This is something that tends to say explosive plays may be a bigger factor in winning than turnovers. Obviously too many turnovers can outweigh huge plays. And too few big plays can likely outweigh 0 turnovers. But this site does seem to suggest that if things are close, you go with the best playmaker over the best decision maker. Could that be the reason we're having a problem picking a QB at this point? Don't know, but it could be.
If you win the explosiveness battle (using PPP), you win 86 percent of the time.
If you win the efficency battle (using Success Rate), you win 83 percent of the time.
If you win the drive-finishing battle (using points per trip inside the 40), you win 75 percent of the time.
If you win the field position battle (using average starting field position), you win 72 percent of the time.
If you win the turnover battle (using turnover margin), you win 73 percent of the time.
