kinda like your responsesYep, you just game me an emoji laughing…….and now a reply of “lol”.
That’s cute, keep up the good work!
cute
great job
carry on
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
kinda like your responsesYep, you just game me an emoji laughing…….and now a reply of “lol”.
That’s cute, keep up the good work!
True. Guns are banned in schools, on campus,, and banned in specific zones. Either the shooters don’t know about the law 🙄 or they ignore it. ShockingNo, wait, we should ban guns in schools. That would solve the problem.
When something happens at one of those schools, lawsuits will follow alleging failure to retain personnel and provide safe campus. There are consequences to reducing safety measures especially if more Admin personnel are in place.I agree that they should have, but this is far from universal. In the past couple of years especially, shrinking police budgets and staffing, as well as the actions of some school boards, have forced resource officers out of many schools. In some places, the resource officers are now unarmed and must call for armed backup if there is a need.
In my own area, I have seen the school systems go from full time dedicated resource officers on school campuses just a few years ago, to part time, then to on-call only.
Those are excellent points. Secured entrances, locked, with one main entrance, ample security cameras monitoring would be a good beginning.1) if a teacher is coming face to face with a shooter….they already have the drop on you, going for your weapon pretty much insures your fate.
I like the odds of someone talking them down better.
2) Crossfire is another consideration, innocents being wounded or even worse….killed, if teachers armed.
3) some teachers that are armed, don’t have the experience as a trained retired police may have.
They may mistake an innocent person for a shooter and fire. Innocents other than intended victim could be killed/injured.
Some just don’t have the mental makeup for all of this. Pretty sure you just make the problem worse.
As I earlier stated, if you start allowing teachers to arm …..what’s next, students??
No feasible solution will completely stop it, but I think teachers being armed will make it worse.
Again as stated before:
1) Lock all doors/entrances including classroom when school is in.
2) Hire armed security at the main entrance and possibly hallways.
Nothing is guaranteed, but it will curb it all imo.
Easier said than done, it’s all money related.Those are excellent points. Secured entrances, locked, with one main entrance, ample security cameras monitoring would be a good beginning.
BS. The problem is not every thing in the world but guns. The problem is assault weapons and the failure of lawmakers to pass commmon sense gun laws. Not taking guns from hunters, etc, but just common sense things like closing loopholes and banning assault rifles. No one needs an automatic weapon to shoot a deer. We should value life, especially the lives of our children, vs. excessive gun rights.The problem could be solved or greatly diminished if our schools had armed teachers. Many teachers would elect to be trained with a firearm , others wouldn’t . These spineless , evil creatures that would try to shoot at school children & teachers will not go to schools that have signs posted ,stating that their faculty are armed.
Automatic weapons are already illegal. Stop being obtuse. There were semi automatic weapons 40 years ago. The way we handle mental illness is what has changed, and it's evident in so many different ways in our society now.BS. The problem is not every thing in the world but guns. The problem is assault weapons and the failure of lawmakers to pass commmon sense gun laws. Not taking guns from hunters, etc, but just common sense things like closing loopholes and banning assault rifles. No one needs an automatic weapon to shoot a deer. We should value life, especially the lives of our children, vs. excessive gun rights.
Yeah because trans adults are the only ones shooting kids at schoolsThere, problem solved.
Take the problem out and no problem.
Pretty damn simple logic.
huh?Automatic weapons are already illegal. Stop being obtuse. There were semi automatic weapons 40 years ago. The way we handle mental illness is what has changed, and it's evident in so many different ways in our society now.
Now you're being obtuse. If you can't admit that instead of treating the mind now we mutilate the body, then we can never have a truthful discussion. We don't treat mental illness now. We coddle the mentally unstable, make excuses for their actions, blame others for being intolerant, all the while encouraging immoral and unethical behavior in the name of acceptance.huh?
at least we try to handle mental illness now. what planet are you from?
What you hate to see, and it happens far too often in public schools, is a war while program such as security cutback while another Asst Supt, Asst Principal, or more benefits are approved. It’s called PRIORITY. Sadly, public schools aka Govt schools, have become Far too involved in politics and left wing agendas. Teacher’s Unions are horribleEasier said than done, it’s all money related.
But lives are more important. Time to bite the bullet and raise taxes (home owners). But I’m afraid you will have some reluctancy from the homeowners….especially the ones with no kids in school. Hence, probably the issue.
Something definitely needs to be put into law once and for all & made mandatory.
Private schools can make this expense part of their tuition costs.
As I believe you mentioned above, there are going to be some big azz lawsuits if not. Gonna cost more in the end.
in that case, christianist bigots, too
Or just post it around the schools that teachers are whether they are or not no one will know the truth.some will argue just to argue
having multiple people armed to protect kids is what we need
Time to bite the bullet and raise taxes (home owners).
Lib logicNo, wait, we should ban guns in schools. That would solve the problem.
What is stupid about that??I had a feeling you were about to say some stupid shit...looks like I was right unfortunately
But Wait, They already Are! Only lawbreakers (mostly disturbed libs. < that is redundant) bring guns to schools with anything but good intentions.No, wait, we should ban guns in schools. That would solve the problem.
What is stupid about that??
Look, I am not all about the over-prescription of SSRIs either, and our mental health infrastructure in the US is mostly junk, but at least you can talk about mental health now.Now you're being obtuse. If you can't admit that instead of treating the mind now we mutilate the body, then we can never have a truthful discussion. We don't treat mental illness now. We coddle the mentally unstable, make excuses for their actions, blame others for being intolerant, all the while encouraging immoral and unethical behavior in the name of acceptance.
It has to be voted on from the school district, if you don’t want it passed…..don’t vote on it.Because raising taxes on homeowners creates more issues than it resolves. There are far better ways to raise the money necessary to fund those initiatives.
I'll start -- stop giving money to Ukraine, and start using it to provide better security for American schools.
It has to be voted on from the school district, if you don’t want it passed…..don’t vote on it.
Homeowners are not paying for Ukraine….two different things.
If you don’t understand and own a home, check to see how your tax money you pay yearly is distributed.
Last I looked, local and state pay the majority of the expenses for public schools…..federal pays maybe less than 10% I believe.
Although I don’t agree with what we are doing in Ukraine, I don’t think that is a major factor expense wise.
The money has to come from somewhere if there is armed security.
It has to be voted on…..and imo, it should be voted on to help stop this craziness. Simple, you don’t like it…don’t vote for it.
If you don’t like that and want the cheaper, nonsensical way…..push for the teachers to be armed, or not.
Nobody likes to pay more taxes, but it has to come from somewhere…..
Did say before that I am not in favor of armed teachers….gave the reasons why, but that wasn’t one of them…and there are probably more.All good points, and you aren’t even taking into account the cost of liability insurance for schools that allow armed teachers on campus. Whatever the school system is paying now would skyrocket.
Pretty sure we had guns 30-40 yrs ago…where were all the school shootings then? it’s pretty obvious this problem starts with mental healthPoint to ponder: Over 90% of mass shootings occur in "gun free zones."
No one HAS an automatic weapon to shoot deer, get lost.BS. The problem is not every thing in the world but guns. The problem is assault weapons and the failure of lawmakers to pass commmon sense gun laws. Not taking guns from hunters, etc, but just common sense things like closing loopholes and banning assault rifles. No one needs an automatic weapon to shoot a deer. We should value life, especially the lives of our children, vs. excessive gun rights.
So how would you compare mental health 40 years ago to today? Better or worse now?Look, I am not all about the over-prescription of SSRIs either, and our mental health infrastructure in the US is mostly junk, but at least you can talk about mental health now.
40 years ago you could barely get a diagnosis for dyslexia, much less depression.
I think it's just as prevalent. The human condition is the human condition.So how would you compare mental health 40 years ago to today? Better or worse now?
Hell, have armed security & armed teachers that have taken a proper training class in self defense with a firearm. The criminals aren’t going there, not a chance in hell! My sister is a teacher & handles a handgun very well, she would love to have a chance to defend herself & her students if put in that type of situation. At the very least, her & her students would have a chance, without a sidearm , that chance would be greatly diminished!
What kind of person would look forward to being put in a situation where they're the only thing standing between a crazed murderer and innocent schoolchildren?My sister is a teacher & handles a handgun very well, she would love to have a chance to defend herself & her students if put in that type of situation.
I think it's just as prevalent. The human condition is the human condition.
It's more visible now because there are more people now seeking help and more resources for them to access, and it's less taboo to do so.
I would also say that today more people who don't need them use antidepressants etc. as a crutch, but that was also true to a lesser extent (because less visible, more taboo)in the 50s - just different drugs.
I would also say that people are overusing SSRIs in part because no one wants to / has time to do the work / therapy that is important to make sure you don't become chronically dependent on
great postHell, have armed security & armed teachers that have taken a proper training class in self defense with a firearm. The criminals aren’t going there, not a chance in hell! My sister is a teacher & handles a handgun very well, she would love to have a chance to defend herself & her students if put in that type of situation. At the very least, her & her students would have a chance, without a sidearm , that chance would be greatly diminished!
Man, the right sure has been on a culture war kick for the past few years...
First it was the nothingburger of CRT, then pedophilia and grooming, bans on books and now an all-out war against LGBTQ+. Republicans are using perverted fictions about LGBTQ people to advance a bleak political and social agenda. Old-school social conservatism is underpinning all of this. Rolling back public acceptance of transgender people and repealing same-sex marriage has been a long-term goal of the Republican party, even if they stopped talking about it for several years while public opinion turned against them.
Now, they see an opportunity to revive those goals and punish the LGBTQ community for simply existing. It's a good thing public opinion is still against them.
....
“acceptance of transgender people”???Man, the right sure has been on a culture war kick for the past few years...
First it was the nothingburger of CRT, then pedophilia and grooming, bans on books and now an all-out war against LGBTQ+. Republicans are using perverted fictions about LGBTQ people to advance a bleak political and social agenda. Old-school social conservatism is underpinning all of this. Rolling back public acceptance of transgender people and repealing same-sex marriage has been a long-term goal of the Republican party, even if they stopped talking about it for several years while public opinion turned against them.
Now, they see an opportunity to revive those goals and punish the LGBTQ community for simply existing. It's a good thing public opinion is still against them.
Trannies are mentally ill folks!! They should be treated as such! They don’t need to be treated as hero’s! I’m pretty sure no one on here would think the same of a 40 year old dude dressing up as Superman and attempting to fly to work everyday! What’s the damn difference! Both have mental issues!!
I wonder if that is because you don't know any? but I also think that "tolerate" is just fine.“acceptance of transgender people”???
Shat, more like tolerate 4 me.
Not a dayum thing I can do about it, they’ve been around forever,….so I don’t spend time worrying about it.
However, I will never invite them to dinner, welcome them to my neighborhood nor will I ever be welcoming them to any public restroom or dressing/locker room that I or any of my family are in.
That’s where I draw the line….and they will know it. They should go to the one that they were born to go in.
Older??I wonder if that is because you don't know any? but I also think that "tolerate" is just fine.
The good news for you is that you are an older, Southern he/him, and They generally are wary of Those.
That wasn't a shot.Older??
Man, the right sure has been on a culture war kick for the past few years...
First it was the nothingburger of CRT, then pedophilia and grooming, bans on books and now an all-out war against LGBTQ+. Republicans are using perverted fictions about LGBTQ people to advance a bleak political and social agenda. Old-school social conservatism is underpinning all of this. Rolling back public acceptance of transgender people and repealing same-sex marriage has been a long-term goal of the Republican party, even if they stopped talking about it for several years while public opinion turned against them.
Now, they see an opportunity to revive those goals and punish the LGBTQ community for simply existing. It's a good thing public opinion is still against them.
Just because it's effective politics doesn't mean the issue is being presented honestly.You mean the same CRT "nothingburger" that has won the GOP several gubernatorial seats (Virginia most notably) and has flipped countless school boards to conservative majorities?
It's interesting that you liberals still don't see the issues. Makes things much easier for Republicans.