If science really was able to predict and map global warming/change , then those models would be consistent and virtually identical, which they're not. And posting this in response to my challenge is a deflection. The claims from climate alarmists have been consistently wrong. Florida being underwater, the polar ice completely disappearing, polar bears going extinct and storms getting more frequent and intense. None have come true. In addition, CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas and it's required for plant growth. And no one has been able to say what the ideal temperature of the earth should be be. So if we are truly in a climate emergency, why hasn't one dire prediction come even close to being true?I found this to make a convincing defense of the most significant climate models since 1973.
Analysis: How well have climate models projected global warming? | Carbon Brief
Scientists have been making projections of future global warming using climate models of increasing complexity for the past four decades.www.carbonbrief.org
To quote Joe Biden, Come on, man. If you aren’t knowledgeable enough to have a basic understanding of the scientific method than you really should sit this one out. I suspect you also believe that because Fauchi and the global research community didn’t get everything right about Covid in March that we should dismiss everything they are saying now. That’s not how science works.
Just watch Al Gores movie and read the predictions from the first Earth day. Then read the Green New Deal. After you do that we'll talk. I'm still waiting for the optimum global temperature and why and how you come up with it. By the way, I have more than enough real scientific sources that were not paid to regurgitate politically biased science. So don't come back to me with Bill Nye the science guy.
Imagine being foolish enough to think humans can alter the climate of a planet that has been around for billions of years
Imagine being oblivious to think humans haven't had an effect on the climate.
So by that line of thinking, do you believe humans have been the cause of extinctions of flora and fauna that were the result of many millions of years of evolution? If you agree, help me understand the difference.
Yes, there have always been cycles. But there haven't always been humans to effect those cycles in negative ways. See how simple that is.
Imagine believing you can change the earth's climate by regulating one compound.
Education is a state issue not federal. Please take it up with your state taxing authority and ask them to increase your property taxes. Better yet voluntarily give more money to your local school system.
Hoax, the USA has less greenhouse emissions than any industrial country, our stupidity is India and CCP gain. Have fun when the dollar is no longer the global standard currency.
Because Atlanta and Nashville are fed off spur pipelines that cost extra to ship on. Refiners chose not to send product up those pipelines and incur the extra cost because they had better lower cost alternatives. Margin increased by not shipping on those lines.
If you aren’t genuine enough to acknowledge that climate change legislation is about creating a tax, government theft, then you don’t understand how the economic process works.
Can you provide a source on this?
You continue to deflect. The issue is climate is such an imminent threat we have to destroy jobs and businesses if we don't act now. Not make a reasoned transition to an actual energy source that works . But stop doing what we're doing now because the planet is going to die in a few years. And there is zero evidence in that is true. And all of the "world is going to end" predictions have not even come close to materializing. Yet you are ok with stop using a reliable energy source in order to feel good. You haven't proven and can't prove that we're all going to die in a few years if we don't act. And you can't prove it because every predicton has been wrong. There is not one child that will graduate from college with a doctorate that has ever experienced global warming. And you can't cite any of the alarmists predictions that will prove it will happen. In addition, you won't address any of the issues I presented in a simple text.
So what are we talking about then? You made my point. Shutting down the pipeline is stupid.
I’m very happy we moved beyond this view for medicine and other aspects of human life
Georgia (or wherever you live) makes up a very small part of the world and sharing local anecdotal evidence demonstrates you don't understand the topic of climate change, at all.
Is that supposed to be
I normally don't attack posters but you haven't made one intelligent post on this subject. Which means resorting to personal attacks is your only thing left.
according to NASA we actually ended up tied for warmest by the end of the year. The WMO had it #3 in early Dec.
2020 Tied for Warmest Year on Record, NASA Analysis Shows
Earth’s global average surface temperature in 2020 tied with 2016 as the warmest year on record, according to an analysis by NASA.www.nasa.gov
2020 on track to be one of three warmest years on record
Climate change continued its relentless march in 2020, which is on track to be one of the three warmest years on record. 2011-2020 will be the warmest decade on record, with the warmest six years all being since 2015, according to the World Meteorological Organization.public.wmo.int
Are you a Christian Scientist? Based on your statement, I assume you don't seek any modern medical care and leave it all in God's hands.
