Mini Mike isn't the savior they thought he'd be, looks like Crazy Bernie will be the nominee . The only question left is will the Dems win more than two states?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mini Mike isn't the savior they thought he'd be, looks like Crazy Bernie will be the nominee . The only question left is will the Dems win more than two states?
Fiscal lib or not doesn’t really matter. You’re just a lib. Your overview of last night is pretty good. Although, house is in play no matter who the lib nominee is.Not a fiscal lib, but you guys think I am so here goes:
Last night was a total disaster for the Dems
Bloomberg’s only hope is to give the DNC a billion dollars in return for them canceling the rest of the debates
Bernie’s to lose now.
Speaking of losing, House is definitely in play if Bernie is the nominee.
Trump has to be laughing his ass off
Anybody who wants to spend government taxpayer-supplied funds on housing and care for illegal aliens, Medicare for all, free tuition, free abortions, and homo partner benefits is a fiscal lib. You can NOT be a social lib, which you admit to being, without being a fiscal lib. Where do you thing the money is going to come from to support all your social program horseshit? It has to be either higher taxes and/or larger budget and deficit, both of which are hallmarks of fiscal liberalism. Time for you to end the charade.Not a fiscal lib, but you guys think I am so here goes:
Well damn. Ok, we agreeNot a fiscal lib, but you guys think I am so here goes:
Last night was a total disaster for the Dems
Bloomberg’s only hope is to give the DNC a billion dollars in return for them canceling the rest of the debates
Bernie’s to lose now.
Speaking of losing, House is definitely in play if Bernie is the nominee.
Trump has to be laughing his ass off
Anybody who wants to spend government taxpayer-supplied funds on housing and care for illegal aliens, Medicare for all, free tuition, free abortions, and homo partner benefits is a fiscal lib. You can NOT be a social lib, which you admit to being, without being a fiscal lib. Where do you thing the money is going to come from to support all your social program horseshit? It has to be either higher taxes and/or larger budget and deficit, both of which are hallmarks of fiscal liberalism. Time for you to end the charade.
Yeah, I've always laughed when people claim to be socially liberal and fiscally conservative, its like what Dice Clay said about being Bi Sexual. You either suck d or you don't
Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.You can NOT be a social lib, which you admit to being, without being a fiscal lib.
Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
Not allowing assault weapons, not sure how that costs tax dollars.
My definition of social lib revolves around those issues, and not getting free stuff like college tuition, Medicare for all, etc. When my tax dollars start being dolled out for a bunch of freebies, I view that as being a fiscal issue, and you are I are much more in agreement there than you probably think.
Have a good one.
Hopefully, they're gone for good. Like when you flush a turd. In our country, which was built on capitalism, hard work and individual responsibility, our plumbing system works.Mini Mike isn't the savior they thought he'd be, looks like Crazy Bernie will be the nominee . The only question left is will the Dems win more than two states?
"Berry Strange". a new Netflix film soon to be release starring 0612. 65Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
Not allowing assault weapons, not sure how that costs tax dollars.
My definition of social lib revolves around those issues, and not getting free stuff like college tuition, Medicare for all, etc. When my tax dollars start being dolled out for a bunch of freebies, I view that as being a fiscal issue, and you are I are much more in agreement there than you probably think.
Have a good one.
What is the difference in the rights of gays versus straight citizens?Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
Not allowing assault weapons, not sure how that costs tax dollars.
My definition of social lib revolves around those issues, and not getting free stuff like college tuition, Medicare for all, etc. When my tax dollars start being dolled out for a bunch of freebies, I view that as being a fiscal issue, and you are I are much more in agreement there than you probably think.
Have a good one.
Name a right straight folks have which gays do not. My God, man, you have espoused free shit for your worthless criminal "guests" time and time again, which COMPLETELY DISQUALIFIES you as a fiscal conservative and QUALIFIES you as the worst type of liberal, one who would destroy the integrity of the country. I'd rather have a discussion with Trim or Elevator than you; at least they acknowledge what they really stand for. You lie.Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
Not allowing assault weapons, not sure how that costs tax dollars.
My definition of social lib revolves around those issues, and not getting free stuff like college tuition, Medicare for all, etc. When my tax dollars start being dolled out for a bunch of freebies, I view that as being a fiscal issue, and you are I are much more in agreement there than you probably think.
Have a good one.
Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
Not allowing assault weapons, not sure how that costs tax dollars.
My definition of social lib revolves around those issues, and not getting free stuff like college tuition, Medicare for all, etc. When my tax dollars start being dolled out for a bunch of freebies, I view that as being a fiscal issue, and you are I are much more in agreement there than you probably think.
Have a good one.
Decisions, decisions, decisionsNever really understood the bi-sexual deal.
If a bi-sexual walks in a room and sees a world class weight lifter and a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model, which part of the "bi" takes charge?
Then whats your opinion on confused "xy athletes" competing against "clear-headed xx athletes"? IMO, the dims want to destroy Title IX by turning over women's sports championships to confused men.I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
.
"Assault weapons"Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
Not allowing assault weapons, not sure how that costs tax dollars.
My definition of social lib revolves around those issues, and not getting free stuff like college tuition, Medicare for all, etc. When my tax dollars start being dolled out for a bunch of freebies, I view that as being a fiscal issue, and you are I are much more in agreement there than you probably think.
Have a good one.
LOL, the dims will be lovin’ them some Sanders if/when he wins their nomination...we’ll find out he’s the best thing since sliced bread. There’s hardly a one of those dim politicians who wouldn’t vote Sanders over Trump. They are a pathetic bunch...Mini Mike isn't the savior they thought he'd be, looks like Crazy Bernie will be the nominee . The only question left is will the Dems win more than two states?
Respectfully disagree, I don't want any free stuff for gays, I just want them to be able to have the same rights as straight folks. I know you going to talk about spousal benefits for gay couples and that costs tax dollars. I guess it does, but again, no special programs here, just same rights as us straight folks.
Not allowing assault weapons, not sure how that costs tax dollars.t p
My definition of social lib revolves around those issues, and not getting free stuff like college tuition, Medicare for all, etc. When my tax dollars start being dolled out for a bunch of freebies, I view that as being a fiscal issue, and you are I are much more in agreement there than you probably think.
Have a good one.
No you only have a sports team representing your school. No girls BB or boys, just a BB team. If I was in school today I would be on the girls BB team I am 5 ‘7” I would rule. It is just a matter of time when this happens if things keep up this way. Congress is considering passing a law making it mandatory for this cross gender athletes to happen.Then whats your opinion on confused "xy athletes" competing against "clear-headed xx athletes"? IMO, the dims want to destroy Title IX by turning over women's sports championships to confused men.
Hoffman, here goes:Food,
Where do you stand on 1. taxes paying for Planned Parenthood, 2. section 8 housing with subsidies so high that the private sector can't compete, 3. job requirements for food stamps,4. black reparations and. trillions to fight climate change?
Hoffman, here goes:
1. I believe a women can decide what she wants to do with her body, and whatever decision she makes, she has to pay for it. Tax dollars should not be in play here.
2. I really know nothing about Section 8 housing, can't comment either way.
3. If the folks that provide the tax dollars (like you and I) for food stamps have to work, then the people getting our money should work as well.
4. Black reparations-Hell no, even though if it gets passed, when my ancestors came over (Scottish), I think we got put in some camps, so I should get a check too (Hope you can see the sarcasm in my response here, reparations are ridiculous).
Climate change-there needs to be some middle ground and some baby steps taken here, as climate change is real, but the answers to the problem don't just mean spending tons of money. As I have said before, the Dems want to throw trillions at climate change, but if you don't get China and India to come on board, it is just a total waste of money. Pubs response isn't much better, which is what climate change? This one is not easy, something needs to be done here, but I have no idea how to make it work. I do know that just throwing money blindly at a problem never works.
Have a good one.
1. Actually, there is somebody else's body in there, that she is deciding about. Isn't abortion about the innocent person getting killed, who cant speak for themselves?Hoffman, here goes:
1. I believe a women can decide what she wants to do with her body, and whatever decision she makes, she has to pay for it. Tax dollars should not be in play here.
2. I really know nothing about Section 8 housing, can't comment either way.
3. If the folks that provide the tax dollars (like you and I) for food stamps have to work, then the people getting our money should work as well.
4. Black reparations-Hell no, even though if it gets passed, when my ancestors came over (Scottish), I think we got put in some camps, so I should get a check too (Hope you can see the sarcasm in my response here, reparations are ridiculous).
Climate change-there needs to be some middle ground and some baby steps taken here, as climate change is real, but the answers to the problem don't just mean spending tons of money. As I have said before, the Dems want to throw trillions at climate change, but if you don't get China and India to come on board, it is just a total waste of money. Pubs response isn't much better, which is what climate change? This one is not easy, something needs to be done here, but I have no idea how to make it work. I do know that just throwing money blindly at a problem never works.
Have a good one.
Taxing hell out of every man, woman, and child on earth to alter the climate is a hallmark of a true fiscal conservative.Do you believe that politicians and a global tax can control the temp of the Earth?
Taxing hell out of every man, woman, and child on earth to alter the climate is a hallmark of a true fiscal conservative.
I do know that just throwing money blindly at a problem never works.
I quoted and replied to JBD's question he posed to you. I am sorry for the dig, but you have certainly painted a target on yourself.That was my last sentence in my response about climate change, so how in the hell did you come up with "Taxing hell out of..."