Josh Pate basically called it a hit piece. Kinda rare a journalist points back at a journalist these days.
What are your thoughts on the AJC's integrity? Do you trust what they write about UGA?
Obviously if a fan complains, lots of posters will jump in and mock people and say they are homers (aka fans). And will suggest fans are always naive.
But has the AJC, specific to the recent report been being objective? And going back a bit, in general are they? Or is there a pattern?
If it is some sort of hit or miss thing, who is the ultimate person responsible at the AJC for making sure articles aren't hit pieces?
And when they are, does the media have accountability beyond just subscribers or can they just write whatever they want as long as it makes money? Asking from a legal perspective beyond the specific individual having to sue them. In theory could a class action lawsuit be made against them by "readers" if they mislead and lie a lot?
@dayneyoung @Radi Nabulsi @Anthony Dasher @JedMay @Ben Bachmann @PaulMaharry
What are your thoughts on the AJC's integrity? Do you trust what they write about UGA?
Obviously if a fan complains, lots of posters will jump in and mock people and say they are homers (aka fans). And will suggest fans are always naive.
But has the AJC, specific to the recent report been being objective? And going back a bit, in general are they? Or is there a pattern?
If it is some sort of hit or miss thing, who is the ultimate person responsible at the AJC for making sure articles aren't hit pieces?
And when they are, does the media have accountability beyond just subscribers or can they just write whatever they want as long as it makes money? Asking from a legal perspective beyond the specific individual having to sue them. In theory could a class action lawsuit be made against them by "readers" if they mislead and lie a lot?
@dayneyoung @Radi Nabulsi @Anthony Dasher @JedMay @Ben Bachmann @PaulMaharry
