because Trump I am sure is just in the habit of giving $130,000 payouts to pornstars."he said she said"
did you catch their explanation for that?
because Trump I am sure is just in the habit of giving $130,000 payouts to pornstars."he said she said"
Didn't know it was illegal to pay a pornstar $130k under an NDA. The whole thing was they tried to prove he used campaign funds to pay her the $130k......You're telling me someone worth $5Billion needed to use campaign funds to use $130k? That;s what the jury surely forgot about just like you.because Trump I am sure is just in the habit of giving $130,000 payouts to pornstars.
did you catch their explanation for that?
Ummm….someone has a reading comprehension problem. #2 did not claim Truth social was their only source of news. He should check his math.
Fair and noticed after I posted. So truth and X. Clearly not the "liberal juror" of the bunch based on this info alone.Ummm….someone has a reading comprehension problem. #2 did not claim Truth social was their only source of news. He should check his math.
Maybe. I watch MSNBC along with other sources but that doesn’t make me a communist.Fair and noticed after I posted. So truth and X. Clearly not the "liberal juror" of the bunch based on this info alone.
Doesn't change the fact the juror relies on truth social for news. The convicted felon's own site...and that person voted to convict on all 34 counts.
Quite telling.
They didn’t try to prove it, they did prove it, 34 times.Didn't know it was illegal to pay a pornstar $130k under an NDA. The whole thing was they tried to prove he used campaign funds to pay her the $130k......You're telling me someone worth $5Billion needed to use campaign funds to use $130k? That;s what the jury surely forgot about just like you.
THIS 1000xs THISThey didn’t try to prove it, they did prove it, 34 times.
If Trump had just written Stormy Daniels a personal check for $130k instead having Cohen pay and then reimbursing him and fraudulently classifying those reimbursments, none of this would have happened.
No this so called tribalism when you elected a Muslim idiot who hated our country enough to destroy it and is still trying through a poor old soul named Biden. This country has turned into shit because of that traitor.It's funny you mention that, because this tribalism all started with Jerry Falwell and the Moral Majority in the early eighties. Before that you found a lot of differing views on lot of things in both parties.
You have to be joking right?They didn’t try to prove it, they did prove it, 34 times.
If Trump had just written Stormy Daniels a personal check for $130k instead having Cohen pay and then reimbursing him and fraudulently classifying those reimbursments, none of this would have happened.
Bunch of ignorant sheep following the Dem radical agenda!Didn't know it was illegal to pay a pornstar $130k under an NDA. The whole thing was they tried to prove he used campaign funds to pay her the $130k......You're telling me someone worth $5Billion needed to use campaign funds to use $130k? That;s what the jury surely forgot about just like you.
Nope. If the billionaire had written a personal check none of this happens.You have to be joking right?
You realize more democrats watch Tucker Carlson than they do Rachel madcow and cnn combined. The number of pubs who watch him were the same as others on Fox News. What made his time slot so popular was the massive number of democrats that watched him. Kind of crazy. Is an interesting tid bit, but really means jackshit.Fair and noticed after I posted. So truth and X. Clearly not the "liberal juror" of the bunch based on this info alone.
Doesn't change the fact the juror relies on truth social for news. The convicted felon's own site...and that person voted to convict on all 34 counts.
Quite telling.
Ominously so. Very sad day for those who believe in and would die for our Constitution. God bless the USA!In all seriousness though this is a dark day for America as it shows there is not enough social fabric left to make up an actual American nation.
You actually can do that legally all day long.None of us will be able to sleep with a porn star, pay her not to talk and cover up the payment ever again.
Yes, you can, as long as you make the payment yourself instead of running it through your business, having someone else make the payment for you, reimburse that person over time while improperly accounting those reimbursements, all in an effort to suppress unflattering news before an election.You actually can do that legally all day long.
What exactly was unconstitutional about the trial?Ominously so. Very sad day for those who believe in and would die for our Constitution. God bless the USA!
Alvin Bragg issued a political "bill of attainder" when he ran for office when he said he would get Trump.What exactly was unconstitutional about the trial?
Have a quote for exactly what Alvin Bragg said, because I've seen some contradictory information regarding those campaign promises.Alvin Bragg issued a political "bill of attainder" when he ran for office when he said he would get Trump.
Also, Constitution allows for a defendant to present their defense. Judicial rules require a judge to err on the side of the defense when allowing evidence and witnesses in. This most assuredly didn't happen.
You also forgot the part where the statute of limitations had run out on the misdemeanor charges so they crafted these bullshit charges .Alvin Bragg issued a political "bill of attainder" when he ran for office when he said he would get Trump.
Also, Constitution allows for a defendant to present their defense. Judicial rules require a judge to err on the side of the defense when allowing evidence and witnesses in. This most assuredly didn't happen.
Here's a quote from Newsweek.Have a quote for exactly what Alvin Bragg said, because I've seen some contradictory information regarding those campaign promises.
Do you think there is a possibility that a Trump hating smooth brain might just lie about their news sources to get on the jury of the century?
A gag order from the obviously biased judge unconstitutionally restricting the free speech rights of the defendant. Not identifying what crime was committed until the trial was over. Not allowing expert testimony for the defendant. The judge refused to recuse himself despite being a donor to the democrat party and having a daughter who works for a democrat firm raising money on the trial, which lasted a highly unusually long time despite there being almost no evidence put forth by the prosecution against the defendant. Not being granted a change of venue from Manhattan, which is well-known to be loaded with jurors who are democrats. And quite a few things which were unconstitutional in the instructions to the jury, including telling the jury they didn't need to be unanimous in order to find the defendant guilty. I'm sure I'm missing more instances of constitutional violations from what appears to be the worst judge in the history of the judiciary.What exactly was unconstitutional about the trial?
Not if we are running for public office. Your freedom is being taken and you don't even realize it.You actually can do that legally all day long.
Nothing you listed is unconstitutional or based on fact. Not one of them.A gag order from the obviously biased judge unconstitutionally restricting the free speech rights of the defendant. Not identifying what crime was committed until the trial was over. Not allowing expert testimony for the defendant. The judge refused to recuse himself despite being a donor to the democrat party and having a daughter who works for a democrat firm raising money on the trial, which lasted a highly unusually long time despite there being almost no evidence put forth by the prosecution against the defendant. Not being granted a change of venue from Manhattan, which is well-known to be loaded with jurors who are democrats. And quite a few things which were unconstitutional in the instructions to the jury, including telling the jury they didn't need to be unanimous in order to find the defendant guilty. I'm sure I'm missing more instances of constitutional violations from what appears to be the worst judge in the history of the judiciary.
I sure hope you are not a LawDawg. My goodness.A gag order from the obviously biased judge unconstitutionally restricting the free speech rights of the defendant. Not identifying what crime was committed until the trial was over. Not allowing expert testimony for the defendant. The judge refused to recuse himself despite being a donor to the democrat party and having a daughter who works for a democrat firm raising money on the trial, which lasted a highly unusually long time despite there being almost no evidence put forth by the prosecution against the defendant. Not being granted a change of venue from Manhattan, which is well-known to be loaded with jurors who are democrats. And quite a few things which were unconstitutional in the instructions to the jury, including telling the jury they didn't need to be unanimous in order to find the defendant guilty. I'm sure I'm missing more instances of constitutional violations from what appears to be the worst judge in the history of the judiciary.
Not unconstitutional to someone who doesn’t know anything about the constitution. You’re just a echo chamber for the radical left.Nothing you listed is unconstitutional or based on fact. Not one of them.
But keep on keeping on...
I sure hope you are not a LawDawg.Not unconstitutional to someone who doesn’t know anything about the constitution. You’re just a echo chamber for the radical left.
I wish I was.I sure hope you are not a LawDawg.
I get your point but they don't have half the nation at all, that itself is a lieI don’t think watching half the nation gleefully cheer a corrupt judge and a corrupt prosecutor obtain a guilty verdict on 34 corrupt charges against the man the other half of the nation is voting for needs much elaboration.
It shows we are not “one nation under God”.
It’s really amazing how the Hart Cellar act destroyed the country within 60 years.
Walker you are 100% right. Couldn’t agree more.Didn't know it was illegal to pay a pornstar $130k under an NDA. The whole thing was they tried to prove he used campaign funds to pay her the $130k......You're telling me someone worth $5Billion needed to use campaign funds to use $130k? That;s what the jury surely forgot about just like you.
its obvious you are not a legal eagle either, but here is one you can listen to, its short and shoots you chat "legal scholars" right out of the saddle.I sure hope you are not a LawDawg.
34-0 That's a blowout
That is not correct. 100% guarantee that person lied in order to get on the jury. No one gets their news only from truth social and X. They knew it would get Trump’s team to let them on. They are the most liberal in the jury. They lied.Did you even see that one juror gets all their news from truth social and even they didn't vote not guilty on one single count? All you need is one juror...ONE...and even that person was like "yeah...that dude's super guilty".
"loon libs" and stop on to another post. Would you mind telling me where you practice so I know not to send my fam there?corrupt judge and DA. This case will get dismissed as soon as it gets to a non biased judge who actually follows the law and constitution. But you loon libs don’t care about any of that. Get over your TDS. You’re voting for Biden who is a corrupt stupid evil SOB who has just about ruined our country in three years and the world is on fire in large part from his policies. That makes you an idiot in my book if you vote for Biden. When we are attacked from within from terrorists thank Joe and you libs who let them walk across our border. Venezuela gang member who brutally murdered an Athens student is 100% Biden’s fault.
You actually think I'd read all of that from you?its obvious you are not a legal eagle either, but here is one you can listen to, its short and shoots you chat "legal scholars" right out of the saddle.
MSN
www.msn.com
Further, you tds sufferers cry about j6 and the damage to democracy yet applaud the weaponization of the legal system to take out a political foe. Now smart guy, tell us one of the main things that brought Rome down, "hint, it was the exact same thing your side has done here". More harm was done to America with these "trumped' up charges and verdicts against the opposition candidate than J6 ever did. Yet because its trump supposed "democracy" loving democrats are willing to trample all over it and ignore the abuses of it.
It is also hilarious when dims say we have to respect the trial and the jury and the judge when a simple interweb search will show how the same folks and their sheep followers have threatened, disrespected, and talked down the SCOTUS and many of its members. Not only that, another "trumped" up case against the man has a judge that's not an activist tds sufferer and is not letting the prosecution trample on the law, dims are going ding bat crazy about Judge Cannon.
You dims are so obvious in your limited actual care about rights and the constitution. Just get Trump and keep the demented pedophile in office. Thats all that matters to the tds crowd. SMH You are especially great at taking statements out of context and using the spin machine of the left to smack down those that disagree with you. You really don't know as much as you think and your total disregard for the country and what this admin is doing to it is alarming and scarry. I hope and pray there are not many people that agree with you and the other tds sufferers here. We won't be a country if dims are allowed to get away with the blatant politicization of the doj/fbi/cia/irs etc etc etc that has been going on for the last 3.5 years. You say you are worried about trump being a dictator when that is exactly what the dims are trying to do. The open borders allowing millions of unemployed gov benefit seeking ILLEGALS in. Even if they don't vote this time, by the time the next election gets here they will be voting. Dims are pushing for it as hard as they can. ONE PARTY RULE. Eventually a dictator. Then POOF, the country you folks supposedly are protecting from Trump is GONE> You can laugh and poo poo this all you want. Just shows how little you actually pay attention to what is going on in your own country.
Hopefully, pubs will grow a set and treat the crooked dims in DC as Trump has been treated. Just make up something and get a red state DA to bring them down. After all, gotta respect trials and juries right>?
And no I am not all in on Trump. I have said and will say again, I have never voted for him in a primary but I will most assuredly be voting for him in the general because he is better for every American than the law breaking, lying, senile, pedophile in office and running on the dim ticket. A third party vote does not help defeat the dim because no third party is going to win in 2024.
It's not illegal to pay a pornstar. So many people talking about this and don't understand. Piers Morgan also doesn't understand what the charges were.Walker you are 100% right. Couldn’t agree more.
But Donald Trump understands them and admitted as such...in court...It's not illegal to pay a pornstar. So many people talking about this and don't understand. Piers Morgan also doesn't understand what the charges were.
Everything I posted is absolutely true. You stay in your little blue bubble where ignorance is bliss, why don't you?Nothing you listed is unconstitutional or based on fact. Not one of them.
But keep on keeping on...