Interesting thought. Surprised that hasn’t been discussed. Or has it ? But are we technically in a “dispute” and is that a requirement ?
I think dispute is pretty broadly defined.Interesting thought. Surprised that hasn’t been discussed. Or has it ? But are we technically in a “dispute” and is that a requirement ?
but that was different.......
Yeah, one made a bombastic statement in a debate. The other actually admitted meeting with a hostile foreign government.but that was different.......
Like how your party has shi+ all over the US Immigration Laws?
I don’t have a party.You mean l
Like how your party has shi+ all over the US Immigration Laws?
It's in the audio of the debate, but the former US Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama heard the same thing I did.Gotta link, Chief?
I haven't heard it anywhere, including MSNBC.It's in the audio of the debate, but the former US Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama heard the same thing I did.
I disagree with her though that just saying he's going to violate it is a criminal act in and of itself.
And a POTUS elect has some latitude that the average citizen doesn't enjoy. Of course, if Jack Smith thinks he can make a case...I haven't heard it anywhere, including MSNBC.
Stating his intention to violate federal lawI haven't heard it anywhere, including MSNBC.
Salon. 🤣🤣Stating his intention to violate federal law
He knows what it is, too. He called for John Kerry to be prosecuted under the Logan Act in 2019.
Which links to the transcript of the entire debate and quotes the Logan Act.Salon. 🤣🤣