Reading to Sankey's comments on Yahoo and listening to Ralph Russo this morning, there appears to be a groundswell of pretty significant changes coming in the 2026 season, and I think it could be beneficial to the sport. It's going to take some humility on the part of the ACC and Big 12, but they may not have a choice. It looks like the future could look something like this (and I don't hate it -- there are so many things to consider):
- 14 Team playoff with top 2 seeds getting byes (this would almost certainly be the B1G champ and SEC champ)
- 4 team guarantees for the SEC and B1G (in order of conference finish)
- 2 team guarantees for the ACC and Big 12 (in order of conference finish)
- 1 G5 champ
- 1 at-large (If ND is ranked in the top 14, it'd be them, but could also be anyone)
- 9 game schedules to get a clearer picture. You're not worried about accumulating losses because you're top 4 (or 2) in your standings are getting in no matter what.
- The encouragement to play strong OOC games. In the end, they don't really hurt you, but just can help you. If you lose, finish in the top 4 (or 2) in your league and you're fine. If you win it, it can really enhance your seeding.
- Conference championship games are replaced with Conference play-in games. You decided the Conference Champion the old fashioned way -- during the regular season. If you have a tie, who cares? Let 2 teams hang a banner. Dooley and Bryant have a bunch of shared SEC titles. So this year:
- SEC - Texas, Georgia, Tennessee - in; Bama vs. Ole Miss in the play in game
- B1G - Oregon, Penn St, Indiana - in; Ohio St. vs. Illinois in the play in game
- ACC - SMU in; Clemson vs. Miami in the play in game
- Big 12 - Arizona St in; BYU vs. Iowa St in the play in game
- Boise St in
- ND in
- There's your 14; Oregon and Texas would get the bye (but maybe not if we'd played 9 games and Texas had another more challenging game in there and lost -- then we'd have head to head)