really GAS if Trump paid a porn star to be quiet. Just like most didn't GAS about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.....or at least I didn't. I know that I vote for someone that is best for my wallet and will keep my family and I safe, Dem or Republican. Still think that Trump is the best choice between the two for that as of today.
But what I am not understanding is, other than all of this being political and having a possible corrupt judge, how they get to a guilty verdict if:
1) The statute of limitations has expired.
2) If all of these charges stem from the non-disclosure and Daniels denied all of it.....wouldn't that void everything??
3) And wasn't the non-disclosure signed after the election, rendering all of this useless (influencing an election)??
Really haven't been glued to my set and kept up with all of this like some, hopefully y'all can set me straight on the above. It will be interesting to see if the appellate court will make all of this go away....if it gets there, thinking it will.
.
But what I am not understanding is, other than all of this being political and having a possible corrupt judge, how they get to a guilty verdict if:
1) The statute of limitations has expired.
2) If all of these charges stem from the non-disclosure and Daniels denied all of it.....wouldn't that void everything??
3) And wasn't the non-disclosure signed after the election, rendering all of this useless (influencing an election)??
Really haven't been glued to my set and kept up with all of this like some, hopefully y'all can set me straight on the above. It will be interesting to see if the appellate court will make all of this go away....if it gets there, thinking it will.
.