Farrakhan calls for 10,000 volunteers to stalk and kill whites

[oletex]

I removed this thread since a couple of hijackers want to deny there is evil in the world and cast aspersions upon those who report the vulgarity such as espousing murder, encouraging the less stable among us to become murderers as LF so openly did. BTW to the deniers whose only defense to evil is cry for a LINK! Try your google option and punch in the title line to this post and see the tons of reports of this incident. I used their exact verbage. The truly disturbing thing is LF has obviously found that most people, black and white just want to get along so he has given up on creating a massive up rising and race war and goes for the extreme, hoping to find 10,000. One of the relatives of the Charleston 9 are worth 1 million Farrakhans.

 

[Thenumber34]

He's a coward. If he had any balls at all, he would fire the first shot.

Blacks don't want to start a war they know they can't win.

 

[Fivehade]

Louis Farrakhan spoke at Mt Zion Baptist in Miami and called for 10K black volunteers to stalk and kill whites. And he did so repeatedly and pointedly and the troubling part is he did it and received a standing ovation in a Christian Church. He called for murdering whites and a race war.

The administration will be endorsing the act if they don't act to immediately curb his impassioned call for domestic terrorism. He is a dangerous domestic terrorist and the blood of slain Americans shall be on his hands and the hands of those in positions of power and responsibility who fail to act. As it is people will suffer and die by his actions. Enough already of any sort of calls for violence based upon race or religion coming from any corner.

I didn't see anything about him suggesting whites people were the target .... Looks like he said to rise up against the people that's killing blacks people.... Wouldn't that be black thugs ?

 

[UgaTom]

I didn't see anything about him suggesting whites people were the target .... Looks like he said to rise up against the people that's killing blacks people.... Wouldn't that be black thugs ?

This doesn't suggest that white people are the targets?

Death is sweeter than continuing to live and bury our children while the white folks give our killers hamburgers. Death is sweeter than watching us slaughter each other to the joy of a 400-year-old enemy.

 

[FeralDawg]

What does he have against hamburgers?

 

[CountryClubDawg]

Alveda King, imo, has it 100% correct:

Alveda King, an evangelist and pro-life advocate with Priests for Life, said the Islamic leader should take a cue from her uncle, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

"I would pray to remind Minister Farrakhan that my Uncle Martin Luther King, Jr. once said that 'we must all learn to live together as brothers [and sisters], or perish as fools.' Violence begets more violence," King told WND. "Nonviolent albeit brave and courageous conflict resolution has proven to be very effective throughout the ages. Living by the sword or other human weapons of destruction cause death by the same."

Farrakhan's assumption that the "federal government" should intervene in the affairs of black people is misplaced, she said.

"The government cannot deliver a people, only God can do that," King said. "We must pray to live and not die to declare the works and Word of the Lord."


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/farrakhans-call-to-kill-white-cops-is-it-legal/#5ivBrMCg0KEE5sPE.99

 

[CountryClubDawg]

What does he have against hamburgers?

I was wondering the same thing.

 

[UgaTom]

What does he have against hamburgers?

LOL...good question.

 

[Modoc Joe]

This doesn't suggest that white people are the targets?

Death is sweeter than continuing to live and bury our children while the white folks give our killers hamburgers. Death is sweeter than watching us slaughter each other to the joy of a 400-year-old enemy.

Im with fivehade...the only time he mentions white people is during the delivery of hamburgers. But why are white people giving out hamburgers to black people anyway?

 

[UGAly]

Louis Farrakhan spoke at Mt Zion Baptist in Miami and called for 10K black volunteers to stalk and kill whites. And he did so repeatedly and pointedly and the troubling part is he did it and received a standing ovation in a Christian Church. He called for murdering whites and a race war.

The administration will be endorsing the act if they don't act to immediately curb his impassioned call for domestic terrorism. He is a dangerous domestic terrorist and the blood of slain Americans shall be on his hands and the hands of those in positions of power and responsibility who fail to act. As it is people will suffer and die by his actions. Enough already of any sort of calls for violence based upon race or religion coming from any corner. Ad those who capitalize on hate for political power. This just after the country received the blessing of the relatives of the Charleston 9. So sad.

And this administration wants to disarm us.

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

This doesn't suggest that white people are the targets?

Death is sweeter than continuing to live and bury our children while the white folks give our killers hamburgers. Death is sweeter than watching us slaughter each other to the joy of a 400-year-old enemy.

The "give our killers hamburgers" comment refers to the police taking Dylann Roof to Burger King so I would assume he's talking about anyone who would murder blacks based on race (probably includes reference to lynchings too).

The "watching us slaughter each other" comment seems pretty obviously targeted towards black aggressors in black-on-black crime who are doing far more damage than 400 year old history of racism ever did.

So it seems that he's asking for volunteers to stand up against those who seek to harm "good" black folks. Can't really argue with that. The original post was kind of dangerous with all the speculation without a link to the direct quotes.

 

[Modoc Joe]

The "give our killers hamburgers" comment refers to the police taking Dylann Roof to Burger King so I would assume he's talking about anyone who would murder blacks based on race (probably includes reference to lynchings too).

The "watching us slaughter each other" comment seems pretty obviously targeted towards black aggressors in black-on-black crime who are doing far more damage than 400 year old history of racism ever did.

So it seems that he's asking for volunteers to stand up against those who seek to harm "good" black folks. Can't really argue with that. The original post was kind of dangerous with all the speculation without a link to the direct quotes.

I'm pretty sure they didn't take Dylann Roof to Burger King ....I understood that they went and got Burger King burgers because they have to feed somebody in custody

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

I'm pretty sure they didn't take Dylann Roof to Burger King ....I understood that they went and got Burger King burgers because they have to feed somebody in custody

Fine, just stating what the hamburger comment was referencing.

 

[Modoc Joe]

Fine, just stating what the hamburger comment was referencing.

Yeah, ok...makes sense now, but I still didn't see anywhere that the whacko said they were gonna go out and kill white people

 

[UgaTom]

The "give our killers hamburgers" comment refers to the police taking Dylann Roof to Burger King so I would assume he's talking about anyone who would murder blacks based on race (probably includes reference to lynchings too).

The "watching us slaughter each other" comment seems pretty obviously targeted towards black aggressors in black-on-black crime who are doing far more damage than 400 year old history of racism ever did.

So it seems that he's asking for volunteers to stand up against those who seek to harm "good" black folks. Can't really argue with that. The original post was kind of dangerous with all the speculation without a link to the direct quotes.

He specifically used the word "enemy." There's no doubt who the 400-year old enemy is. It's a stretch to think that he's talking about black-on-black crime. He's asking why are black people killing each other to the delight of whites. By your logic, he's asking black people to kill the black people who kill other black people.

 

[Thenumber34]

He specifically used the word "enemy." There's no doubt who the 400-year old enemy is. It's a stretch to think that he's talking about black-on-black crime. He's asking why are black people killing each other to the delight of whites. By your logic, he's asking black people to kill the black people who kill other black people.

And to that I say........

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

He specifically used the word "enemy." There's no doubt who the 400-year old enemy is. It's a stretch to think that he's talking about black-on-black crime. He's asking why are black people killing each other to the delight of whites. By your logic, he's asking black people to kill the black people who kill other black people.

Why is it a stretch? He said what he said. There are plenty of controversial people and they don't need our help fanning flames.

Making stuff up isn't helping anyone. There are blacks who think all whites are up to no good just there are whites who think that all blacks aren't worth a darn. I would like for those two groups to go find some land to do battle on and get out of the way of the rest of us productive people who know that good and bad people can come from any race.

Of course you can show me the quote where he said "kill all whites" then we don't have to debate this issue.

After all, if that was his message, why did he make statements on two different groups of people?

 

[UgaTom]

Why is it a stretch? He said what he said. There are plenty of controversial people and they don't need our help fanning flames.

Making stuff up isn't helping anyone. There are blacks who think all whites are up to no good just there are whites who think that all blacks aren't worth a darn. I would like for those two groups to go find some land to do battle on and get out of the way of the rest of us productive people who know that good and bad people can come from any race.

Of course you can show me the quote where he said "kill all whites" then we don't have to debate this issue.

After all, if that was his message, why did he make statements on two different groups of people?

He didn't need to come right out and say "kill all whites." It should be obvious what he meant. If he were talking about blacks who kill other blacks, it would make no sense to say, "we must rise up and kill those who kill us." He's a member of NOI which considers whites to be a race of devils. He is one of the ones you mentioned who think that all whites are up to no good.

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

He didn't need to come right out and say "kill all whites." It should be obvious what he meant. If he were talking about blacks who kill other blacks, it would make no sense to say, "we must rise up and kill those who kill us." He's a member of NOI which considers whites to be a race of devils. He is one of the ones you mentioned who think that all whites are up to no good.

So are YOU telling me that whites are the ones primarily killing blacks?

I thought the facts said black-on-black crime leads to more black deaths than from another race. His direct quote sounds like he has these same facts but he does go beyond suggesting that it's much to the delight of the 400 year old enemy (racist whites in power from his perspective). The only implication is that the enemy doesn't have to lift a finger because blacks are doing the job for them.

If you'd stop trying to create your own villain and simply take things at face value you'd be better off.

You seem like the type of person who didn't believe that steroids were being abused by baseball players because Canseco made the first public statement. Statements of fact as well as valid opinions can come from people we don't find to be of agreeable morals.

Keep speculating and fanning flames if that makes you feel better though.

Racists like Dylann Roof are bad including people from any race. Blacks who kill blacks are bad but anyone who murders is also bad.

You're obviously at the point where mention of Farrakhan and enemies automatically means whites in general regardless of what is actually being said. Or perhaps you identify with the enemy he describes which is why you're taking it so personally and why others do not.

 

[UgaTom]

So are YOU telling me that whites are the ones primarily killing blacks?

I thought the facts said black-on-black crime leads to more black deaths than from another race. His direct quote sounds like he has these same facts but he does go beyond suggesting that it's much to the delight of the 400 year old enemy (racist whites in power from his perspective). The only implication is that the enemy doesn't have to lift a finger because blacks are doing the job for them.

If you'd stop trying to create your own villain and simply take things at face value you'd be better off.

You seem like the type of person who didn't believe that steroids were being abused by baseball players because Canseco made the first public statement. Statements of fact as well as valid opinions can come from people we don't find to be of agreeable morals.

Keep speculating and fanning flames if that makes you feel better though.

Racists like Dylann Roof are bad including people from any race. Blacks who kill blacks are bad but anyone who murders is also bad.

You're obviously at the point where mention of Farrakhan and enemies automatically means whites in general regardless of what is actually being said. Or perhaps you identify with the enemy he describes which is why you're taking it so personally and why others do not.

Do you really not get that Farrakhan is no different from the other black race-baiters who ignore black-on-black killings but who try to make federal cases out of every killing of a black by a white? He clearly states who the enemy is. Again, what sense would it make to call for an end to violence against blacks by perpetrating more violence against blacks? That would just be giving the enemy what he wants. If that were his purpose, he would have simply called for an end to the violence.

 

[Thenumber34]

What's even more pathetic than Farrakhan are the idiots in that church who were applauding him......bunch of mindless sheep.

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

Do you really not get that Farrakhan is no different from the other black race-baiters who ignore black-on-black killings but who try to make federal cases out of every killing of a black by a white? He clearly states who the enemy is. Again, what sense would it make to call for an end to violence against blacks by perpetrating more violence against blacks? That would just be giving the enemy what he wants. If that were his purpose, he would have simply called for an end to the violence.

What sense does it make to call for an end to any conflict with war?

Well, I don't see him front and center with Jesse and Al on every racial issue so I guess he is different. I don't recall cases of him cashing in on victims or businesses on these issues like Jesse and Al either.

That said, I don't agree with his politics in general but he does have a track record for at least addressing the root causes of the problems he identifies instead if with blanket statements of victimhood like Jesse and Al.

He's for the empowerment of blacks which everyone should be for if we're going to be serious about breaking the culture of victimhood and government dependence by those who haven't worked their way out like the many middle and upper class blacks have done.

It's the rhetoric of how to go about it along with his religious politics that make him unpopular while clouding any validity he may have on a specific issue.

 

[UgaTom]

What sense does it make to call for an end to any conflict with war?

Well, I don't see him front and center with Jesse and Al on every racial issue so I guess he is different. I don't recall cases of him cashing in on victims or businesses on these issues like Jesse and Al either.

That said, I don't agree with his politics in general but he does have a track record for at least addressing the root causes of the problems he identifies instead if with blanket statements of victimhood like Jesse and Al.

He's for the empowerment of blacks which everyone should be for if we're going to be serious about breaking the culture of victimhood and government dependence by those who haven't worked their way out like the many middle and upper class blacks have done.

It's the rhetoric of how to go about it along with his religious politics that make him unpopular while clouding any validity he may have on a specific issue.

Why would he have to cash in to be in the same league as Al & Jesse? He simply has different motivations.

If you want to delude yourself about what Farrakahn is talking about, don't bother actually doing any searches to read some of his other comments. You might find things like the following which give his recent comment some context:

Farrakhan stated in his speech — given at Morgan State University, a black college located in Baltimore, Md. — that violence was justified in response to the decision not to indict officer Darren Wilson and peaceful protests are only in the interest of “white folks.”


“We going to die anyway. Let’s die for something,” the radical figure told the crowd to roaring applause.


He even said the parents of teenagers should teach their kids how to throw Molotov cocktails. “Teach your baby how to throw the bottle if they can. Fight,” the minister advised, and then imitated throwing the explosive device.


Farrakhan argued that violence was justified by the “law of retaliation” he claims is in both the Bible and the Koran.


“In this book, there’s a law for retaliation,” he said, while holding up what appeared to be the NOI version of the Koran, and repeated, “A law for retaliation.”


Farrakhan believes white people will only start listening to black concerns through violence against whites.


“As long as they kill us and go to Wendy’s and have a burger and go to sleep, they’ll keep killing us,” the self-proclaimed minister said. “But when we die and they die, then soon we’re going to sit at a table and talk about it! We’re tired! We want some of this earth or we’ll tear this goddamn country up!”

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

Why would he have to cash in to be in the same league as Al & Jesse? He simply has different motivations.

If you want to delude yourself about what Farrakahn is talking about, don't bother actually doing any searches to read some of his other comments. You might find things like the following which give his recent comment some context:

Farrakhan stated in his speech — given at Morgan State University, a black college located in Baltimore, Md. — that violence was justified in response to the decision not to indict officer Darren Wilson and peaceful protests are only in the interest of “white folks.”


“We going to die anyway. Let’s die for something,” the radical figure told the crowd to roaring applause.


He even said the parents of teenagers should teach their kids how to throw Molotov cocktails. “Teach your baby how to throw the bottle if they can. Fight,” the minister advised, and then imitated throwing the explosive device.


Farrakhan argued that violence was justified by the “law of retaliation” he claims is in both the Bible and the Koran.


“In this book, there’s a law for retaliation,” he said, while holding up what appeared to be the NOI version of the Koran, and repeated, “A law for retaliation.”


Farrakhan believes white people will only start listening to black concerns through violence against whites.


“As long as they kill us and go to Wendy’s and have a burger and go to sleep, they’ll keep killing us,” the self-proclaimed minister said. “But when we die and they die, then soon we’re going to sit at a table and talk about it! We’re tired! We want some of this earth or we’ll tear this goddamn country up!”

Yeah, I've seen comments like those from him which is why I don't agree with his politics in general. Now you can go read my earlier posts because I have already discussed this with you.

This is about the original claim that he called for volunteers to go stalk and kill whites in general. I still haven't seen that quote.

Keep getting worked up though.

 

[UgaTom]

Yeah, I've seen comments like those from him which is why I don't agree with his politics in general. Now you can go read my earlier posts because I have already discussed this with you.

This is about the original claim that he called for volunteers to go stalk and kill whites in general. I still haven't seen that quote.

Keep getting worked up though.

I'm not worked up at all. I'm just not so obtuse that I can't figure out what he was really saying. He didn't clearly state whom he wanted his 10,000 volunteers to kill. He just said, "those who kill us." It shouldn't be hard to figure out, from what he inferred in those comments and from his previous comments, that he's not talking about other blacks. Who do you think created the tyranny to which he refers? Tyranny goes way beyond black-on-black killings.

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

Okay so let's take his line of thinking and apply it to terrorists. Our nation's policy is to kill the terrorists and their supporters, not all Muslims the way many ignorant individuals want to do.

It is possible to identify specific causes of a problem without holding an entire group accountable based on a commonality not involving the detestable act itself.

He clearly states to "kill those who kill us". Do all whites kill blacks? Where do you get that from?

When he states that a target includes "those of us who kill each other", who do you think "us" is? Is he white now? I just don't see how you miss that he is self-identifying with "us" and "each other".

 

[UgaTom]

Okay so let's take his line of thinking and apply it to terrorists. Our nation's policy is to kill the terrorists and their supporters, not all Muslims the way many ignorant individuals want to do.

It is possible to identify specific causes of a problem without holding an entire group accountable based on a commonality not involving the detestable act itself.

He clearly states to "kill those who kill us". Do all whites kill blacks? Where do you get that from?

Do you really think he meant "those who kill us literally? Seriously?

When he states that a target includes "those of us who kill each other", who do you think "us" is? Is he white now? I just don't see how you miss that he is self-identifying with "us" and "each other".

He had already established who the targets are before he got to that point. He couldn't be more obvious unless he came out and said, "kill white people," which he knows he doesn't have to do for his target audience. "Death is sweeter than continuing to live and bury our children while the white folks give our killers hamburgers." That is clearly a reference to the kid who shot up the black church. The reference to "those of us who kill each other" is followed immediately by, "to the joy of a 400-year-old enemy," which is clearly a reference to whites. He's saying that blacks shouldn't be killing each other when blacks aren't the ones who have created the problems for the black man. Whites are. They are the race of devils. They are the ones who create the tyranny under which they live. He's talking about all blacks, not just the ones who live in neighborhoods ravaged by black-on-black violence.

 

[StoneColdKillerDawg]

What's even more pathetic than Farrakhan are the idiots in that church who were applauding him......bunch of mindless sheep.

I wonder if they took a roll call...sure would be nice to have a list of names...

 

[Dawg 'n IT]

Do you really think he meant "those who kill us literally? Seriously?


He had already established who the targets are before he got to that point. He couldn't be more obvious unless he came out and said, "kill white people," which he knows he doesn't have to do for his target audience. "Death is sweeter than continuing to live and bury our children while the white folks give our killers hamburgers." That is clearly a reference to the kid who shot up the black church. The reference to "those of us who kill each other" is followed immediately by, "to the joy of a 400-year-old enemy," which is clearly a reference to whites. He's saying that blacks shouldn't be killing each other when blacks aren't the ones who have created the problems for the black man. Whites are. They are the race of devils. They are the ones who create the tyranny under which they live. He's talking about all blacks, not just the ones who live in neighborhoods ravaged by black-on-black violence.

We're on the same page with the Roof reference so if he meant all whites why did he differentiate between Roof and the police in general?

As for the 2nd target, you just admitted that he was talking about blacks killing blacks then you started parsing other statements together. You are correct, he doesn't think blacks should be killing each other. His audience is black. But we can all extend that thinking to whites shouldn't kill each other either and no one should murder period.

You can be afraid all you want but let's not act like this man is in control of blacks. Let's also not forget that most people have no interest in mass murder of other races even if they are bigots and/or racists. If people were interested in that kind of thing, none of us would be here today.

I've learned that the majority of people love talking junk as well as belonging to a cause. Thus, people love making mountains out of mole hills.

I just want to continue enjoying life and UGA football games without people always on edge about the race war stirring things up.

Roof walked the walk but did that result in a bunch of racist whites jumping on the bandwagon to further the cause? No.

Did it result in rioting blacks purging white communities and racist blacks retaliating to further a war? No.

Most people don't want it including all of the other races stuck in the middle.

While we're on the subject of racism and leaders, can we please stop with the talking point that Obama has set race relations back 50 years? Last I checked, society is still integrated and I still see blacks and whites relatively getting along in the real world just like under Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan.

I still see different races working together at work, playinf together in sports, dining together, etc. Whether Obama is the worst president ever or not, how can his actions represent an entire race but no other president in history represents his race? Isn't that a bigoted perspective in the first place? The only people who believe relations are bad are those who choose to live with that mentality because nothing new is forcing any individual to not respect an entire race.

Stop giving these leaders more power than they really have and stop eating up the media's race baiting which is attempting to weaken the public for the real threat looming.

No one can take this country until we are disarmed and divided. If you're concerned about anything else then you need to open your eyes to what's really going on. When the real hammer drops, race is going to be the least of anyone's concerns.

 

[UgaTom]

We're on the same page with the Roof reference so if he meant all whites why did he differentiate between Roof and the police in general?

He is not speaking literally. He lumps all whites together. They are all guilty, whether it's killing blacks or perpetuating the tyranny under which he believes they they live.

As for the 2nd target, you just admitted that he was talking about blacks killing blacks then you started parsing other statements together. You are correct, he doesn't think blacks should be killing each other. His audience is black. But we can all extend that thinking to whites shouldn't kill each other either and no one should murder period.

I didn't have to admit anything. He clearly mentions black-on-black killing. Rational people would agree that people shouldn't kill each other, but clearly he's not rational.

You can be afraid all you want but let's not act like this man is in control of blacks. Let's also not forget that most people have no interest in mass murder of other races even if they are bigots and/or racists. If people were interested in that kind of thing, none of us would be here today.

Where the hell do you get this from? I'm not afraid of what he said. I ignored the post about his comment when it was first made because I'm sure most black people are rational enough to take what he said at face value. That's no reason to try to deny what he's actually saying. There's a huge difference between what he says and what people like Al & Jesse say.

I've learned that the majority of people love talking junk as well as belonging to a cause. Thus, people love making mountains out of mole hills.

I just want to continue enjoying life and UGA football games without people always on edge about the race war stirring things up.

Roof walked the walk but did that result in a bunch of racist whites jumping on the bandwagon to further the cause? No.

Did it result in rioting blacks purging white communities and racist blacks retaliating to further a war? No.

Most people don't want it including all of the other races stuck in the middle.

While we're on the subject of racism and leaders, can we please stop with the talking point that Obama has set race relations back 50 years? Last I checked, society is still integrated and I still see blacks and whites relatively getting along in the real world just like under Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan.

I still see different races working together at work, playinf together in sports, dining together, etc. Whether Obama is the worst president ever or not, how can his actions represent an entire race but no other president in history represents his race? Isn't that a bigoted perspective in the first place? The only people who believe relations are bad are those who choose to live with that mentality because nothing new is forcing any individual to not respect an entire race.

Stop giving these leaders more power than they really have and stop eating up the media's race baiting which is attempting to weaken the public for the real threat looming.

No one can take this country until we are disarmed and divided. If you're concerned about anything else then you need to open your eyes to what's really going on. When the real hammer drops, race is going to be the least of anyone's concerns.

You're really all over the place. You don't think white presidents represent their race? You think when Kanye West said that W didn't like black people that he was just describing one person and not lumping him in with other experiences he might have had or heard about? Race relations in this country are very complex. I don't pretend to understand how it works. If you've got it all figured out from anecdotal evidence, good for you.

 

[FeralDawg]

Jack Cashill, a WND contributor and author of the new book "Scarlet Letters: The Ever-increasing Intolerance of the Cult of Liberalism Exposed," said the presidency of Barack Obama has resuscitated and breathed new life into Farrakhan's ministry, encouraging him to spew ever-more outrageous racial invective.

"The Obama presidency has given the 82-year-old Farrakhan new life," Cashill told WND. "By racializing just about everything he has touched, Obama has raised black paranoia to new heights, and Farrakhan is exploiting that paranoia with potentially lethal consequences."
Peterson said Farrakhan is a longtime demagogue looking to tap into black angst and spark a "race war."

"Farrakhan claims blacks are suffering under the 'tyranny' of whites, but the only tyranny that's controlling black Americans today is their own anger and hatred toward whites," Peterson said.

Peterson said Farrakhan is deceiving blacks and he's "leading them to the slaughter."

"Farrakhan is a racist. He has referred to whites as blue-eyed devils. He's taking advantage of the anger that exists in the black community for his own personal gain.

"This man is a domestic terrorist and he needs to be arrested immediately for making terrorist threats. This is against the law," he continued. "No white person could incite and encourage violence toward blacks and get away with it. They would be locked up and shunned. What Farrakhan is doing is evil and it’s not good for America. Whites are not causing the suffering and misery that exists in the major urban areas. The breakdown of the black family, dependency on the government, and lack of moral character are the real issues hurting blacks."

Christians applaud Islamic preacher of war

The fact that Farrakhan made his remarks at a black church is even more troubling to Peterson, himself an ordained minister.

"That indicates that these men and women agree with his hate speech. There is no way you can believe in God and applaud and cheer for a demagogue," he said. "There's no way you can be a Christian and listen to someone who encourages you to hate your fellow man. That is not showing love. The people listening to Farrakhan need to repent. These people are encouraging the next generation to hate whites. At this rate, this race issue will never end."

Preaching directly from the Quran before a packed Baptist church, the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan told his adoring audience that violent retaliation is the only way for American blacks to “rise up” and overthrow their white oppressors.

Conservative black leaders told WND Wednesday they believe Farrakhan’s statements went beyond the limits of free speech into the realm of criminal incitement, although a noted constitutional attorney cautioned that prosecuting on these terms would be an uphill battle.

 

[Grumpyolddawg]

I removed this thread since a couple of hijackers want to deny there is evil in the world and cast aspersions upon those who report the vulgarity such as espousing murder, encouraging the less stable among us to become murderers as LF so openly did. BTW to the deniers whose only defense to evil is cry for a LINK! Try your google option and punch in the title line to this post and see the tons of reports of this incident. I used their exact verbage. The truly disturbing thing is LF has obviously found that most people, black and white just want to get along so he has given up on creating a massive up rising and race war and goes for the extreme, hoping to find 10,000. One of the relatives of the Charleston 9 are worth 1 million Farrakhans.

The thing I don't understand about slavery is why are whites being solely blamed for selling blacks into slavery. It wasn't slave traders who defeated their ancestors and brought them to the coast and sold them into slavery, it was other tribes who conqured a tribe and took the surviors to the coast and waited for a slave trader to show up. Where is the outrage at the conqurering tribes? If their tribe had won they would be the ones selling the losing tribe. Slave traders didn't beat the bushes hunting blacks to put into slavery, other tribes did. I think slavery is wrong on every level, but if not for the slave traders they would have been killed by the victors.

 

[HeulenHund2]

Farrakhan is a big mouth idiot. I haven't seen a video of him saying this and it's not being reported by any real news site.
There are fools on both ends of the wing nut spectrum. I do know many things posted here are false.

 

[FeralDawg]

This brings me hope more than anything that he is perceived as such:
Conservative black leaders told WND Wednesday they believe Farrakhan’s statements went beyond the limits of free speech into the realm of criminal incitement.

 

[oletex]

Farrakhan is a big mouth idiot. I haven't seen a video of him saying this and it's not being reported by any real news site.
There are fools on both ends of the wing nut spectrum. I do know many things posted here are false.

 

[oletex]

That's because you don't want to find it helen. I happened upon the video and text via a msg on my email. I haven't thought about this crackpot in a while so I clicked and there it is along with an assortment of other rants. All threatening, from tearing this God Damn country apart to calling for the 10,000 killers to rise up and stalk those whose tryanny has kept us down for 400 years, the blue eyed devils. But what else is new, even BO sat with his children and family in front of Rev Wright, who is LF lite, and listened to the same hate filled rhetoric for years. I'm sure he has raised his to be responsible and love life instead of listening to hate. But that has been part of the black experience in this country a long time. And in some cases it is hard to overcome. It's hard for people to overcome what has been preached to them since they were small. Which makes it difficult for them to rationalize when police 99% of the time are just doing what they are ordered to do. Hell I've been angry at the police for my treatment but give me a break.

Hatred in one form or another has been jammed down the throats of black children for years and years so it shouldn't be a surprise that some never get past it. That's makes the Charleston 9 even more remarkable in that they invited the crazed young man into their church. That makes the tons of black faces who greet me in my coffee shop every morning with a good morning even more remarkable and I greet right back cheerily. Tht's my contribution to making peace with my fellow man. But LF doesn't want peace, he wants war. And even if you aren't interested in war, war is interested in you. In any event people are sick of the violence and violent talk and the media stirring people up and people like LF profiting off of it.