Interesting how most progressive liberal supporters go silent when you talk about spending taxpayer money.

[PotimusWillie]

And when you talk about who truly controls the taxpayers money.

We talk about funding this and that and sending billions to other countries. The U.S. is sending the money. The government is paying for this or subsidizing that.

But it is taking money from the taxpayer and selling the benevolence.

The taxpayer should only be forced to pay for programs that benefit the taxpayer, period.

An elected official should never be able to promise a check to anyone.

It’s not the governments money to give. It’s my money. Your money. It’s not theirs to give away.

This is where we have lost our minds.

 

[WyoDawg307]

And when you talk about who truly controls the taxpayers money.

We talk about funding this and that and sending billions to other countries. The U.S. is sending the money. The government is paying for this or subsidizing that.

But it is taking money from the taxpayer and selling the benevolence.

The taxpayer should only be forced to pay for programs that benefit the taxpayer, period.

An elected official should never be able to promise a check to anyone.

It’s not the governments money to give. It’s my money. Your money. It’s not theirs to give away.

This is where we have lost our minds.

Indeed and this is what many don't understand. This is what the fight for Speaker of the house is all about.

Apparently only 12 of the so-called Republican House rep's are against the continued spending on wars that voters don't want. Add Rand Paul in the Senate and that is all of the resistance to the DC Uni-party continuing to spend all of the money (that we don't even have) on more wars.