Sure we are. Attorneys operate in such narrow veins of the law and have to operate in a world of technicalities.
I just had a Circuit Court case dismissed (I’m not the attorney, but expert witness who structured the case for counsel) today that was scheduled for this Wednesday at 9:00 AM. This was an Ad Valorem tax case in LA (Lower Alabama) that was filed by a previous attorney that I recommended to my client. We have since transitioned all Circuit Court cases to a different attorney / firm.
The opposing counsel filed a Motion for Summary Judgement to have the case thrown out on the following two technicalities:
1) The Appeal sent by Cerified Mail, had the wrong Suite # for the Secretary of the BOE;
2) The Appeal sent by Cerified Mail, the destination zip code included zip code + 4, well the + 4 was incorrect.
Even though the Appeal arrived at its intended destination and on time, the Judge dismissed the case because the Statute says it has to be correct.
My point is why was HRC not under the same set of circumstances / questioning that Flynn was. It appears to me, as a casual observer that HRC was not questioned by the FBI, she merely had “a conversation” with the FBI.