ADVERTISEMENT

Suck it, McCabe!...

This reminds me of Germany in the 1930's. Eliminate those who oppose you.
Funny, guys like you are still looking for Russians, but seem to miss the actual corruption and collusion of the Democrat party. Obama AKA POSOTUS weaponized the IRS, FBI, and Justice dept to spy and ruin his political enemies.........You guys are exactly what you accuse others of being.
 
This reminds me of Germany in the 1930's. Eliminate those who oppose you.
You must be joking. A guy who might, or might not, be guilty of a number of crimes gets fired and it reminds you of Nazi Germany?

The FBI had already removed him from his job, and, let's not forget, he has plenty of Clinton payola to fund a retirement.
 
Funny, guys like you are still looking for Russians, but seem to miss the actual corruption and collusion of the Democrat party. Obama AKA POSOTUS weaponized the IRS, FBI, and Justice dept to spy and ruin his political enemies.........You guys are exactly what you accuse others of being.
Funny, guys like you think that Trump has done nothing wrong, and continue to blame every admistration prior to this cluster f"ck thats in office now.
 
Flynn was ruined over a process crime.....when the people who are supposed to enforce and uphold the law use cheese dick tactic to enhance their resume ......we get what we've got. A political and corrupt Justice department and FBI

Based on this response, I can only think you don’t know what Flynn did and what he lied about. It’s pretty cut and dry if you know what he pleaded guilty to doing.
 
Funny, guys like you think that Trump has done nothing wrong, and continue to blame every admistration prior to this cluster f"ck thats in office now.

Well unlike Trump and the Russians......There's a shit ton of evidence that Obama AKA POSOTUS did exactly that
 
  • Like
Reactions: benchwarmerdawg
  • Like
Reactions: bigdawg36
If only we had a set up a system by which accused people could dispute the veracity of their allegations. Instead, Flynn, who is guilty, pleaded guilty. He has now admitted in open court to lying to the FBI.

He had no choice, this corrupt lawyer who has a history of corruption was going to go after his children. The man was going broke defending himself. He couldn't go any further. Its what these corrupt POS do. They find some process crime and run with it even though it has NOTHING to do with what they're investigating. As the article says. The FBI didn't think he lied. Its a cheesedick way to comport one's self

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/22/christopher-wray-robert-muellers-top-prosecutor-kn/

 
  • Like
Reactions: benchwarmerdawg
He had no choice, this corrupt lawyer who has a history of corruption was going to go after his children. The man was going broke defending himself. He couldn't go any further. Its what these corrupt POS do. They find some process crime and run with it even though it has NOTHING to do with what they're investigating. As the article says. The FBI didn't think he lied. Its a cheesedick way to comport one's self

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/22/christopher-wray-robert-muellers-top-prosecutor-kn/

It’s a wonderful story, but he could have had counse appointed if he couldn’t afford one.

Or, in the alternative, there’s actually a legal procedure by which you can plead guilty without admitting wrongdoing. It’s literally used every day in courts around the country. He didn’t do that either.

So, you have to believe that he lied in open court when he didn’t have to. If you want to travel under that theory, be my guest. I’m going to assume a decorated general has the balls to stick up for himself.
 
It’s a wonderful story, but he could have had counse appointed if he couldn’t afford one.

Or, in the alternative, there’s actually a legal procedure by which you can plead guilty without admitting wrongdoing. It’s literally used every day in courts around the country. He didn’t do that either.

So, you have to believe that he lied in open court when he didn’t have to. If you want to travel under that theory, be my guest. I’m going to assume a decorated general has the balls to stick up for himself.
Again, about something that had nothing to do with the investigation. None of Muller's indictments have had anything at all to do with what he was charged to do. There is plenty of corruption on his own side at the FBI and Justice to get some real indictments ......but we all know that's not important in the eyes of the swamp
 
  • Like
Reactions: benchwarmerdawg
Again, about something that had nothing to do with the investigation. None of Muller's indictments have had anything at all to do with what he was charged to do. There is plenty of corruption on his own side at the FBI and Justice to get some real indictments ......but we all know that's not important in the eyes of the swamp
Well, see, now you’re shifting gears on me. It’s a neat tactic, but maybe let’s stick with one topic.
 
Same topic. The corrupting runs deep. A guy with a long distinguished career is ruined by a pack of lunatic liberals
Wouldn’t have happened if he hadn’t lied to the FBI. It’s easy not to do that. Now he is a convicted felon by his own admission.

I guess if you’re looking for a tragedy there, point the finger at Flynn. I assume you believe in personal responsibility.
 
Funny, guys like you think that Trump has done nothing wrong, and continue to blame every admistration prior to this cluster f"ck thats in office now.
Name one thing that he has done against the law? Not things you disagree with. Just one itty bitty thing. I can give you several for your liberal socialist hero's. I will give you 2 for every thing you give against Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgHammarskjold
Wouldn’t have happened if he hadn’t lied to the FBI. It’s easy not to do that. Now he is a convicted felon by his own admission.

I guess if you’re looking for a tragedy there, point the finger at Flynn. I assume you believe in personal responsibility.
The FBI didn't think he lied. They thought he'd be let off....we shocked he was charged. But hey the Government needs their allies. But excuse me while I resist Government overreach and bullying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benchwarmerdawg
The FBI didn't think he lied. They thought he'd be let off....we shocked he was charged. But hey the Government needs their allies. But excuse me while I resist Government overreach and bullying.
He admitted to lying to them, so he must have. Or do you think he was lying about lying to them?

I’ve already explained this. You can plead not guilty. That’s how law works. Hell you can even plead guilty and not admit to breaking the law.
 
He admitted to lying to them, so he must have. Or do you think he was lying about lying to them?

I’ve already explained this. You can plead not guilty. That’s how law works. Hell you can even plead guilty and not admit to breaking the law.
No see you're an insider. He didn't have the money, you don't use a court appointed dipshit for stuff like this. We don't have a justice system, we have a open bank for lawyers (no offense meant) its a big scam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benchwarmerdawg
No see you're an insider. He didn't have the money, you don't use a court appointed dipshit for stuff like this. We don't have a justice system, we have a open bank for lawyers (no offense meant) its a big scam.
Like I said, he could have pled guilty without admitting guilt. He didn’t do that. He did exactly what he was accused of and admitted as much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigdawg36
Funny, guys like you think that Trump has done nothing wrong, and continue to blame every admistration prior to this cluster f"ck thats in office now.

I only prefer to discuss the facts, not involve emotions or innuendo.

Since you appear to have facts about Trump that we don’t, please list all of his wrong doings...especially the deeds involving collusion with Russia and any other tidbits that warrant appointing the special counsel, Bob Mueller.
 
If only we had a set up a system by which accused people could dispute the veracity of their allegations. Instead, Flynn, who is guilty, pleaded guilty. He has now admitted in open court to lying to the FBI.

What frustrates me is the apparent double standard or separate but unequal justice systems (plural).
 
I only prefer to discuss the facts, not involve emotions or innuendo.

Since you appear to have facts about Trump that we don’t, please list all of his wrong doings...especially the deeds involving collusion with Russia and any other tidbits that warrant appointing the special counsel, Bob Mueller.
Nobody on this board deals in absolute fact. We all listen and read from news forums and websites and base our opinions off them. Including myself. A lot of you go around saying he hasn’t done anything wrong and hold it as gospel. You don’t know one way or the other. He could be innocent. But he acts like he has a lot to hide. JMO.... Only thing factual is he’s a piece of shit of a human being. That’s not an emotion. Just an observation
 
Like I said, he could have pled guilty without admitting guilt. He didn’t do that. He did exactly what he was accused of and admitted as much.

In 2004, a teammate on my son’s baseball team his step-father was a US Attorney based in Atlanta and the investigation at the time was “pay for play” bribery during Bill Campbell’s tenure as Mayor. We had a very brief non-specific conversation about Federal investigations.

He said something to me that gave me chills and resonated / stuck with me. He said “we have to error on the side of caution when bringing charges or an investigation, because once we do (Federal Government) so, it will ruin and bankrupt the individual”.
 
Nobody on this board deals in absolute fact. We all listen and read from news forums and websites and base our opinions off them. Including myself. A lot of you go around saying he hasn’t done anything wrong and hold it as gospel. You don’t know one way or the other. He could be innocent. But he acts like he has a lot to hide. JMO.... Only thing factual is he’s a piece of shit of a human being. That’s not an emotion. Just an observation

If we follow your premise “he acts like he has a lot to hide”, then the same could be said for Obama & Clinton(s) as well. I’ll follow your lead, and the only thing factual about Obama & Clinton(s) is they are big piles of shit and questionable if they are human beings. That’s not emotions, just their collective experience over the past 40 years. Just a well documented observation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgHammarskjold
If we follow your premise “he acts like he has a lot to hide”, then the same could be said for Obama & Clinton(s) as well. I’ll follow your lead, and the only thing factual about Obama & Clinton(s) is they are big piles of shit and questionable if they are human beings. That’s not emotions, just their collective experience over the past 40 years. Just a well documented observation.
And if that’s your assessment, then I respect it. That bothers me none. I didn’t make that statement for anyone to follow. Just my thoughts on it all. I hope you didn’t take it personal
 
I don't disagree with that, but I'm not sure we are talking about the same double standards/separate justice systems.

Sure we are. Attorneys operate in such narrow veins of the law and have to operate in a world of technicalities.

I just had a Circuit Court case dismissed (I’m not the attorney, but expert witness who structured the case for counsel) today that was scheduled for this Wednesday at 9:00 AM. This was an Ad Valorem tax case in LA (Lower Alabama) that was filed by a previous attorney that I recommended to my client. We have since transitioned all Circuit Court cases to a different attorney / firm.

The opposing counsel filed a Motion for Summary Judgement to have the case thrown out on the following two technicalities:

1) The Appeal sent by Cerified Mail, had the wrong Suite # for the Secretary of the BOE;

2) The Appeal sent by Cerified Mail, the destination zip code included zip code + 4, well the + 4 was incorrect.

Even though the Appeal arrived at its intended destination and on time, the Judge dismissed the case because the Statute says it has to be correct.

My point is why was HRC not under the same set of circumstances / questioning that Flynn was. It appears to me, as a casual observer that HRC was not questioned by the FBI, she merely had “a conversation” with the FBI.
 
And if that’s your assessment, then I respect it. That bothers me none. I didn’t make that statement for anyone to follow. Just my thoughts on it all. I hope you didn’t take it personal

No not at all. Hopefully you didn’t take it personal either. To me that is one of the things that makes our Constitution so great...

The 1st Amendment, Freedom of Speech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgHammarskjold
No not at all. Hopefully you didn’t take it personal either. To me that is one of the things that makes our Constitution so great...

The 1st Amendment, Freedom of Speech.
That’s what it’s all about
 
Sure we are. Attorneys operate in such narrow veins of the law and have to operate in a world of technicalities.

I just had a Circuit Court case dismissed (I’m not the attorney, but expert witness who structured the case for counsel) today that was scheduled for this Wednesday at 9:00 AM. This was an Ad Valorem tax case in LA (Lower Alabama) that was filed by a previous attorney that I recommended to my client. We have since transitioned all Circuit Court cases to a different attorney / firm.

The opposing counsel filed a Motion for Summary Judgement to have the case thrown out on the following two technicalities:

1) The Appeal sent by Cerified Mail, had the wrong Suite # for the Secretary of the BOE;

2) The Appeal sent by Cerified Mail, the destination zip code included zip code + 4, well the + 4 was incorrect.

Even though the Appeal arrived at its intended destination and on time, the Judge dismissed the case because the Statute says it has to be correct.

My point is why was HRC not under the same set of circumstances / questioning that Flynn was. It appears to me, as a casual observer that HRC was not questioned by the FBI, she merely had “a conversation” with the FBI.
I don’t consider adherence to the law to be a technicality, but I suppose that’s what pays my bills. I understand your point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgHammarskjold
I don’t consider adherence to the law to be a technicality, but I suppose that’s what pays my bills. I understand your point.

How can you be correct and adhere to the deadline for filing the appeal by filing it with the correct person in a timely manner, but at the same time be incorrect and have the case dismissed.

To me, the statutes are in direct conflict with one another and would cost way too much to pursue further appeals.
 
Nobody on this board deals in absolute fact. We all listen and read from news forums and websites and base our opinions off them. Including myself. A lot of you go around saying he hasn’t done anything wrong and hold it as gospel. You don’t know one way or the other. He could be innocent. But he acts like he has a lot to hide. JMO.... Only thing factual is he’s a piece of shit of a human being. That’s not an emotion. Just an observation

However low he is, he is still way above killary and odumbo. We KNOW for a FACT, Killary lied repeatedly under oath, she put top secret and sensitive information on an unsecure server, destroyed evidence that had been requested by congress, lied about bengazi, got Americans killed, stole an election from Bernie, colluded with Russia to enrich herself, etc etc etc.,,,, further, odoofus and ketchup Kerry and lynch helped her cover her crimes making them guilty. I can list more but I want to stop here and ask you,, do you have the same disdain for the dims listed above as you do Trump or are you just a hypocrite?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT