on so many levels? Maybe I am missing something here.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/30/u...0000-for-his-foundation.html?smid=nytpolitics
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/30/u...0000-for-his-foundation.html?smid=nytpolitics
Is it just me or does this seem wrong
- Thread starter Radi Nabulsi
- Start date
It's not just you. These are the slimiest POS political couple we have seen since barrack and michelle. It is disgusting I am doing great things for your charity, but pay me lots of money.
Haven't you heard she's running to "help" the middle class. Hillary and "Shakedown" Bill took in 30 Million in 2014. Her name should be Hypocrisy Rodham Clinton.
Unfortunately since Bill doubled his "fees" while she was Sec of State it would be naive for anyone to think that influence hasn't already been sold and in a recent interview Bill said he had no intention of stopping his "speaking engagements"even if Hillary does get elected. A scary thought.
Look up how much of their donations go to charity and how much goes to salaries and administrative cost. One is at the 10% level or less. Why did Chelsea Clinton leave a $600,000 a year job at NBC, with little responsibility, to work at the "charity". I wouldn't trust the Happy Hearts "charity" either if they are paying a speaker $500,000.
The Clintons, Just the slimest low lifes anyone could ever imagine.......But it doesn't matter to liberals. The ends justify the means
The clintons will not spin there way out when they meet their maker. All that money will not help them at that time.
