There are nut jobs on both sides, but you knew this……right?
What do you think about the pro baby killers threating violence and even attempting an assassination of a supreme court justice? This post just highlights your hypocrisy. I admit I have been on vacation and while I tried to keep up I was on a gulet for 6 days without internet and may have missed it, but you to the best of my knowledge have not posted one darn thing about the threats to our republic being made by dim pols and baby murdering hoards against the supreme court and the threats of left wingers like Janes Revenge for "nights of rage" etc.
Not surprised that you would agree with Mr. Bias himself. You TDS sufferers are laughable.
He’s not just a hypocrite…he’s unashamed of being one.
yeah, its a better term than the one you libs use to describe conservative blacks. Your party is awash with virtue signaling raciest idiots.
I am absolutely against threats or acts of violence, including against politicians. There are no exceptions, I've never suggested anything other than that on here and I spoke against the violence and looting that happened in '20 as it was happening.
No. Not complex at all. Neither is it complex to see that you only speak out against one side of the political spectrum. You give general comments to say you are against this or that but you only directly condemn one side (mostly as an association to one person) and lump everyone on that side into the same bucket.
You still have not condemned ANY of the actions of the dims including the 2016 dim nominee for the hoax they pulled that not only was a coup attempt, wasted millions of tax payer dollars? Are you really unable to comprehend we are sick and tired of your one sided attacks and deflections. Your party spent 5 years trying to oust the duly elected president by CROOKED LYING MEANS. You have no problem with that so stop your belly aching about what djt did or didn't do. Until you can comprehend that and have some honest discussion then no one should listen to a word you say.
I appreciate that. These people on here have gone completely over the top with the derangement. They then totally ignore every crooked illegal act of the dims in an attempt to overthrow the election of 2016. I have never seen one of them condemn the attempted murder of a supreme court justice, much less the protest at their personal homes. They cry and act like giant baby stinky pants over trumps russia collusion even still today in spite of the fact that has been proven to be a LIE put forward by their party's nominee. IT is disgusting the amount of hypocrisy that they exhibit. There is no way to have a real discussion with people so out of touch with truth and honesty. All they want is what all dims want. They just want to be in power. They don't care what they have to do, what law they have to break, what lie they have to tell, etc etc etc and the dims and libs of this site applaud them for doing so.
I'm a lib? How do you know that? I don't play your partisan politics with either side. Believe it or not there's quite a world out there beyond your two boxes.
Any reasonable person would interpret the ad as you have. The problem is that the most extreme 10% or more on both sides of the political spectrum have completely lost their damn minds and political violence is increasing. It would be great to see our leaders condemn and marginalize those who should so obviously be condemned and marginalized, but most of them are gutless hypocrites and opportunists.
It is a response from taking the temperature in the room. Being memorable seems to sell now. Put something out there crazy enough to get you noticed. Then slowly backup and hope people like what they see and hear when you become real. Dan Crenshaw is a very smart human being. He absolutely obliterated mahre on his show. His first ad is absolutely ridiculous. It was fantastic, but ridiculous. Trump started this pattern. Say what most will not. I don’t like threatening violence. The first video of our current governor was of his truck. And his idea to round up illegals. This is the new wave. Trump, aoc, the swuad, Marjorie. Some show they have substance. Some prove to be actually nuts. It has worked for them, so the copycats have continued with tradition.
I have noticed he has taken some heat from his own party members. To have signed on to running that ad, the guy’s judgment is too clouded to serve as dogcatcher. Geez, a Duke grad, Rhodes scholar, and a SEAL. Maybe the SEAL trainers left him in the hypoxia tank too long.
My original post was about the current leader in a race for the US senate using brazenly violent imagery at a time when violence is on the increase. I don’t mention the Dems because there is no equivalent use of violent imagery in a campaign ad. One party has to a significant degree contributed to the mainstreaming of violent rhetoric and that’s the republicans and specifically the wing of the party that supports Trump, who BTW is the presumptive nominee for the presidency in 2024 until he says otherwise. This ad even targets other republicans who refuse to enthusiastically support Trump, which is as clear of an example of facism as we can find during a time when there are plenty of other examples.
Okay….I’ll play. Here are just a few examples:
I'm sorry, but if you are getting bored why don't you go back and read the post you quoted. Which of these is a campaign ad? I'm not condoning those statements, but this is a typical response when one can't respond directly to what was said.
Not sure if this is tongue in cheek. But if someone says tell me of a case on a Tuesday where this particular office said this particular thing in this particular medium…then you’re right. I failed. If we talk about inappropriate usage of power from political figures inciting violence or negative action by the populace…then I think I captured the bigger point. And the biggest point and truly the only point being made, if you are outraged about one party doing this then get mad at your own for doing the same thing.
But the other party is apparently not using violence in their campaign ads and that was the point here (doesn't matter if it's not the biggest point to you) and you didn't respond to that. This ad is drawing a lot of national attention if you aren't aware. In an earlier post you mention "deflection" - congrats.
The problem there is that those are all soundbites taken in the heat of the moment after Trump did something or said something about them. Trump has pushed us into this kind of raw bickering between politicians with his own conduct. These people did not act like this before he got in there and it's a problem of fighting fire with fire.
It is thrown around too much. Like calling a dem, a limousine Democrat. It is really supposed to describe a lot of voters this past election. Even a few on this board. Who claim to have conservative views yet could somehow vote for Biden or Bernie. Or not vote at all. Rino is the only way to describe that. As an insult, it just keeps expanding its definition. Imo
Aren’t you being cute. I was addressing a single individual directly on the inconsistency of another poster. That poster addressed me directly and that started a broader conversation between us.
Your last few sentences were easily the best of your post. A compromised man we have now elected. A vp more incompetent than Dan Quayle. Several career politicians who make a couple hundred thousand a year that are now worth multi millions. A real estate mogul and reality tv star. He has to be in the mix too. My grandfather had Alzheimer’s before he passed. He still knows where he was more than slojo does on a daily basis. And twice as active.
Well, I think both sides learn from each other.
More about the person & platform than the party……but I tell you this, I sure as hayul didn’t vote for Biden.
Oh the irony of a Democrat posting about political violence. Holy crap that's rich.
Oh the irony of a non-Democrat not responding to the post, but deflecting once again. That's rich.
That's what you Democrats do on 4/5's of the posts on this forum. Oh the irony of you having the gall to make an issue of it. That's rich.
I'm not a Democrat and when did I do it? You were talking to me, right?
