ADVERTISEMENT

US family health insurance premiums

Obama promised a $2500 savings and said it would "bend the cost curve down"
what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
 
Obama promised a $2500 savings and said it would "bend the cost curve down"

You ought to see the auto and home premiums in comparison due to this economy. I have been in the industry 25 years. Nothing like it. On the auto side the inflation has just done things I never thought I would see. No one even mentions what inflation has done here. I have people daily making hard choices on even to own a car. Something that should be pretty simple. What comes with it is too expensive for some. I feel so bad for every person I hear from in their struggles. I just can’t believe anyone would sign up to make it worse.




Competition in this industry will always give a fighting chance. But only to folks with great credit and a good claim history. Forget it otherwise.
 
what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
I went from less than $350.00 per month with a $3500.00 deductible to $1650.00 per month with a $6500.00 per person deductible but hey, if I decide I want my dork sawed off, I'm covered. The ACA was nothing but a shell game and there was NEVER a way you were going to cover more people, offer more services and save a substantial amount of money. Like everything else about O, it was just a slick con designed to give the government more power over the citizens and transfer money to their preferred constituents.
 
what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
Dims had the majority so the pubs had no say. So quit that crap about the pubs, they changed the rules to pass it.
 
and yet... most other industrialized nations are able to do it.
I would argue that most industrialized nations save money by limiting access and not by being incredibly efficient. Additionally, governments are able to shift costs in order to make project A look more efficient by charging portions of the costs to project B.
 
Last edited:
I went from less than $350.00 per month with a $3500.00 deductible to $1650.00 per month with a $6500.00 per person deductible but hey, if I decide I want my dork sawed off, I'm covered. The ACA was nothing but a shell game and there was NEVER a way you were going to cover more people, offer more services and save a substantial amount of money. Like everything else about O, it was just a slick con designed to give the government more power over the citizens and transfer money to their preferred constituents.
Yes. Anyone in this industry knows what happened. There were so many indigent people being covered out there reform was necessary. The only thing that happened was the expense was passed along to people who will pay for their health insurance before anything else. And pay 400 percent more in some cases with a higher deductible. That was one of the big reasons Trump got elected imo. They messed with folks money. They the irs fined you for not taking out Obama care. The industry has worked around it. But it cost us some good doctors and hospitals. It didn’t fix the problem at all. I will give Obama credit for at least trying to fix a broken system. I am not sure he didn’t make things worse.
 
and yet... most other industrialized nations are able to do it.
Yeah right, I have a Canadian neighbor that has told me multiple times that their socialized medicine system sucks balls. There are thousands of rich Canadians that come down to the States for surgeries every month.

Name one other industrialized nation that you can compare to the US. Ill wait.
 
what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
Do you honestly want the Government involved in your health care ?

I cant even get mailed delivered to me in a timely fashion anymore.
 
I would argue that most industrialized nations save money by limiting access and not by being incredibly efficient. Additionally, governments are able to shift costs in order to make project A look more efficient by charge portions of the costs to project B.
access to healthcare in the US is nothing to cheer about.

I know many many people who do not have a primary care doctor (and mine just retired, so I guess I am among them!)

"In 2022, U.S. healthcare spending reached $4.5 trillion, which averages to $13,493 per person. By comparison, the average cost of healthcare per person in other wealthy countries is less than half as much."

socialism blah blah, but HALF?!
 
I went from less than $350.00 per month with a $3500.00 deductible to $1650.00 per month with a $6500.00 per person deductible but hey, if I decide I want my dork sawed off, I'm covered. The ACA was nothing but a shell game and there was NEVER a way you were going to cover more people, offer more services and save a substantial amount of money. Like everything else about O, it was just a slick con designed to give the government more power over the citizens and transfer money to their preferred constituents.
According to the dimwit Libs, the ACA was the greatest thing ever and you should be glad to have it.

I posted in another thread yesterday about the BCBS policy I had before they dropped me. I almost had to file for BK.

Last year I had an ACA policy through Ambetter for my healthy 22 yo son. The premium was more than my car payment and the ded was $8500. After I came to me senses I cancelled it after 3 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dirty Hairy Dawg
trying to fix a broken system. I am not sure he didn’t make things worse.
"he" being the negotiations - Rs had a part in it as you know.

It needs to be revisited, but we need a functional Republican party in order for that to happen. Same thing re: immigration, and you saw how that went - actual work gets shut down by Donald Trump and everything grinds to a halt.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cherrydawg
The US has 340 million people.
if you will only accept countries that have the same population as the US, then I am afraid you are unwilling to accept any comparison.

we are the wealthiest nation in the world by far. if we can't take care of our people - and healthcare statistics especially in red states and complaints like your own indicate that we cannot - then what are we even doing?

GXSX8RcXoAAM7uT
 
You ought to see the auto and home premiums in comparison due to this economy. I have been in the industry 25 years. Nothing like it. On the auto side the inflation has just done things I never thought I would see. No one even mentions what inflation has done here. I have people daily making hard choices on even to own a car. Something that should be pretty simple. What comes with it is too expensive for some. I feel so bad for every person I hear from in their struggles. I just can’t believe anyone would sign up to make it worse.




Competition in this industry will always give a fighting chance. But only to folks with great credit and a good claim history. Forget it otherwise.
Cars are crazy, recently replaced 3 within a year and a half…bought new, it made better sense.

Good news is, all of the vehicles I replaced were great vehicles. They seem to last longer these days.

Hope the ones I replaced them with do the same.
 
if you will only accept countries that have the same population as the US, then I am afraid you are unwilling to accept any comparison.

we are the wealthiest nation in the world by far. if we can't take care of our people - and healthcare statistics especially in red states and complaints like your own indicate that we cannot - then what are we even doing?

GXSX8RcXoAAM7uT
3 things.
Our debt is $35 TRILLION
Also, we are the policemen of the world and spend at least twice as much of our GDP on the military than any of these other countries.
Lastly, everyone's federal income tax would at least double and there will be almost no desire by politicians or support from taxpayers for this.

Obamacare is a disaster and going even further would destroy the economy and ultimately the country.
 
I didn't say it was the greatest thing ever my man.

roll tape > "while the ACA is not the best of all possible worlds, it is better than the pre-existing condition of health insurance prior to its passage."
No, it's not. Now, I will be the first to admit the old system had some issues that needed to be addressed. One of those issues was the practice of collecting premiums for a decade or 2 and then pricing someone beyond their ability to pay if they became chronically ill. People were being screwed by insurance companies that had collected money to insure them from the situation they were in. Confronting this issue didn't require Nancy Pelosi and friends to write the only policies that would be allowed for sale.

Next, we did need a mechanism to assist those with pre-existing conditions but the answer wasn't to kick them off plans and force young and healthy purchasers to absorb their cost when they reapplied as potential insured with pre-existing conditions.

Finally, I shouldn't be buying maternity insurance and I should be able to choose if I want mental health coverage or gender transition coverage. Historically, I could keep my cost down by choosing the level of coverage I wanted, the items of coverage I would decline and the level of risk I presented to the insurance company. (healthy lifestyle choices) Now, I simply have to pay a premium price for a garbage product that features a yearly premium that is greater than my old total out of pocket exposure. I'd take my old policy at twice the rate tomorrow if I could buy a similar policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cherrydawg
what he promised and what Republicans allowed him to deliver were vastly different sausages. Also, it is likely that without the ACA that graph would look worse for those who would have been able to get comprehensive healthcare. There's a reason Rs were willing to deal.
My Blue cross for Family of 4 was $396/month prior. Immediately went to $1120 month when Obamacare was passed. No longer with Blue cross. Deductible increased. And worst of all, none of our doctors would accept the new crap. This was typical with ALL of the self employed people I know. Absolutely destroyed health insurance.
 
My Blue cross for Family of 4 was $396/month prior. Immediately went to $1120 month when Obamacare was passed. No longer with Blue cross. Deductible increased. And worst of all, none of our doctors would accept the new crap. This was typical with ALL of the self employed people I know. Absolutely destroyed health insurance.
My same story.
 
I didn't say it was the greatest thing ever my man.

roll tape > "while the ACA is not the best of all possible worlds, it is better than the pre-existing condition of health insurance prior to its passage."
This is complete garbage.

How is it better if premiums have increased across the board 4X since it started?

You must work for the Government as much as you simp for them, my gd man.
 
3 things.
Our debt is $35 TRILLION
Also, we are the policemen of the world and spend at least twice as much of our GDP on the military than any of these other countries.
Lastly, everyone's federal income tax would at least double and there will be almost no desire by politicians or support from taxpayers for this.

Obamacare is a disaster and going even further would destroy the economy and ultimately the country.
Thank you, you said it better than I tried to. The US has 340 million people in it, 80% of them are either obese, out of shape or have pre existing conditions. Imagine the cost of insuring everyone now.

BUT GOVERNMENT MO BETTAH.
 
Thank you, you said it better than I tried to. The US has 340 million people in it, 80% of them are either obese, out of shape or have pre existing conditions. Imagine the cost of insuring everyone now.

BUT GOVERNMENT MO BETTAH.
And unless I missed it somewhere in this thread, the shortage of physicians certainly doesn’t help.

I would be fine if they left things as they are Can’t imagine it getting cheaper, or how tough it would be to even see a doc.

Thinks it all would be a disaster…..BWTFDIK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cherrydawg
No, it's not. Now, I will be the first to admit the old system had some issues that needed to be addressed. One of those issues was the practice of collecting premiums for a decade or 2 and then pricing someone beyond their ability to pay if they became chronically ill. People were being screwed by insurance companies that had collected money to insure them from the situation they were in. Confronting this issue didn't require Nancy Pelosi and friends to write the only policies that would be allowed for sale.

Next, we did need a mechanism to assist those with pre-existing conditions but the answer wasn't to kick them off plans and force young and healthy purchasers to absorb their cost when they reapplied as potential insured with pre-existing conditions.

Finally, I shouldn't be buying maternity insurance and I should be able to choose if I want mental health coverage or gender transition coverage. Historically, I could keep my cost down by choosing the level of coverage I wanted, the items of coverage I would decline and the level of risk I presented to the insurance company. (healthy lifestyle choices) Now, I simply have to pay a premium price for a garbage product that features a yearly premium that is greater than my old total out of pocket exposure. I'd take my old policy at twice the rate tomorrow if I could buy a similar policy.
Need to go back to private insurance and get rid of that government garbage.
 
I'm sorry for anyone who had an increase in their insurance premiums, but I am tired of hearing how bad the ACA was.

I seriously think you refuse to consider anything else just because it was a Democrat. This country is so divided it's like two countries. A poll shows 91% of the Democrats thought Harris won and only 14% of the Republicans agreed (just the debate and not who you are voting for).

My wife and I were paying $36,000 a year right before, because I couldn't get coverage for pre-existing conditions under a new policy, ACA would have been so welcome. Fortunately I was going on Medicare which has been great. So there are always two sides to everything.

The law is not perfect but moved in the right direction I believe. Unfortunately the two parties have not been able to move forward with any significant changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nice marmot
I'm sorry for anyone who had an increase in their insurance premiums, but I am tired of hearing how bad the ACA was.

I seriously think you refuse to consider anything else just because it was a Democrat. This country is so divided it's like two countries. A poll shows 91% of the Democrats thought Harris won and only 14% of the Republicans agreed (just the debate and not who you are voting for).

My wife and I were paying $36,000 a year right before, because I couldn't get coverage for pre-existing conditions under a new policy, ACA would have been so welcome. Fortunately I was going on Medicare which has been great. So there are always two sides to everything.

The law is not perfect but moved in the right direction I believe. Unfortunately the two parties have not been able to move forward with any significant changes.
If I am paying less but getting the same quality, I am all for it. The devil is in the details, until I see it…..I am good where I am.

As far as the debate goes, I think Kamala won that night too…..she was composed and delivered better. But her lies and half-truths were more believable to the uninformed.

The important issues like safety/border and inflation, Trump wins by a landslide.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cherrydawg
My wife and I were paying $36,000 a year right before, because I couldn't get coverage for pre-existing conditions under a new policy, ACA would have been so welcome. Fortunately I was going on Medicare which has been great. So there are always two sides to everything.
same - self employed and got screwed by a doctor who (selling Advair!) said I had asthma, which I didn't and don't, but thereafter I had a rider that said they wouldn't cover me for pulmonary care.

the point if fully implementing the system was that it would increase the risk pool - but most red states didn't adequately implement it. Most of the deep south still has not. So if you live in Georgia, yeah, you got screwed. I have BCBS out of another state and have since 2016, which is infuriating of course because while I am lucky to do so most cannot. BCBS is great.

as well, part of the problem was the participation of pharma and the insurance companies in the initial negotiations, which were a real shitshow. and a further part of the problem was Newt Gingrich and, subsequently, the Tea Party, which has led to the dysfunction of the Republican Party as an actual legislating thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: celticdawg
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT