I agree completely with Dawg WCK's statement above.
Just curious, should the cop's who were being attacked on Jan. 6 also have the right to pull their weapons and take out targets to protect themselves and property?
The fires that broke out at the capital building were not as intense and the police in Atlanta didn’t allow them entry like they did in Washington.
Fascinating at both sites. In Atlanta, the site had been targeted before and was a ticking time bomb, yet the police had to come in and stop the vandalism.
In Washington, in one of the most intensely guarded buildings in the world, a group of unorganized protesters came in the front door of the capital building?
I find it interesting that someone could think Jan 6th could happen without allowing it to happen. It is impossible. The police presence at the capital is beyond anything in any James Bond movie, yet a guy in caveman gear went in the front door and walked around.
The whole thing plays out like some B flick spy movie.
If a group stormed the capital they would be dead. But not only did the group enter, they were allowed to walk around. Like the Capital police were caught off guard……
We were given a tail wag the dog event.
When a totalitarian government has the power, they dictate the narrative to discredit opposition. In this case, the rally got used.
Oh yeah, there were no fires at the Capital. And why aren’t the police guarding the training site.
And why allow bomb throwing terrorists to stand without being shot?