…and now he has a watershed moment on his hands when trust in the media (justified or not) is basically at an all-time low
is there a lot of truth to what alan judd has reported with regards to UGA incidents collectively? 100%
is confidence in his reporting eroded when it comes to light that he was forced to resign a previous position for alleged ‘fabrications,’ and with UGA demanding a retraction with a strongly-worded 9-page letter from General Counsel? also 100%
is this a pattern from Judd? I would imagine the AJC is trying to figure that out right now
either way, the new Editor in Chief faces a huge business ethics dilemma, as the potential repercussions may go way beyond this story…is it enough to lean on ‘daylight’ (as @donalsonville_dawg called it) between actual quotes what was published/represented? will they double down and risk further subscriber loss and possible legal action? would they acknowledge some minor mistakes/errors in the reporting but stand behind Judd’s narrative?
will be fascinating to see it all unfold in the next few weeks…
is there a lot of truth to what alan judd has reported with regards to UGA incidents collectively? 100%
is confidence in his reporting eroded when it comes to light that he was forced to resign a previous position for alleged ‘fabrications,’ and with UGA demanding a retraction with a strongly-worded 9-page letter from General Counsel? also 100%
is this a pattern from Judd? I would imagine the AJC is trying to figure that out right now
either way, the new Editor in Chief faces a huge business ethics dilemma, as the potential repercussions may go way beyond this story…is it enough to lean on ‘daylight’ (as @donalsonville_dawg called it) between actual quotes what was published/represented? will they double down and risk further subscriber loss and possible legal action? would they acknowledge some minor mistakes/errors in the reporting but stand behind Judd’s narrative?
will be fascinating to see it all unfold in the next few weeks…
