Let’s see, did it require testimony under oath for you libs to get sucked in in the Russia collusion hoax?
Surprise J6 hearing today and a bonus surprise
- Thread starter Dawg 'n IT
- Start date
The people that are ate up are the ones that would rather see the country implode and go back to the dark ages without electricity and autos are any of the modern niceties than have Trump as president. Nothing he did was close to what you describe. Did he believe he was cheated, yes. Was he cheated, maybe. Will we ever know for sure? NO. They will never let it be known. It will be hidden if he was. If it ever got out that the election was actually stollen, that would be the end of our democracy that the TDS suffers claim he was causing. Be honest with yourself, Let’s say all the things that happened were in reverse. Your moron was leading, then all the crap that was pulled I. Wisconsin and Fulton County and AZ happened and Trump suddenly found all these votes in the middle of the night. Then video and phone pings show multiple mulls stuffing boxes, forging signatures etc. and Trump comes out of nowhere to win. Dims would have screamed bloody murder. We would still maybe not have a president. Don’t say dims haven’t done such. That’s easy. The only difference is a few hundred people went to the capital. Did Trump leave when he was supposed to? Yes. He fought and tried hard to keep the job because he believes he was cheated.
Your hate for one man’s personality has you and others like you willing to turn America into a third world country. Your hate for Trump won’t let you see the forest for the trees.
Why don’t you and will (you 2 are exactly alike) jump in here and tell us about all the things your boy is saying about the Supreme Court, even while on foreign soil. Y’all drone on and on about Trump being a threat to our form of govt yet not a word about the threat by the dims to one of the branches. Not a word of criticism by your boy about the personal attacks on some of the judges by the baby murdering hoard! Y’all turn a blind eye if it’s not about Trump.
I’m one finger typing on my phone so there is much more I want to say but will stop here. And before you say it, I am not a Trump lover. I Did Not vote for him in the Primary. Yes I voted for him twice for president because I love my country to much to see it turned into a cesspool of baby blood, perverted sexual deviation, and child trannies by the dimwit party. Yes, if he is the nominee I will vote for him again. Not because I am all about Trump. I am about this country and I saw first hand what his policies did for us in comparison to now. I also think the current dim party with its thirst for baby blood and perversion of all kinds is morally reprehensible and should be ground to ashes. It will burn in hell but unless time ends soon it may be too late for this country.
@willdup you always seem to ignore these facts. Thoughts? Your thoughts if the parties were reversed...love to see you spin this one
Oh, he will spin it. Everything is fair as long as it’s anti Trump. He takes opposite sides of an issue depending on who is being discussed. His latest doozy is now everything has to be under oath to be beloved, (the girls 3 hand hearsay testimony) vs the folks actually there for example, but yet he took a a foreigners (steel) word against the president of the USA. He blows whichever way is anti Trump.
It seems like he wants no part of this now all in the suddden
You obviously aren't keeping up with this and don't understand what's happening here. You're not the one making the decisions here. I'd take a listen to the lead FOX News attorney if I were you. BTW, a guy who felt there wasn't enough to convict Trump in the Senate during his first impeachment.
I would also add that the Republicans didn't want anyone on the committee that was seen as middle of the road on the issue. They nominated Jordan I think, who may end up being asked to testify and was heavily involved with Meadows and Trump as all of this was going down. Can't remember who the other one was, but it was people they knew Pelosi would reject. They wanted this to be seen as an all anti-Trump committee so they could make the case you're making now.
But later, you'll get your wish. This isn't a real trial.
Last edited:
When you can’t defend your position just go juvenile. Typical dim.
I was wrong, Jordan has already been issued a subpoena. And that's who the Republicans wanted on the committee. Go figure.
Don’t be dense. He will not be cross examining ANYONE. That’s why Pelosi would not allow ANY non Rino’s or Republicans who did not hate Trump on the committee. She could not risk that. That’s why this whole thing is a one sided show trial/witch hunt with ZERO legitimacy. If the parties were reversed and they were going after lying Obama you would be saying the same thing. Don’t be a total hypocrite. Be the one Democrat who is not one.
And once again, you claim to discuss, but you attack the guy who wrote the post. That's not a discussion. I think I'm done here. There are Savannah songs to play.
