I'm careful not to speak in absolutes, but it's funny how involved parents have kids who thrive in their school, be it public or private. IMO, a lot of parents "feel" like they're doing something better for their kids by writing a massive check. And if you're spending a fortune, you damn well better convince yourself it's "better." Has anyone ever met a private school parent who confessed it hasn't been worth the money? They're all very eager to convince you it is.
The irony I've found going through the UGA application/admission process is most of the well-known private schools in Atlanta cap the number of AP classes students can take. Westminster as an example caps AP classes at 6. My oldest at Buford HS took 12 AP classes and got a 5 on 10/12 of AP exams (4 on other two). He's not some outlier, either - this is very common. He went through a significantly more rigorous HS curriculum...for free.
There are certainly some pros to private schools, but they also shelter kids, IMO. It's not the world they will be sent off to for college. Private schools tend to have smaller enrollments, too. With smaller numbers, they just aren't exposed to competition as much, with athletics probably being the most glaring example.
I prefer to be very involved in my kids' academic success so as to expose them to the real world, learning to work with a variety of demographics, and having to compete against a larger sample size. IMO, that's what prepares them for life. Manufacturing an environment just stunts that preparation.
Values are developed at home. If you're worried about that, you better not send them off to college.
The irony I've found going through the UGA application/admission process is most of the well-known private schools in Atlanta cap the number of AP classes students can take. Westminster as an example caps AP classes at 6. My oldest at Buford HS took 12 AP classes and got a 5 on 10/12 of AP exams (4 on other two). He's not some outlier, either - this is very common. He went through a significantly more rigorous HS curriculum...for free.
There are certainly some pros to private schools, but they also shelter kids, IMO. It's not the world they will be sent off to for college. Private schools tend to have smaller enrollments, too. With smaller numbers, they just aren't exposed to competition as much, with athletics probably being the most glaring example.
I prefer to be very involved in my kids' academic success so as to expose them to the real world, learning to work with a variety of demographics, and having to compete against a larger sample size. IMO, that's what prepares them for life. Manufacturing an environment just stunts that preparation.
Values are developed at home. If you're worried about that, you better not send them off to college.
Last edited: