Nope, I was thinking of the Constitutional Republic of America, as a tribute to our once great nation.Hey, you can call it something cool! Ooh, like the Confederacy...or the Confederacy of Dunces...oops, no, copywrite issues.
Nope, I was thinking of the Constitutional Republic of America, as a tribute to our once great nation.Hey, you can call it something cool! Ooh, like the Confederacy...or the Confederacy of Dunces...oops, no, copywrite issues.
But, but, but, he has degrees in hard sciences, and he wears TEVAS, and he's doing Soylent Green for more balanced energy!! He's very, very, smart.See it's stupid retorts like this that causes ppl to think your not real bright.
But, but, but, he has degrees in hard sciences, and he wears TEVAS, and he's doing Soylent Green for more balanced energy!! He's very, very, smart.
You really are a grumpy guy. Why so mad?But, but, but, he has degrees in hard sciences, and he wears TEVAS, and he's doing Soylent Green for more balanced energy!! He's very, very, smart.
Not mad at all. Thoroughly enjoying making sport of our boy Hydro, but I wish he'd make it more difficult.You really are a grumpy guy. Why so mad?
Perhaps if you (the GOP and its hillbilly cousins the Tea Party) were less exclusionary, racist, and homophobic those labels wouldn't be necessary.
An alternate method is to do a quick read of Huffpo, so that one can remember the daily talking points.When in doubt, repeat the only terms and phrases that one can remember from Subaru bumper sticker school.
M---read your posts and cant make any sense of how you feel about issues. Short anwers/questions lead us to believe that you serve as an antagonist to stir your fellow board members up. You don't contribute any enlightenment to the merits of POTUS , James Taylor, et al. If you believe he is the best President, back it up with facts. Foreign policy ?You really are a grumpy guy. Why so mad?
OH, I'm sorry, I mis-spoke. As of 2014, there were 2,726,000 non-military Federal employees, so I missed it by 250,000. Their average salary was 86,000, which is obviously lower. The difference between the avg wage and my number was benefits paid. The last time I checked, I'm still out of pocket for their benefits. To boot, it does NOT include the accrued pensions, which I'm also on the hook for.MattSinatro said:There is no way 3M at an average of 174K salary per year is FACT. You have to be an absolute clown or watch FoxNews to believe that.
We'll just have to disagree. If you can't prove you're a citizen then you shouldn't be granted the privilege of voting. It's too important, especially considering how easy it is for a citizen to get an ID. Just as easy as voting. If you disagree, fine.I'm not Ag anything.
Don't know though it happened in Texas, NC, Alabama that I remember. NYU at one point estimated 11% of those voter age lacked sufficient ID to do so; haven't seen an update. Too many based on the few cases of actual voter fraud, the point made in the previously cited report.
Odd. Why would I deny it? Something wrong with Ag Engineers?We'll just have to disagree. If you can't prove you're a citizen then you shouldn't be granted the privilege of voting. It's too important, especially considering how easy it is for a citizen to get an ID. Just as easy as voting. If you disagree, fine.
But, I do think you're AgEng.
I have yet to see you elaborate on the issue of requiring an ID to vote. All you do is resort to name calling. You do realize the block of voters that this would supposedly hurt has to have an ID to receive and cash their welfare checks. Or any other government assistance for that matter including EBT. So if they already have an ID, whats the big deal in requiring them to use it to vote. If by some slim chance they don't have one, you do know how simple it is to get one ..right? So...how does it suppress the voter?Voter suppression laws, religious freedom laws, both of which fulfill all criteria.
Some of those it was shown to directly impact had no birth certificate making it an administrative burden as well as a financial burden, a de facto poll tax. Again, it's not about fraud; if it was then the States with the stringent ID laws would apply it to absentee voting as well, where the bulk of the few cases of fraud have occurred. This is about suppressing the vote, pure and simple.I have yet to see you elaborate on the issue of requiring an ID to vote. All you do is resort to name calling. You do realize the block of voters that this would supposedly hurt has to have an ID to receive and cash their welfare checks. Or any other government assistance for that matter including EBT. So if they already have an ID, whats the big deal in requiring them to use it to vote. If by some slim chance they don't have one, you do know how simple it is to get one ..right? So...how does it suppress the voter?
Seriously, see if you can answer the question.
How are those without a birth certificate receiving a check and cashing it? How are they receiving any kind of aide at all without an ID.? Also pretty sure the county you were born in has a copy of birth certificate on hand. The minuscule percentage of the population that this would affect wouldn't make a difference, even if it is true(that they can't get a birth certificate or already have an ID that they refuse to use so that they can vote multiple times for Obama)Some of those it was shown to directly impact had no birth certificate making it an administrative burden as well as a financial burden, a de facto poll tax. Again, it's not about fraud; if it was then the States with the stringent ID laws would apply it to absentee voting as well, where the bulk of the few cases of fraud have occurred. This is about suppressing the vote, pure and simple.
Ever gotten a replacement birth certificate? Costs. We also still have people who never had one. Believe it or not there are people who live off the grid. Your last statement is the usual looney paranoia: the President couldn't have won without the benefit of people voting more than once. Probably other Muslim Socialist Communists!How are those without a birth certificate receiving a check and cashing it? How are they receiving any kind of aide at all without an ID.? Also pretty sure the county you were born in has a copy of birth certificate on hand. The minuscule percentage of the population that this would affect wouldn't make a difference, even if it is true(that they can't get a birth certificate or already have an ID that they refuse to use so that they can vote multiple times for Obama)
I didn't say he wouldn't have won without it. Although there was voter fraud in both of his election years. I am sure you know this, right? A certified copy of a birth certificate cost about $25. But who cares, hell, we give them free housing, food and electricity, whats another 25 bucks gonna hurt. Pretty sure the left isn't going to let that stop them from getting the votes.Ever gotten a replacement birth certificate? Costs. We also still have people who never had one. Believe it or not there are people who live off the grid. Your last statement is the usual looney paranoia: the President couldn't have won without the benefit of people voting more than once. Probably other Muslim Socialist Communists!
Some of those it was shown to directly impact had no birth certificate making it an administrative burden as well as a financial burden, a de facto poll tax. Again, it's not about fraud; if it was then the States with the stringent ID laws would apply it to absentee voting as well, where the bulk of the few cases of fraud have occurred. This is about suppressing the vote, pure and simple.
Ever gotten a replacement birth certificate? Costs. We also still have people who never had one. Believe it or not there are people who live off the grid. Your last statement is the usual looney paranoia: the President couldn't have won without the benefit of people voting more than once. Probably other Muslim Socialist Communists!
best POTUS this country ever had.
Damb.
It's one thing to watch Obama's agenda eat away at our economy with all the fed regs, to watch race relations deteriorate (by design) at warp speed and to see in action, the worst foreign policy since Chamberlin. No one can say they are surprised; this is the result of an undefined Hope and Change from someone strongly influenced by Communism and Columbia (though, that might be one in the same).
Who do we thank for this? Folks like James Taylor. Each time one of these celebs spouts off, I grow further committed to never turn a $ in their direction. What the hell caused them to develop their perspectives like this? Think ole James lives a tough life? Betting not. Yet, he bites the hand that feeds him. If you can't make it in America, regardless of background, you can't make it anywhere. Also heard, as if we need to know, George Clooney's wife bought him a Porsche 911 GT3 for his birthday. Having paid a lot of money to take one around the Atlanta Motorsport's Park for 5 laps, I think that's about the best b'day gift anyone could receive. And that'll be as close to a GT3 that I'll ever get. But, shouldn't these radical leftist be driving a Prius? Isn't THAT what the left expects of us? Yet, see how they live. I'm all for toys like this (employs many people and makes profits) but seems blatantly hypocritical to me, of them.
I pray for leadership.....before it's too late.
James Taylor is a very successful and smart man. I value his opinion.