I understand this is an ongoing congressional review but I assume the data gathering should be confidential to the public until a report is released. So I am to assume this is another example of Adam Schi$$ releasing confidential information to smear folks. For the record, not a good look for Mrs Thomas nor a good look for this committee. In January of 2023 I suspect payback is coming , right or wrong. There future leader of the House will have axes to grind and grind he do….
Ginni Thomas
- Thread starter willdup
- Start date
In a related note, I know people on here love to hate Adam Schiff, but this should be legislation that all of us across the political spectrum could get behind. It's going to require an absolute groundswell of public support, so call your representatives early and often!
Last edited:
If you think by Joe saying he was going to appoint the first black woman to the Supreme Court was a racist comment, you clearly don’t understand racism. A racist comment would have been more like “We will no longer allow white men to serve on the Supreme Court.” Now blacks have been told things like this in America. Now it’s 2022, and a black woman is finally appointed to the top bench in the country, and people want to cry about racist politics? Like I said you don’t understand racism.
And tokenism has always been a thing for the right. People on the left have always worked hard and fought to bring down barriers in this country instead of being a yes man/woman to master. With all these people running around and screaming “MAGA”, I want you to really consider who’s the pawn?
Calling KBJ “pedo defending” is mischaracterizing her record and words to the extreme and I would hope you know that.
Regarding Ginni and her husband, the facts that have already been established should be enough, and if the political affiliations were reversed, republicans would be marching on the Capitol (again) demanding action. The actions themselves are embarrassing and unethical, but in my mind the silence from the rest of the GOP is even more problematic. Supreme Court justices should be he above reproach and the lack of recusal and lone dissent on the Trump case alone should have Clarence stepping down. We are talking about efforts to overthrow our government!
And your opinion about Hunter and the big guy keeping their family business separate ?
I said it will be another nothing burger. Just another stab in the dark by butt hurt dims trying to persuade folks to vote for their evil anti American party because of some made up issue about the integrity of others. It's the only way they can win. Smart Americans will not vote for the socialist anti America, economy killing polices of you leftist.
Here you go again using dim propaganda for your sources. fact check . org LMBO... Pelosi is guilty and a reprobate. She has done nothing for anyone but her and her cronies. Check out her stock dealings. You guys are disgusting with your use of propaganda.Entirely debunked. In fact, any discussion of why the National Guard weren't deployed to the Capitol sooner is highly damning for Trump and team.
Are you suggesting that the dems orchestrated J6 as a false flag operation? If so, you and Ginni Thomas would get along well.
Pelosi did not block the National Guard from the Capitol on Jan. 6
On Tuesday, a false claim about the deadly Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol resurfaced suggesting that Pelosi blocked the National Guard from coming to lawmakers’ defense during the insurrection at the Capitol.apnews.com
Republicans' Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6 - FactCheck.org
House Republicans have sought to change the narrative on the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by pro-Trump protesters, claiming that Speaker Nancy Pelosi is "ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security at the Capitol." But their arguments overstate the role of the House speaker in...www.factcheck.org
Pelosi: It was ‘inexplicable’ why it took so long for National Guard to be activated on Jan. 6
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said on Thursday it was “inexplicable” why it took the National Guard so long to be activated during the insurrection at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.Pelosi — w…thehill.com
here why don't you read something not put out by the dim spin propaganda site for once. IF you cared about truth I wouldn't have to provide you with info. You would look for yourself. You are just to much leftist to really want to know the truth.Entirely debunked. In fact, any discussion of why the National Guard weren't deployed to the Capitol sooner is highly damning for Trump and team.
Are you suggesting that the dems orchestrated J6 as a false flag operation? If so, you and Ginni Thomas would get along well.
Pelosi did not block the National Guard from the Capitol on Jan. 6
On Tuesday, a false claim about the deadly Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol resurfaced suggesting that Pelosi blocked the National Guard from coming to lawmakers’ defense during the insurrection at the Capitol.
Republicans' Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6 - FactCheck.org
House Republicans have sought to change the narrative on the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by pro-Trump protesters, claiming that Speaker Nancy Pelosi is "ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security at the Capitol." But their arguments overstate the role of the House speaker in...
Pelosi: It was ‘inexplicable’ why it took so long for National Guard to be activated on Jan. 6
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said on Thursday it was “inexplicable” why it took the National Guard so long to be activated during the insurrection at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.Pelosi — w…
Did Pelosi Reject Security Help at the Capitol on Jan. 6th? - Headline USA
Since the Democrat impeachment team backed away from questions and calling witnesses during the Senate trial, Republican committee leaders on Monday inquired with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., about the failure to protect the Capitol against trespassers on Jan. 6. “The Speaker is...
headlineusa.com
I generally link to well known mainstream media sources and you link to obscure far right sites that have a proven record of bias and unsupported assertions.here why don't you read something not put out by the dim spin propaganda site for once. IF you cared about truth I wouldn't have to provide you with info. You would look for yourself. You are just to much leftist to really want to know the truth.
Did Pelosi Reject Security Help at the Capitol on Jan. 6th? - Headline USA
Since the Democrat impeachment team backed away from questions and calling witnesses during the Senate trial, Republican committee leaders on Monday inquired with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., about the failure to protect the Capitol against trespassers on Jan. 6. “The Speaker is...
No one has suggested Ginni's batshit crazy and seditious texts aren't real, we know Thomas didn't recuse himself in a case that absolutely involved his wife and would lead to damning evidence surfacing and he was the only justice who ruled in Trump's favor. It doesn't matter who is reporting those facts, those are the facts.
If you think that this is a nothingburger than you are confirming you are a hypocritical partisan hack, not that we needed this post to show that.
Your insults and anger routine is tiresome and consistently adds nothin to the discussion. I'll save us both time and avoid commenting on your posts.
Last edited:
You guys act like Jesus himself came down and shit the Constitution out his ass. It was written by a bunch of rich dudes who didn't want to be ruled by a bunch of other rich dudes in a far off land who and the over taxation due to having to pay bills for the 7-Years War. They wanted to be free but they didn't want to give away too much power to the people of their new country so that's where the Electoral College comes in. Its a horrible and overly complex system that forces a two party system because anymore and there's no way a party can hope to garner the necessary EC Points to claim the WH. You want to get rid of the two party system you have to get rid of the EC.
C'mon man. You are one of the libs that does more than spout talking points and you know nobody confuses the founders with a group of gods.
They gave us a document that outlined our basic rights and also limited the powers of the fed gov. They also realized societies change and gave us a way to alter the governing document. Imo thats pretty special and worthy of protecting.
If you don't like a constitutionally required function, work to change it but realize things like the electoral college exist because the smaller states didnt want to be ruled by huge cities. I think that applies today.
Exactly. If we bent to Atlanta’s rule completely we would be a bankrupt state. There are cities in and around Atlanta trying to break free. I see his point a little bit. But the bigger picture is a much bigger deal. Just like you said.
I get your point, and I agree that the structure of a bicameral legislation and electoral college was a smart way to create some balance amongst states that were significantly diverse economically and thus socially. Of course they had to balance the interests of the slave states versus the non-slave states, but they only kicked the can down the road eighty years or so on that issue, which several of the founding fathers were concerned about at the time.
My biggest issue today is the utter lack of balance in the senate. The fifty Republican senators represent 43.5% of the population, which is a massive disparity particularly given the current political polarization of our country. Three of the seven justices on the SCOTUS were nominated by a president who lost the popular vote and were confirmed by a senate that represents an even smaller minority of our populace.
Take the above and add that conservatives like Ginni Thomas, Mark Meadows and many others who are being outed for demonstrating commitment to theocratic minority rule by overturning an election and the stakes are higher than ever. Conservatives know full well that demographics are moving against them and some have made clear they feel righteously justified to do what ever it takes to keep power away from what they see as the godless majority.
They feel God is on their side, and we know that this belief can be used to justify nearly anything, regardless of the constitution or our democracy.
Last edited:
Can you point out in the US Constitution or any state Constitution where only 2 parties are allowed?
Getting rid of the EC doesn't solve the problem of our 2 party system. If you believe it would, please explain.
We can already vote for candidates of other parties and independents.
You must first define the problem before offering a solution. Blaming the EC for our 2 party dominance is misplaced. We've had 8* (National Union was a temporary rebranding of the Republican party during the Civil War) different affiliations including unaffiliated out of 46 presidents. The 2 party system took hold with Pierce as the Whigs faded.
But you missed the point on the founding of our country. The Founding Fathers intent was to disrupt absolute power wherever possible. The EC was specifically created to avoid simple majority rule at the federal level.
You claim that Republican Senate representing 43.5% is a massive disparity, why? The Senate was purposely created with balance while the House was purposely created to give more populous states more representation. The goal wasn't to give a party a hand up.
There are checks and balances throughout our system on purpose. It's supposed to be difficult for any single faction to dominate politically.
The current political attitude is that a party gets a president elected then Congress rubber stamps whatever the president, ergo the party wants. That is literally what the Constitution tries to avoid hence why the powers of the presidency are constitutionally way more limited than what people think. Congress simply isn't doing its job and instead enables power to party.
Term limits would be a great start on making changes.
Can you point to when the country legit had more than two parties? It's all about math. To get to 270 it's nearly impossible for a candidate to do that with a party umbrella to coalesce the required EC points.
You look at what Washington said about political parties and his warning against them and you can easily draw the conclusion that the two-party system we see now is something the founding fathers would want for this country.
Pelosi Congress Claims Sovereign Immunity in Federal Court to Keep Secret January 6 Videos and Emails - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced that it filed an opposition to the U.S. Capitol Police’s (USCP) effort to shut down Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuit for January 6 videos and emails. Through its police department, Congress argues that the videos and emails are not public records...
www.judicialwatch.org
Already did. Obviously you don't care to read. Don't take my word for it though, research for yourself.
Wait didn't you say political factions or parties aren't mentioned in the Constitution?
So instead of a simple majority rule the EC allows for minorty rule which is not what the founding fathers wanted.
Oh my bad sorry you're right almost 200 years ago was the last time we could argue we had legit more than two parties. America going almost 200 years without a third party is ****ing shit.
Not so sure demographics are working against conservatives thanks to Biden and the likes of AOC. Would have agreed with you a year ago. Time will tell.
i would love to see this party system broken up. My fear is that human nature being what it is, they would just form again in a different fashion. But at least we would have a brief amount of time to see some 3rd party types have a chance
No, you still have trouble with reading comprehension.
You calling someone a hypocrite and a partisan hack is one of the funniest things ever posted on the chats. You are nothing more than a mouthpiece for the most ideological far left loon department of the dim witted party. You post from nothing but the most left leaning fact checkers and dim propaganda sites. You should compare what you post to actual events sometimes and see if being right one time made you feel better. I hope you don’t comment on my post anymore, in fact,, I hope you stop posting all your disinformation and leftist propaganda. Your right, I hate to see what people like you foster upon the good people of America. Baby killing, perverted sex on children, crime, drugs, and every anti America open border,, high tax high inflation weaken America policy of your beloved senile coot in the White House.
Not even close to the same thing.
So no, you are doing this wrong.
Well, Jared and his wife made $640m over the four years they were employed by the taxpayer. That’s totally normal.
Kushner, Ivanka Trump reported up to $640M in outside income during White House years
Former White House advisors Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner made as much as $640 million during their time in the Trump administration, according to an analysis by a government watchdog group.The Ci…
thehill.com
Jared couldn’t even get security clearance without his father in law’s override yet somehow was made responsible for the Middle East despite zero experience. Also totally normal.
Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled
Jared Kushner was rejected for a top-secret clearance by two career security specialists, but their supervisor overruled them and approved him, sources say.
666 Fifth Avenue, one of the worst commercial real estate deals in the history of Manhattan, was bailed out in a highly unusual deal with the Qataris.
Timeline on Jared Kushner, Qatar, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House Policy
A comprehensive account of Jared Kushner, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House support for the blockade of Qatar after the Qataris rejected Kushner Companies.
www.justsecurity.org
And Jared just closed on a new $3b investment fund, funded primarily with money from the Middle East.
So yes, Hunter Biden, who has never been a federal employee, is a two bit piker compared to the eqsuisite scam the Kushners have been running.
But I’ll note this thread is about Ginni and Clarence Thomas. I don’t blame anyone for trying to change the subject, as no reasonable person can defend the actions of either.
Hmmm thought you only used msm sources. Lol. You can’t even keep up with which propaganda sites you use. Even if they get some parts of the story right they are going to spin to the far left so that will suit you leftist just fine.Well, Jared and his wife made $640m over the four years they were employed by the taxpayer. That’s totally normal.
Kushner, Ivanka Trump reported up to $640M in outside income during White House years
Former White House advisors Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner made as much as $640 million during their time in the Trump administration, according to an analysis by a government watchdog group.The Ci…
Jared couldn’t even get security clearance without his father in law’s override yet somehow was made responsible for the Middle East despite zero experience. Also totally normal.
Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled
Jared Kushner was rejected for a top-secret clearance by two career security specialists, but their supervisor overruled them and approved him, sources say.www.nbcnews.com
666 Fifth Avenue, one of the worst commercial real estate deals in the history of Manhattan, was bailed out in a highly unusual deal with the Qataris.
Timeline on Jared Kushner, Qatar, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House Policy
A comprehensive account of Jared Kushner, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House support for the blockade of Qatar after the Qataris rejected Kushner Companies.
And Jared just closed on a new $3b investment fund, funded primarily with money from the Middle East.
So yes, Hunter Biden, who has never been a federal employee, is a two bit piker compared to the eqsuisite scam the Kushners have been running.
But I’ll note this thread is about Ginni and Clarence Thomas. I don’t blame anyone for trying to change the subject, as no reasonable person can defend the actions of either.
Your and the media’s total hypocrisy is on full display yet again. Total interest in Ginni. ZERO interest in Hunter and the Biden crime family. Totally covered it up so as to not hurt Biden’s chances to steal the election.Well, Jared and his wife made $640m over the four years they were employed by the taxpayer. That’s totally normal.
Kushner, Ivanka Trump reported up to $640M in outside income during White House years
Former White House advisors Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner made as much as $640 million during their time in the Trump administration, according to an analysis by a government watchdog group.The Ci…
Jared couldn’t even get security clearance without his father in law’s override yet somehow was made responsible for the Middle East despite zero experience. Also totally normal.
Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled
Jared Kushner was rejected for a top-secret clearance by two career security specialists, but their supervisor overruled them and approved him, sources say.
666 Fifth Avenue, one of the worst commercial real estate deals in the history of Manhattan, was bailed out in a highly unusual deal with the Qataris.
Timeline on Jared Kushner, Qatar, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House Policy
A comprehensive account of Jared Kushner, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House support for the blockade of Qatar after the Qataris rejected Kushner Companies.
And Jared just closed on a new $3b investment fund, funded primarily with money from the Middle East.
So yes, Hunter Biden, who has never been a federal employee, is a two bit piker compared to the eqsuisite scam the Kushners have been running.
But I’ll note this thread is about Ginni and Clarence Thomas. I don’t blame anyone for trying to change the subject, as no reasonable person can defend the actions of either.
Total BS.
Ginni wanted Meadows to look into some of the questions that were being raised about the election, according to the alleged texts. She didn’t encourage him to do anything illegal, and she was nowhere near the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2020.
This seems like a bunch of racist,misogynistic leftists trying to take down a white woman and black man to benefit their communist party
PS I don't typically call people racist and misogynistic but on here one must retort in kind as the senile one said recently about chemical weapons.
Well, Jared and his wife made $640m over the four years they were employed by the taxpayer. That’s totally normal.
Kushner, Ivanka Trump reported up to $640M in outside income during White House years
Former White House advisors Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner made as much as $640 million during their time in the Trump administration, according to an analysis by a government watchdog group.The Ci…
Jared couldn’t even get security clearance without his father in law’s override yet somehow was made responsible for the Middle East despite zero experience. Also totally normal.
Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled
Jared Kushner was rejected for a top-secret clearance by two career security specialists, but their supervisor overruled them and approved him, sources say.
Jared
666 Fifth Avenue, one of the worst commercial real estate deals in the history of Manhattan, was bailed out in a highly unusual deal with the Qataris.
Timeline on Jared Kushner, Qatar, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House Policy
A comprehensive account of Jared Kushner, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House support for the blockade of Qatar after the Qataris rejected Kushner Companies.
And Jared just closed on a new $3b investment fund, funded primarily with money from the Middle East.
So yes, Hunter Biden, who has never been a federal employee, is a two bit piker compared to the eqsuisite scam the Kushners have been running.
But I’ll note this thread is about Ginni and Clarence Thomas. I don’t blame anyone for trying to change the subject, as no reasonable person can defend the actions of either.
Wild, the Kushners were never employed by the Fed govt and u know that. He is a billionaire international businessman not a clown drug addicted no talent loser like Hunter. As for the security clearance, the reason given for his denial was he was too wealthy and would possibly be a candidate for foreign influence. Nothing political there right??
You should be very appreciative of Jared working for peace in the ME. The Abraham Accords which he concocted was an innovative approach to finding peace in the ME No one thought it could actually be achieved. That is until Biden decided to move forward on the Iran deal which will cause a nuclear arms race in the ME & a nuclear Iran.
Last edited:
Jared and Ivanka were absolutely both employees of the federal government. Neither took a salary but they both were full time employees and Jared, with no experience at all, was given a lot of responsibility.
Again, they made $640m while conducting the official business of the United States and Jared has leveraged the hell out of his relationships in the Middle East. I’m sure his latest investors are just impressed by his investment accuman (see 666 Fifth Ave) and there is nothing untoward going on. I’m sure MBS doesn’t feel he owes Jared a favor for ignoring the literal slaughter of a US resident.
Last edited:
Tell me why Joe opposed the first black woman nominated to a scotus position.
Kind of the genius of the EC, iyam. Founders saw a land that has massive amounts of open space and a handful of large cities that had bigger populations than thousands of square miles. The population argument you made is exactly the reason we need the EC.
we aren’t a democracy by definition nor should we be.
A
anon_03j5dr7l9qs90
Guest
So Biden hasn’t made a big deal over her being not only black but also a female?
