move to enter into an “agreement” with the WHO ceding legally binding control of vital elements of our country’s healthcare protocols to that organization? Your administration has structured the “agreement” in a way to avoid 2/3 Senate approval as required by the Constitution for treaties, because it certainly could not muster the 66 required votes to become law. Additionally…….
“This WHO CA+, which functions as a treaty, has gone through an opaque process of negotiation and amendments ever since, from which the public has been essentially excluded, with the goal of signing it this year.”
The only good thing I see about this is the dems will take it up the keester with the rest of us. Any of you in favor of WHO-ordered lockdowns and enforced vaccinations of whatever they concoct?
“This WHO CA+, which functions as a treaty, has gone through an opaque process of negotiation and amendments ever since, from which the public has been essentially excluded, with the goal of signing it this year.”
The only good thing I see about this is the dems will take it up the keester with the rest of us. Any of you in favor of WHO-ordered lockdowns and enforced vaccinations of whatever they concoct?
Last edited: