I watched the hearings then and have watched sections of them since.
No you're not getting it, that's not what Thomas said during confirmation but his concurring opinion with today's ruling. That means they want same-sex marriage or other privacy rulings to come back up to them to be struck down as well. This is not hyperbole.
Nothing is coming at you. This SCOTUS follows the Constitution. We should all rejoice.
‘I mean - you can laugh...
Abortion-Travel Bans Are `Next Frontier’ With Roe Set to Topple
There’s a clear view of what a world without Roe v. Wade would look like in terms of the law because conservatives have been working for decades to limit abortion access.news.bloomberglaw.com
Thomas may want it but it will NEVER get by the majority. I hate same sex marriage but it does have some protection within the Constitution. I know for sure most of the majority of SCOTUS will not overturn that which has protection ... unlike the other 3 who are proven traitors to their oath.
No,Your Godliness should tell You that and I wish,no i don't, but i will say it anyway. I wish You had to walk in the shoes that those You speak about and deal with people like You..GO DAWGS
maybe you should read the dissent. It cites the same issues.
From the dissent: “Those responsible for the original Constitution, including the Fourteenth Amendment, did not perceive women as equals, and did not recognize women’s rights,” they write. “When the majority says that we must read our foundational charter as viewed at the time of ratification (except that we may also check it against the Dark Ages), it consigns women to second-class citizenship.”
Are you upset a few innocent babies lives might be saved? Not enough murder for you? Do you watch videos of the little arms and legs being raked are vacuumed out of the womb. What about needles to the brain. That excite you ?
other issues this will affect. Thomas has already said
"Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there. Emboldened anti-privacy advocates are already turning their attention to restricting access to other areas of reproductive health, marriage rights, and any number of issues that should be considered personal and off limits.
Also, some states are even pushing "Personhood Bills" that say life begins at contraception. This is personal to me because I had my son via IVF. In states where PB are enacted fertility clinics will particularly go out of business due to the embryos that are formed during the IVF process will now be considered "people" and due all the same protections. Thomas in is concurring opinions has said contraception and gay marriage should be relooked at...what limits are there now from government intervening into individual personal life.
Regardless of your personal opinion on abortions how can you have individual freedom without privacy from the government?
Commentary: Overturning Roe v. Wade is more than just an assault on reproductive rights
Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there.fortune.com
and covid shots?other issues this will affect. Thomas has already said
"Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there. Emboldened anti-privacy advocates are already turning their attention to restricting access to other areas of reproductive health, marriage rights, and any number of issues that should be considered personal and off limits.
Also, some states are even pushing "Personhood Bills" that say life begins at contraception. This is personal to me because I had my son via IVF. In states where PB are enacted fertility clinics will particularly go out of business due to the embryos that are formed during the IVF process will now be considered "people" and due all the same protections. Thomas in is concurring opinions has said contraception and gay marriage should be relooked at...what limits are there now from government intervening into individual personal life.
Regardless of your personal opinion on abortions how can you have individual freedom without privacy from the government?
Commentary: Overturning Roe v. Wade is more than just an assault on reproductive rights
Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there.
You get credit for identifying that RvW is not about abortion, but privacy. However, if I murder someone in the living room of my home, that is ‘in private’ but it’s still within the purview of the gov’t what I do there.other issues this will affect. Thomas has already said
"Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there. Emboldened anti-privacy advocates are already turning their attention to restricting access to other areas of reproductive health, marriage rights, and any number of issues that should be considered personal and off limits.
Also, some states are even pushing "Personhood Bills" that say life begins at contraception. This is personal to me because I had my son via IVF. In states where PB are enacted fertility clinics will particularly go out of business due to the embryos that are formed during the IVF process will now be considered "people" and due all the same protections. Thomas in is concurring opinions has said contraception and gay marriage should be relooked at...what limits are there now from government intervening into individual personal life.
Regardless of your personal opinion on abortions how can you have individual freedom without privacy from the government?
Commentary: Overturning Roe v. Wade is more than just an assault on reproductive rights
Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there.
Youre the one that approves of baby murder. I’ll gladly compare mine to yours. Lately I’ve searched Bible verses containing the phrase “not made with hands”, crappie fishing in nottely lake, how long it took to build the temple of Apollo in Didim Turkey, How much the marble columns weighed, and lies and violence by democrats. The last 2 items returned pages and pages.
The funny thing about Thomas, is most of those SC decisions he thinks were wrong and should go back to the states were decided around the same time the SC ruled that states didn't have the right to say who you married. Nebraska, where Thomas later married his wife, did not allow interracial marriage at the time. I wonder if he thinks that was also a bad SC decision.other issues this will affect. Thomas has already said
"Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there. Emboldened anti-privacy advocates are already turning their attention to restricting access to other areas of reproductive health, marriage rights, and any number of issues that should be considered personal and off limits.
Also, some states are even pushing "Personhood Bills" that say life begins at contraception. This is personal to me because I had my son via IVF. In states where PB are enacted fertility clinics will particularly go out of business due to the embryos that are formed during the IVF process will now be considered "people" and due all the same protections. Thomas in is concurring opinions has said contraception and gay marriage should be relooked at...what limits are there now from government intervening into individual personal life.
Regardless of your personal opinion on abortions how can you have individual freedom without privacy from the government?
Commentary: Overturning Roe v. Wade is more than just an assault on reproductive rights
Reproductive rights could be the first of the privacy rights to disappear for many Americans–but it won’t stop there.
You keep acting like the dissent has bearing on the issues. It is simply the loser's report. It would be the same way if the results were reversed. What they think is irrelevant.
I wonder who else it affect.? If Women,then Clarence better watch out things could change for Him
I value the mothers life first, and her right to choose second. I don't hate anyone.
Well, of course, you don't hate them just as no one hates women that think abortion should be banned.
Which parts of the US Constitution limit women's rights, or "consign women to second class citizenship?"
