria.

As for alternatives, good grief, your president just wasted untold billions on grants into alternatives (mostly to his cronies) that have had minimal effect on energy usage. Of course we wasted billions of tax dollars on these efforts with many companies that are now bankrupt. I guess we all know Obama has never been a businessman now.

You miss the entire point on the 2nd amendment power grab. I'll make it easy for you. Obama could not get a law through Congress on his firearm's proposals even when it was a majority Democrat Congress, so know he is just creating regulatory law to limit access as much as possible, trying to limit ammunition and of course doing the backdoor DOJ operation chokepoint to pressure banks into not providing loans to gun shops. (Smells of the IRS scandal doesn't it?). It's an end run around Congress and smacks of a dictator just doing whatever he damn well pleases. Are you really proud of this?

As for the EPA, this is just another big government power grab. Now I know you liberals completely trust and love big government to solve all of our problems, but for them to have say so on every drop of water in this country, so that they can regulate, fine and punish the citizenry is overreaching and scary. Soon no one will be able to use the water on their own property because big brother says so.

The military has been having a purge of the leadership. Either you get in line with Big Brother or you get forced to retire. This is problematic. There is no a political litmus test to stay in the military. It is beyond gays in the military. it's transgendered rights, its women in every conceivable role regardless of combat effectiveness, it's Christian persecution and the push of other religions in the military. It's getting disciplined for truthful, but politically incorrect training. Once again, it's all about the progressive agenda, not about the mission or combat effectiveness. Of course having a commander in chief who never served, but thinks he is smarter than all of his military advisers is probably part of the problem.
By the way, the EPA did not say that' fracking was ''safe for drinking water'; they said they didn't find widespread impact but did find localized contamination resulting from it. The science isn't difficult and not surprising for anyone who's ever installed a well.
 
I'll keep this short and to the point (long- winded on an iPhone is a pain): you see nefarious intent in everything being done, I see progress toward a country living up to its ideals; you see this as a Christian nation that has lost its way, I see it as one outgrowing that nonsense. It's as simple as that.

In other words, corruption, lying to the public, the ends justify the means as long as it supports your progressive agenda. Got it. Somehow, I think you would feel quite differently if a conservative were pulling this shi-ite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1966septemberdawg
In other words, corruption, lying to the public, the ends justify the means as long as it supports your progressive agenda. Got it. Somehow, I think you would feel quite differently if a conservative were pulling this shi-ite.
Yes, it's a shit-storm of corruption and graft: just ask the good folks at Fox. Also, likely satanic and/or Muslim shenanigans per Jones and Beck. It's a wonder, and a testament to the restraint of the ethical and intellectual heavyweights of a Tea Party dominated House, that he hasn't been impeached.
 
Yes, it's a shit-storm of corruption and graft: just ask the good folks at Fox. Also, likely satanic and/or Muslim shenanigans per Jones and Beck. It's a wonder, and a testament to the restraint of the ethical and intellectual heavyweights of a Tea Party dominated House, that he hasn't been impeached.

Well said.
 
And your statement implies you can't falsify results by adding data. You can. Ever take a statistics course guy? Apparently not.
No, you inferred that, leading to a false conclusion (a couple, one generic the other subject specific).
 
Good night Hydro,
Is your solar powered night light working, I would hate to think you will face the night
That question was meant for the grown ups.
I thought I was debating a grown-up, evidently not. You can continue to spout off your "scientific Principles" but the fact is your leaders have skewed the controls, data and data collection to get the results they want. We can clearly see this because we are open minded to see the facts and weigh the information. The conclusion is you and your kind hate a US where education, hard work and honesty are some of the principles that define the American dream. Can't make it on your own petition big brother to take from the evil rich (It's not fair that someone has more than you, is it?) . The best days of this once great nation are now behind us but what a great ride it was, this great experiment in Freedom and self governance has proven that power corrupts the politicians and the citizens pay dearly for the evil that men do in the name of Progress.
You hone those debating skills by first doing some research of your own and draw your own conclusions, not what msnbc or cnn told you to think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg to the Bone
You forgot to mention trucks. And Mama. Oh, and trains. Never gonna make it writin' country songs, son, if'n you don't mention trucks, Mama, and trains! Meaning, it's real hard to take you seriously when you begin with such cliched, Southern-man assumptions.
 
You forgot to mention trucks. And Mama. Oh, and trains. Never gonna make it writin' country songs, son, if'n you don't mention trucks, Mama, and trains! Meaning, it's real hard to take you seriously when you begin with such cliched, Southern-man assumptions.
How did what he said become a southern cliche? You have no idea where he's from, or me for that matter. Every time somebody calls you on your nitwitery, you pull out the ultimate cliche, the fall back position of the left, name calling. What are you going to do next, play the race card?
 
How did what he said become a southern cliche? You have no idea where he's from, or me for that matter. Every time somebody calls you on your nitwitery, you pull out the ultimate cliche, the fall back position of the left, name calling. What are you going to do next, play the race card?

Hydro seems well educated but is a walking cliche of the left. All things progressive are great. Big government is great. Obama is great. Bush bad. Republicans are all right wing extremists christian pigs.
 
You forgot to mention trucks. And Mama. Oh, and trains. Never gonna make it writin' country songs, son, if'n you don't mention trucks, Mama, and trains! Meaning, it's real hard to take you seriously when you begin with such cliched, Southern-man assumptions.
I only wish this was a song it is a lot more serious than music. Remember without the brave protectors of this nation standing guard the arts can not flourish.
 
I only wish this was a song it is a lot more serious than music. Remember without the brave protectors of this nation standing guard the arts can not flourish.
They're a bunch of baby killers, and all our foreign policy problems are our own fault. If we were just nice to everybody, then they would be nice too. Pay for schools, have a bake sale for a bomber. Useful idiots, that's what they are.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT