This Admin never learns

[55dawg]

No, just watching the right flooding of the zone with bullshit (to quote Steve Bannon) before what is likely to be yet another tough week for Trump and his campaign.

I don't know much about the recently hired associate Coms director referenced above. I did see that his almost all of his offensive tweets were from during or just after his time as an undergraduate at UCLA. The guy isn't setting any policy, he is a coms guy and I don't really care what his views were as a student. I also don't care if he is gay, trans, whatever. Don't care.

Given this group wants to discuss the kind of people hired to support an administration, let's talk about some of DJT's team.

Since the tweets of the new associate WH Coms guy, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, Michael Flynn, Rick Gates, Michael Cohen, Peter Navaro and Elliott Broidy have all been convicted of felonies.

Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro and Jenna Ellis are under indictment and/or pled guilty for their efforts to support Trump's election fraud lies.

Allen Weisselberg, who was the Trump Org CFO and Trump's right hand man for twenty years, is currently serving time in Rikers for felonies.

All these people worked directly for Trump. They make up his team.

But sure, keep getting your panties in a wad about the new associate WH Coms director. That will definitely help save the country.

If only Rudy could straighten NY out again ?

 

[ToddBburn]

I can’t say and I don’t care in the least. Perhaps working with Trump inspires or requires criminal behavior. Evidence would suggest so. As I said, sleaze attracts sleaze.

I’ve gone through the list of things accomplished by the Biden administration more than once and you’ve heard them before, if not from me than from others. There nothing to gain from doing it again.

So far, the three primary things that Trump has told us to expect from his second andministrstion are more tariffs, mass deportations and a far more accommodating stance towards Russia regarding Ukraine. The first two will be highly inflationary and the last one leads to more war. And he’s going to purge the civil service after the loyalty test Project 2025 details.

I find all of that to be disastrous, and that’s without factoring in the tried to steal the election thing, which makes his candidacy a non-starter anyway.


They aren’t tenured and of course there is a process for the civil service to evaluate performance. It doesn’t include a political loyalty test as Project 2025 is proposing, and it shouldn’t.

When you work for the government, you trade current income for stability.

The reason that the majority of civil servants are protected from what is outlined in Project 2025 is because swapping out tens of thousands of functionaries with every administration would render the entire government ineffective. Yes, insert jokes here. Nonetheless, an ideological loyalty test is not where we need to go as a country.

Ineffective is what we need. Let the states do most of that crap. Too much bureaucracy as it is. I want them to do less spend less and only step in when needed.

 

[poochpup]

View embedded media

in other news:

 

[ugateke24]

They must be patrolling queer bars to find employees.

No these guys are bing snuck in their bedroom while the wife is gone.

Dem party really got highjack by perverts.

Then the gay movement got highjacked by the trannies. A lot of the gay community is upset about that.

But dems aren’t having to go outside their circle to find these people. Birds if a feather flack together.

 

[atlanta cock#]

Yes, I'm quite sure I'm not making an argument for lawfare. That esteemed list had different prosecutors, different grand juries, different judges and different juries, if they had a jury. Low character people tend to attract low character people and Trump seems to either bring out the worst in people (see list above) or they see him for who he is (see list of his former cabinet members who refuse to endorse him). There is one common thread here. DJT.

Regarding the rest of your argument, if you have an issue with an ideological test that leads to incompetence, you should learn more about Project 2025. The plan is to remove tens of thousands currently protected long-term members of the civil service and replace them with conservative loyalists. Oh, and the position on abortion and election integrity is also notable.

All the Dems have to do is get more airtime for this guy and the middle will continue to move to Biden, as we have been seeing for weeks.

View embedded media

You're quoting communists who also support Hamas. How can I take you seriously?

 

[willdup]

No these guys are bing snuck in their bedroom while the wife is gone.

Dem party really got highjack by perverts.

Then the gay movement got highjacked by the trannies. A lot of the gay community is upset about that.

But dems aren’t having to go outside their circle to find these people. Birds if a feather flack together.

Hijacked by perverts? Coming from the party that chose DJT to lead it, that is rich. Or maybe getting a quick BJ from a porn star while your third wife is home nursing your newborn or keeping a playboy bunny side piece for a year is just fine for you.

Should we check in on the latest from that stalwart GOP power couple in FL, Christian and Bridget Ziegler?

BTW, only one former Speaker of the House served jail time for hush money payments to a male minor he diddled, and he isn’t a Dem. Hush money payments for sexual misconduct seems to be a thing for the GOP.

 

[-lowcountrydawg]

Hijacked by perverts? Coming from the party that chose DJT to lead it, that is rich. Or maybe getting a quick BJ from a porn star while your third wife is home nursing your newborn or keeping a playboy bunny side piece for a year is just fine for you.

Should we check in on the latest from that stalwart GOP power couple in FL, Christian and Bridget Ziegler?

BTW, only one former Speaker of the House served jail time for hush money payments to a male minor he diddled, and he isn’t a Dem. Hush money payments for sexual misconduct seems to be a thing for the GOP.

And what does your gut tell you about this guy? Most qualified for the job?

What does your gut tell you about many of the hires across the admin and military? Optics? Or merit? The VP? Optics? Or most qualified?

Can you ever answer questions about the Biden admin without invoking Trump? I dare you. These two specific ones.

 

[willdup]

And what does your gut tell you about this guy? Most qualified for the job?

What does your gut tell you about many of the hires across the admin and military? Optics? Or merit? The VP? Optics? Or most qualified?

Can you ever answer questions about the Biden admin without invoking Trump? I dare you. These two specific ones.

Coms guy - likely optics, don't know enough to say.
Kamala - optics, but in defense of the choice, a big part of choosing your VP is about impact on winning the election, which Biden pulled off. Obviously, she becomes a much more important figure going into a second term.

 

[Don Ellis]

Yes, I'm quite sure I'm not making an argument for lawfare. That esteemed list had different prosecutors, different grand juries, different judges and different juries, if they had a jury. Low character people tend to attract low character people and Trump seems to either bring out the worst in people (see list above) or they see him for who he is (see list of his former cabinet members who refuse to endorse him). There is one common thread here. DJT.

Regarding the rest of your argument, if you have an issue with an ideological test that leads to incompetence, you should learn more about Project 2025. The plan is to remove tens of thousands currently protected long-term members of the civil service and replace them with conservative loyalists. Oh, and the position on abortion and election integrity is also notable.

All the Dems have to do is get more airtime for this guy and the middle will continue to move to Biden, as we have been seeing for weeks.

View embedded media

the funniest thing to me in this video is the refusal to use the term illegal alien.

Spin it into whatever phrase you want at the end of the day they are illegal

 

[willdup]

the funniest thing to me in this video is the refusal to use the term illegal alien.

Spin it into whatever phrase you want at the end of the day they are illegal

I agree. That is the kind of virtue signaling word games that annoy reasonable people with the left.

 

[-lowcountrydawg]

Coms guy - likely optics, don't know enough to say.
Kamala - optics, but in defense of the choice, a big part of choosing your VP is about impact on winning the election, which Biden pulled off. Obviously, she becomes a much more important figure going into a second term.

Fair enough. Thanks.

 

[Pine_Tree1]

The Joe Biden regime loves learning the hard way