Bad choices among bad choices

[Boost Assendahm]

.....slowly but surely the lowest of the low information voters are coming to realize that the most ruthless, self serving candidate on the docket of either party is Hillary Clinton. Women and minoroties are slowly starting to see her for what she really is. Many are recognizing how foolish their penchant for voting based on emotion or gender or ethnicity has always been.

History teaches well. And more and more of them are looking back as well as forward to get a better grasp of the big picture, the droning reality of the same repetitive promises, emotional platitudes of nurturing that are simply never fulfilled. These tired, old appeals to emotion and solidarity never change nor do they bring change.

They're nothing more than pompous pickup lines that would be laughed out of a bar, and are now being treated with equal disdain in our political settings. These traditional bloc voters, who yearn primarily to be nurtured and/or protected are starting to get it.

Telling folks you understand them, that you stand with them (until the voting's done) has become an all too empty cheer from the cheap seats. Do something. Get into the game, and stop whining about it all. Wishing and waiting and hoping for outside intervention have never worked very well.

 

[Lewis & Herschel]

What does it matter as the voters on the left have no standards. They will vote for anyone.

 

[Boost Assendahm]

What does it matter as the voters on the left have no standards. They will vote for anyone.

because those voters, women, minorities and sometimes the 18-25 crowd (when they actually vote) are typically the deciding, "emotionally motivated" segments when the "liberals" win elections.....but they're starting to wise up.

 

[DawgMaticFan]

Clearly this idea and wording of ''low information voters'' has an original source. Does anybody here know who started this ball rolling ? It's really everywhere these days.

 

[DawgMaticFan]

because those voters, women, minorities and sometimes the 18-25 crowd (when they actually vote) are typically the deciding, "emotionally motivated" segments when the "liberals" win elections.....but they're starting to wise up.

I don't see any ''wising up'' of any segment of ''wing'' dwellers on either side. Even the gist of this thread was contrived by whoever pulled the string.

 

[whitepug6]

I don't see any ''wising up'' of any segment of ''wing'' dwellers on either side. Even the gist of this thread was contrived by whoever pulled the string.

If history has taught us anything, it's that the American people will elect a crook over a kook every time. It must suck to be a fan of the Reptilican Klown Show.