Obama promised a $2500 savings and said it would "bend the cost curve down"
what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.Obama promised a $2500 savings and said it would "bend the cost curve down"
You ought to see the auto and home premiums in comparison due to this economy. I have been in the industry 25 years. Nothing like it. On the auto side the inflation has just done things I never thought I would see. No one even mentions what inflation has done here. I have people daily making hard choices on even to own a car. Something that should be pretty simple. What comes with it is too expensive for some. I feel so bad for every person I hear from in their struggles. I just can’t believe anyone would sign up to make it worse.
I went from less than $350.00 per month with a $3500.00 deductible to $1650.00 per month with a $6500.00 per person deductible but hey, if I decide I want my dork sawed off, I'm covered. The ACA was nothing but a shell game and there was NEVER a way you were going to cover more people, offer more services and save a substantial amount of money. Like everything else about O, it was just a slick con designed to give the government more power over the citizens and transfer money to their preferred constituents.what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
Dims had the majority so the pubs had no say. So quit that crap about the pubs, they changed the rules to pass it.what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
fundamental misunderstanding of how the legislative process works here.Dims had the majority so the pubs had no say. So quit that crap about the pubs, they changed the rules to pass it.
and yet... most other industrialized nations are able to do it.The ACA was nothing but a shell game and there was NEVER a way you were going to cover more people, offer more services and save a substantial amount of money.
I would argue that most industrialized nations save money by limiting access and not by being incredibly efficient. Additionally, governments are able to shift costs in order to make project A look more efficient by charging portions of the costs to project B.and yet... most other industrialized nations are able to do it.
Yes. Anyone in this industry knows what happened. There were so many indigent people being covered out there reform was necessary. The only thing that happened was the expense was passed along to people who will pay for their health insurance before anything else. And pay 400 percent more in some cases with a higher deductible. That was one of the big reasons Trump got elected imo. They messed with folks money. They the irs fined you for not taking out Obama care. The industry has worked around it. But it cost us some good doctors and hospitals. It didn’t fix the problem at all. I will give Obama credit for at least trying to fix a broken system. I am not sure he didn’t make things worse.I went from less than $350.00 per month with a $3500.00 deductible to $1650.00 per month with a $6500.00 per person deductible but hey, if I decide I want my dork sawed off, I'm covered. The ACA was nothing but a shell game and there was NEVER a way you were going to cover more people, offer more services and save a substantial amount of money. Like everything else about O, it was just a slick con designed to give the government more power over the citizens and transfer money to their preferred constituents.
Yeah right, I have a Canadian neighbor that has told me multiple times that their socialized medicine system sucks balls. There are thousands of rich Canadians that come down to the States for surgeries every month.and yet... most other industrialized nations are able to do it.
Do you honestly want the Government involved in your health care ?what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
access to healthcare in the US is nothing to cheer about.I would argue that most industrialized nations save money by limiting access and not by being incredibly efficient. Additionally, governments are able to shift costs in order to make project A look more efficient by charge portions of the costs to project B.
According to the dimwit Libs, the ACA was the greatest thing ever and you should be glad to have it.I went from less than $350.00 per month with a $3500.00 deductible to $1650.00 per month with a $6500.00 per person deductible but hey, if I decide I want my dork sawed off, I'm covered. The ACA was nothing but a shell game and there was NEVER a way you were going to cover more people, offer more services and save a substantial amount of money. Like everything else about O, it was just a slick con designed to give the government more power over the citizens and transfer money to their preferred constituents.
already is and has been. I don't hear people complain about Medicare.Do you honestly want the Government involved in your health care ?1
thank DeJoy.I cant even get mailed delivered to me in a timely fashion anymore.
no one says this.According to the dimwit Libs, the ACA was the greatest thing ever and you should be glad to have it.
all of them in Europe.Name one other industrialized nation that you can compare to the US. Ill wait.
You just told me this yesterday .no one says this.
"he" being the negotiations - Rs had a part in it as you know.trying to fix a broken system. I am not sure he didn’t make things worse.
Who does he work for?already is and has been. I don't hear people complain about Medicare.
thank DeJoy.
I didn't say it was the greatest thing ever my man.You just told me this yesterday .
The US has 340 million people.all of them in Europe.
if you will only accept countries that have the same population as the US, then I am afraid you are unwilling to accept any comparison.The US has 340 million people.
Cars are crazy, recently replaced 3 within a year and a half…bought new, it made better sense.You ought to see the auto and home premiums in comparison due to this economy. I have been in the industry 25 years. Nothing like it. On the auto side the inflation has just done things I never thought I would see. No one even mentions what inflation has done here. I have people daily making hard choices on even to own a car. Something that should be pretty simple. What comes with it is too expensive for some. I feel so bad for every person I hear from in their struggles. I just can’t believe anyone would sign up to make it worse.
State Farm reports monster loss for 2023
Policies up, record new policy volumewww.insurancebusinessmag.com
State Farm Underwriting Loss Climbs to $14B - Carrier Management
When State Farm reported a $13 billion underwriting loss for 2022, it was the largest in the auto insurance giant’s history. A year later, and another record. The underwriting loss figure climbed to $14 billion for 2023, with a nearly $5 billion underwriting loss for property lines outpacing...www.carriermanagement.com
Competition in this industry will always give a fighting chance. But only to folks with great credit and a good claim history. Forget it otherwise.
3 things.if you will only accept countries that have the same population as the US, then I am afraid you are unwilling to accept any comparison.
we are the wealthiest nation in the world by far. if we can't take care of our people - and healthcare statistics especially in red states and complaints like your own indicate that we cannot - then what are we even doing?
No, it's not. Now, I will be the first to admit the old system had some issues that needed to be addressed. One of those issues was the practice of collecting premiums for a decade or 2 and then pricing someone beyond their ability to pay if they became chronically ill. People were being screwed by insurance companies that had collected money to insure them from the situation they were in. Confronting this issue didn't require Nancy Pelosi and friends to write the only policies that would be allowed for sale.I didn't say it was the greatest thing ever my man.
roll tape > "while the ACA is not the best of all possible worlds, it is better than the pre-existing condition of health insurance prior to its passage."
You think the princess, that has cancer, went thru the same process as the normal brits. Most die before they get treatment or deemed too old and just get pain meds.all of them in Europe.
My Blue cross for Family of 4 was $396/month prior. Immediately went to $1120 month when Obamacare was passed. No longer with Blue cross. Deductible increased. And worst of all, none of our doctors would accept the new crap. This was typical with ALL of the self employed people I know. Absolutely destroyed health insurance.what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
My same story.My Blue cross for Family of 4 was $396/month prior. Immediately went to $1120 month when Obamacare was passed. No longer with Blue cross. Deductible increased. And worst of all, none of our doctors would accept the new crap. This was typical with ALL of the self employed people I know. Absolutely destroyed health insurance.
This is complete garbage.I didn't say it was the greatest thing ever my man.
roll tape > "while the ACA is not the best of all possible worlds, it is better than the pre-existing condition of health insurance prior to its passage."
Thank you, you said it better than I tried to. The US has 340 million people in it, 80% of them are either obese, out of shape or have pre existing conditions. Imagine the cost of insuring everyone now.3 things.
Our debt is $35 TRILLION
Also, we are the policemen of the world and spend at least twice as much of our GDP on the military than any of these other countries.
Lastly, everyone's federal income tax would at least double and there will be almost no desire by politicians or support from taxpayers for this.
Obamacare is a disaster and going even further would destroy the economy and ultimately the country.
That’s absolutely ridiculous! Goes to show what the government take over of healthcare looks like. Commie gonna Commie!
And unless I missed it somewhere in this thread, the shortage of physicians certainly doesn’t help.Thank you, you said it better than I tried to. The US has 340 million people in it, 80% of them are either obese, out of shape or have pre existing conditions. Imagine the cost of insuring everyone now.
BUT GOVERNMENT MO BETTAH.
Need to go back to private insurance and get rid of that government garbage.No, it's not. Now, I will be the first to admit the old system had some issues that needed to be addressed. One of those issues was the practice of collecting premiums for a decade or 2 and then pricing someone beyond their ability to pay if they became chronically ill. People were being screwed by insurance companies that had collected money to insure them from the situation they were in. Confronting this issue didn't require Nancy Pelosi and friends to write the only policies that would be allowed for sale.
Next, we did need a mechanism to assist those with pre-existing conditions but the answer wasn't to kick them off plans and force young and healthy purchasers to absorb their cost when they reapplied as potential insured with pre-existing conditions.
Finally, I shouldn't be buying maternity insurance and I should be able to choose if I want mental health coverage or gender transition coverage. Historically, I could keep my cost down by choosing the level of coverage I wanted, the items of coverage I would decline and the level of risk I presented to the insurance company. (healthy lifestyle choices) Now, I simply have to pay a premium price for a garbage product that features a yearly premium that is greater than my old total out of pocket exposure. I'd take my old policy at twice the rate tomorrow if I could buy a similar policy.
And that’s just another lie and it’s just a reason for the libs to continue to try to be like the new world order. We are a sovereign nation and not a part of this new world order.and yet... most other industrialized nations are able to do it.
and yet... most other industrialized nations are able to do it.
THANK YOU Barack INSANE OIDIOT!!!
If I am paying less but getting the same quality, I am all for it. The devil is in the details, until I see it…..I am good where I am.I'm sorry for anyone who had an increase in their insurance premiums, but I am tired of hearing how bad the ACA was.
I seriously think you refuse to consider anything else just because it was a Democrat. This country is so divided it's like two countries. A poll shows 91% of the Democrats thought Harris won and only 14% of the Republicans agreed (just the debate and not who you are voting for).
My wife and I were paying $36,000 a year right before, because I couldn't get coverage for pre-existing conditions under a new policy, ACA would have been so welcome. Fortunately I was going on Medicare which has been great. So there are always two sides to everything.
The law is not perfect but moved in the right direction I believe. Unfortunately the two parties have not been able to move forward with any significant changes.
same - self employed and got screwed by a doctor who (selling Advair!) said I had asthma, which I didn't and don't, but thereafter I had a rider that said they wouldn't cover me for pulmonary care.My wife and I were paying $36,000 a year right before, because I couldn't get coverage for pre-existing conditions under a new policy, ACA would have been so welcome. Fortunately I was going on Medicare which has been great. So there are always two sides to everything.