Where all my Chat Democrats at who were so worried about threats to our democracy?
- Thread starter Savannah_Dawg
- Start date
Funny how the psycho lefties can never admit one case of wrongdoing. They believe they can never be wrong or admit one ounce of guilt or apologize for anything whatsoever. No matter how big, how small, how corrupt or how innocent, I’ve never heard one of these people take accountability for anything whatsoever, outside of fake news they create with lies. They are simply above ever being wrong in every case whatsoever
I get it, but when the government is talking about breaking up your company for antitrust reasons, with multiple federal regulators looking over you ready to make your life miserable, and the party in power (D) holds the Presidency, the Senate and the Congress, it becomes a lot more complicated.
I admitted I was dead wrong about Biden’s cognitive state twenty minutes into the debate, and I’ve admitted it multiple times since then. I’ve also taken ownership when I’ve posted bad information without properly fact checking it.
When have you admitted you were wrong?
We have been subjected to years of people on the Chat making absurd excuses for Trump’s behavior. If I cared to invest the time, I could go pull fifty posts telling us that the most documented mass crime in the country’s history wasn’t in any way what we all saw happen live and in hundreds of hours of video later. And that’s just one example.
As is often the case on here, your accusations are projection.
Last edited:
My response was way too charitable. I mean seriously, wow, you really have revised history here. Trump was removed from social media channels after inciting an insurrection. You are not changing that history. You have some massive balls to try though
The government pulls a lot of stuff because an amazing number of peeps have head in sand.
It doesn’t matter. Should not happen under any circumstances. Don’t listen. Move on. MSNBC just started playing his entire interviews again. This is how Charlottesville and other out of context things happened. People deciding for you what you should see. Make your own choice. If the choice is a bad one live with it.
Definite election interference which was pretty obvious to anyone with common sense and paying attention to current events
If I own a social media channel I’m not airing somebody inciting a violent mob- that’s my right.
Oh good lord. Then don’t air Kamala. She was bailing violent criminals out. One who shot into a crowd of police. He didn’t say go break into the capital and destroy some shit. They also took down the post of him trying to stop it. TDS. We shouldn’t air Maxine waters either like they did everywhere. Telling folks to accost people in restaurants.
That is some serious whataboutism there friend. Because she supported a nonprofit that help pay cash bonds (bonds set by judges) that is the equivalent of January 6? Ok buddy. I think you have TOS (Trump Obsessive Syndrome).
Zuck is the one squirming. You’re just playing cover and pretending it doesn’t mean anything to placate fears of your party’s loss of power
Admitting you were wrong about Biden after he drops out of the race buys you nothing. Alll
The leftyies here, including you, have supported him throughout his illegitimate presidency despite his mental decline and ineptitude being on full display.
For years.
Trump never told anyone to do anything, and even if he did, lefties need to accept the concept of thinking for oneself and personal accountability for one’s own actions, as opposed to blaming everything on someone they hate.
3 years ago is when the Biden Admin asked Zuckerberg to restrict information on his platform. It just come out recently through his interview that is was a the direct instruction of the WH. Never mind you will not be honest enough to look at this for what it is.
The timing and motives behind Zucks letter are interesting.
Jim Jordan could contribute significantly to the discussion by releasing the transcripts of the testimony of the multitude of Meta employees who appeared before his committee. For some reason, he has refused to do it.
He’s either waiting to drop it as an October surprise or he doesn’t have anything. I have an idea which it is.
The SCOTUS considered two cases that provided the opportunity to condemn the Biden administration’s efforts to impact messaging about Covid and so far has passed on both. It seems unlikely Jordan has some impactful evidence that he kept in reserve for October. Guess we will see.
I called Biden out during the debate, which was nearly a month before he withdrew.
Still waiting for a single example when you have admitted you were wrong.
Can you not be objective? This is the same crap happening on both sides. You and Will at times can be reasonable but you both have become very unreasonable lately.
Anyone covering for zucker definitely has a party
As well as being a member of the left/dem party. That’s how you vote.
There’s. Reason he admitted these things and said they won’t do it again. He knows something. Of course you/dems don’t like it. Social
Media platforms have been campaign tools for the dem party for some time.
There are a lot of things I can be reasonable about, but the revisionist history around what happened between November 2020 and January 6 is something that severely disturbs me.
Errors in responding quicker to the insurrection caused by Trump. Your point?
Whataboutism? You either allow posters to advance violence or you do not. If you are going to remove someone that says we're going to walk to the capital and peacefully protest when his constituency has no history of rioting, I'd say you have to ban people that literally call for their followers to harass citizens in restaurants, get up in their faces or state protests that have literally turned into riots, even autonomous zones and resulted in loss of life will not end should be removed as well.
As an attorney, I'm sure you know companies are liable if they do not enforce their written policies equitably. When it comes to whataboutism, I would imagine you've used conflicting standards being applied to different groups in court.
The continued defenders of democracy have successfully fought to keep RFK on the ballots in Michigan and Wisconsin. Why? The guy doesn't want to be on there. What possible reason could there be to keep him on? Why would democrats want to keep him on and fight so hard to do it? Democracy baby.
Biden/Harris Pressuring Mark Zuckerberg To Censor COVID Content Is Unforgivable | Burack
Mark Zuckerberg admits and says he regrets allowing Biden/Harris to pressure Meta to censor Covid content.www.outkick.com
and
Meta CEO admits Biden-Harris admin pressured company to censor Americans
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan that the Biden-Harris admin pressured Facebook to censor Americans.www.foxbusiness.com
And y'all want to elect this Marxist still? She won't even do a single interview or press conference. She's doing her best to back out of the debates even. Wake up Democrats.
Seems like Joe Biden had no problem getting himself off the ballot in favor of Kamala Harris.
To a liberal, whataboutism is their fancy buzzword for accountability, to which they are highly allergic.
I didn’t say it was equivalent. You said inciting a violent mob. Well, what in the hell do you think the summer of love was. Or do you still pretend it was mostly peaceful. She not only supported the violence, she supported something bailing out violent criminals. Will loses his mind over trump stating he will pardon the Jan 6 folks. He has said only the non violent. I would say that is a very easy connection to make.
