ADVERTISEMENT

Dominion voting machines in Federal Court, Atlanta

PotimusWillie

B2B Caffeinated Nat’l Champion
Gold Member
Jan 5, 2009
18,786
31,629
167
Last Friday in Federal Court in Atlanta, in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenburg

Huddled around a voting machine in a federal courtroom, a small crowd watched as expert witness Alex Halderman demonstrated how someone could meddle with a Georgia election within seconds manipulating the Dominion Voting machines.

Halderman, a University of Michigan computer scientist, changed results of a hypothetical referendum on Sunday alcohol sales. He flipped the winner in a theoretical election between President George Washington and Benedict Arnold, the Revolutionary War general who defected to the British. He rigged the machine to print out as many ballots as he wanted.

All he needed was a pen to reach a button inside the touchscreen, a fake $10 voter card he had programmed, or a $100 USB device that he plugged into a cord connected to a printer, rewriting the touchscreen’s code.

Professor Halderman said:

Back in September 2020, the Court granted … Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security…I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers.

The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction.


This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.

Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place.”


This blockbuster admission and revelation in the court case has the power to change the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election (revising the numbers) and setting an historic precedent to end electronic voting machines from coast to coast.

Interesting. Found a couple of articles sighting on his exact situation. I took this from the AJC, that bastion of conservative news……

It happened in a federal courtroom. It is not hypothetical conjecture or conspiracy.

Comments?
 
Last Friday in Federal Court in Atlanta, in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenburg

Huddled around a voting machine in a federal courtroom, a small crowd watched as expert witness Alex Halderman demonstrated how someone could meddle with a Georgia election within seconds manipulating the Dominion Voting machines.

Halderman, a University of Michigan computer scientist, changed results of a hypothetical referendum on Sunday alcohol sales. He flipped the winner in a theoretical election between President George Washington and Benedict Arnold, the Revolutionary War general who defected to the British. He rigged the machine to print out as many ballots as he wanted.

All he needed was a pen to reach a button inside the touchscreen, a fake $10 voter card he had programmed, or a $100 USB device that he plugged into a cord connected to a printer, rewriting the touchscreen’s code.

Professor Halderman said:

Back in September 2020, the Court granted … Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security…I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers.

The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction.


This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.

Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place.”


This blockbuster admission and revelation in the court case has the power to change the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election (revising the numbers) and setting an historic precedent to end electronic voting machines from coast to coast.

Interesting. Found a couple of articles sighting on his exact situation. I took this from the AJC, that bastion of conservative news……

It happened in a federal courtroom. It is not hypothetical conjecture or conspiracy.

Comments?
At what point should we tell our Democrat friends that the case for which this demonstration was made, was filed by Democrat voters objecting to the election of Republican Karen Handel over Jon Ossoff for 6th District US Representative in 2017?

The organization that hired the lawyers and assembled the group of Georgia voters as plaintiffs is a left wing Colorado based advocacy group, the Coalition for Good Governance.

Stacey Abrams' organization, Fair Fight Action Inc., joined the plaintiffs after her loss to Brian Kemp in the 2018 Governor's race. The judge dismissed many of Abrams' charges, but some remain.
 
Talked about in another thread but really makes you pause on why Fox settled with this company. If this exercise was performed in front of a jury fairly sure it would have led the plaintiffs to want to settle for MUCH less. Must have been some racy stuff in those emails Fox didn’t want out.
 
At what point should we tell our Democrat friends that the case for which this demonstration was made, was filed by Democrat voters objecting to the election of Republican Karen Handel over Jon Ossoff for 6th District US Representative in 2017?

The organization that hired the lawyers and assembled the group of Georgia voters as plaintiffs is a left wing Colorado based advocacy group, the Coalition for Good Governance.

Stacey Abrams' organization, Fair Fight Action Inc., joined the plaintiffs after her loss to Brian Kemp in the 2018 Governor's race. The judge dismissed many of Abrams' charges, but some remain.
I had actually forgot that, @zondawg bringing the facts….
 
Talked about in another thread but really makes you pause on why Fox settled with this company. If this exercise was performed in front of a jury fairly sure it would have led the plaintiffs to want to settle for MUCH less. Must have been some racy stuff in those emails Fox didn’t want out.
Dominion did not sue Fox for saying that their machines had security vulnerabilities. Dominion sued Fox for stating as fact a number of lies about changed votes and other conspiracies. Fox settled because Dominion had proof that Fox and their talking heads knew that they were lying at the time they broadcast the lies and the exposure of a trial would further detail to what extent Fox lies to its viewers.

Nothing that happened in the last week changes the fact that Fox was lying about changed votes. There is still zero proof that any 2020 votes were changed in GA or elsewhere.

Why Ratffensperger has chosen not to update the software and fix the security vulnerability is another question altogether and not a good look for him and the state.
 
Dominion did not sue Fox for saying that their machines had security vulnerabilities. Dominion sued Fox for stating as fact a number of lies about changed votes and other conspiracies. Fox settled because Dominion had proof that Fox and their talking heads knew that they were lying at the time they broadcast the lies and the exposure of a trial would further detail to what extent Fox lies to its viewers.

Nothing that happened in the last week changes the fact that Fox was lying about changed votes. There is still zero proof that any 2020 votes were changed in GA or elsewhere.

Why Ratffensperger has chosen not to update the software and fix the security vulnerability is another question altogether and not a good look for him and the state.
That's like saying bacteria didn't exist until Van Leeuwenhoek first observed them. Even then, the Royal Society refused to acknowledge his discovery for 4 years.

Election officials around the country are so "convinced" that their elections are clean that none have allowed anyone to check their machines after an election. If you can't look, you can't find anything.

Professor Halderman commented after the 2016 election:
"The only reason there’s no evidence of whether voting machines or vote tabulating equipment was hacked in the 2016 presidential election, Halderman insists, is because nobody allowed him or anyone else to check.
The only way to know whether a cyberattack changed the result is to closely examine the available physical evidence — paper ballots and voting equipment in critical states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania."
 
Last Friday in Federal Court in Atlanta, in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenburg

Huddled around a voting machine in a federal courtroom, a small crowd watched as expert witness Alex Halderman demonstrated how someone could meddle with a Georgia election within seconds manipulating the Dominion Voting machines.

Halderman, a University of Michigan computer scientist, changed results of a hypothetical referendum on Sunday alcohol sales. He flipped the winner in a theoretical election between President George Washington and Benedict Arnold, the Revolutionary War general who defected to the British. He rigged the machine to print out as many ballots as he wanted.

All he needed was a pen to reach a button inside the touchscreen, a fake $10 voter card he had programmed, or a $100 USB device that he plugged into a cord connected to a printer, rewriting the touchscreen’s code.

Professor Halderman said:

Back in September 2020, the Court granted … Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security…I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers.

The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction.


This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.

Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place.”


This blockbuster admission and revelation in the court case has the power to change the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election (revising the numbers) and setting an historic precedent to end electronic voting machines from coast to coast.

Interesting. Found a couple of articles sighting on his exact situation. I took this from the AJC, that bastion of conservative news……

It happened in a federal courtroom. It is not hypothetical conjecture or conspiracy.

Comments?
Remember that Brian Kemp bought these machines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg 'n IT
Remember that Brian Kemp bought these machines.
It doesn’t matter who bought them. He wasn’t the only one. It speaks to both the 2016 and 2020 elections. Which is what kills this ridiculous line of thinking. From you , Will and others. The Dems brought this case. Because the machines are apparently fubared. It took too long to get in front of a judge. Why? Because no one wants to admit in either election, things could have been wrong.

Does it make you feel better to know this is technically about 2016 and 2020, or is being proven right more important. Damn nation guys.

Like I said, I don’t know if there is provable fraud. Don’t even care. But secure elections are the most important end game. 100 percent voting in so many counties during a pandemic. Just isn’t likely. If these machines can be hacked easily, should we find out if this happened in 16 or 20. Wtf
 
That's like saying bacteria didn't exist until Van Leeuwenhoek first observed them. Even then, the Royal Society refused to acknowledge his discovery for 4 years.

Election officials around the country are so "convinced" that their elections are clean that none have allowed anyone to check their machines after an election. If you can't look, you can't find anything.

Professor Halderman commented after the 2016 election:
"The only reason there’s no evidence of whether voting machines or vote tabulating equipment was hacked in the 2016 presidential election, Halderman insists, is because nobody allowed him or anyone else to check.
The only way to know whether a cyberattack changed the result is to closely examine the available physical evidence — paper ballots and voting equipment in critical states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania."
This is the most frustrating thing: This (should be) a bipartisan issue. But, the Trump/J6 Tribalism prevents many from admitting there are issues that need to be addressed.
 
"Our elections will be modeled after the US state of Georgia. Every vote is counted. At least once."
GettyImages-2633335-e1702491938760.jpg
 
Last edited:
Last Friday in Federal Court in Atlanta, in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenburg

Huddled around a voting machine in a federal courtroom, a small crowd watched as expert witness Alex Halderman demonstrated how someone could meddle with a Georgia election within seconds manipulating the Dominion Voting machines.

Halderman, a University of Michigan computer scientist, changed results of a hypothetical referendum on Sunday alcohol sales. He flipped the winner in a theoretical election between President George Washington and Benedict Arnold, the Revolutionary War general who defected to the British. He rigged the machine to print out as many ballots as he wanted.

All he needed was a pen to reach a button inside the touchscreen, a fake $10 voter card he had programmed, or a $100 USB device that he plugged into a cord connected to a printer, rewriting the touchscreen’s code.

Professor Halderman said:

Back in September 2020, the Court granted … Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security…I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers.

The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction.


This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.

Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place.”


This blockbuster admission and revelation in the court case has the power to change the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election (revising the numbers) and setting an historic precedent to end electronic voting machines from coast to coast.

Interesting. Found a couple of articles sighting on his exact situation. I took this from the AJC, that bastion of conservative news……

It happened in a federal courtroom. It is not hypothetical conjecture or conspiracy.

Comments?
Dominion did not sue Fox for saying that their machines had security vulnerabilities. Dominion sued Fox for stating as fact a number of lies about changed votes and other conspiracies. Fox settled because Dominion had proof that Fox and their talking heads knew that they were lying at the time they broadcast the lies and the exposure of a trial would further detail to what extent Fox lies to its viewers.

Nothing that happened in the last week changes the fact that Fox was lying about changed votes. There is still zero proof that any 2020 votes were changed in GA or elsewhere.

Why Ratffensperger has chosen not to update the software and fix the security vulnerability is another question altogether and not a good look for him and the state.
It blows my mind that he was re-elected, how can voters be so blind? Hid results of 2020 findings for 2 years.
 
Willie, you left out this part of the AJC article:

"Under questioning from attorneys defending Georgia’s Dominion voting equipment, Halderman said there’s no evidence that the vulnerabilities he showed have ever been exploited in an actual election."

The tricks that Halderman did in the courtroom would be impossible to perform in the real world, in an actual voting precinct. You'd get caught, and you'd go to jail.
 
Dominion did not sue Fox for saying that their machines had security vulnerabilities. Dominion sued Fox for stating as fact a number of lies about changed votes and other conspiracies. Fox settled because Dominion had proof that Fox and their talking heads knew that they were lying at the time they broadcast the lies and the exposure of a trial would further detail to what extent Fox lies to its viewers.

Nothing that happened in the last week changes the fact that Fox was lying about changed votes. There is still zero proof that any 2020 votes were changed in GA or elsewhere.

Why Ratffensperger has chosen not to update the software and fix the security vulnerability is another question altogether and not a good look for him and the state.
Cracking Up Lol GIF by Rodney Dangerfield
 
  • Like
Reactions: seatonsdawgs
Willie, you left out this part of the AJC article:

"Under questioning from attorneys defending Georgia’s Dominion voting equipment, Halderman said there’s no evidence that the vulnerabilities he showed have ever been exploited in an actual election."

The tricks that Halderman did in the courtroom would be impossible to perform in the real world, in an actual voting precinct. You'd get caught, and you'd go to jail.
Dear lord man. Really. That is great. We got away with an election where no one tested the vulnerabilities of the machines. You can say, I was right. Trump lost see. But what you fail to mention in your spin, is they weren’t tested to even see if a cyber attack had been performed on them. There is no evidence. For sure. But he showed how easy it would be to do. WHO said it would be impossible to do in the real world. Go to jail? Only if there isn’t a conspiracy. Pretty sure if someone wants to change votes, there will be a conspiracy. Just common sense.

But hey, nothing to see here. Move along. I can’t have someone thinking trump really won. Even if this whole deal was brought to the table by democrats. 🤦‍♂️ damn he owns you guys.

Did you notice how little coverage this received? I wonder why. That is easily the most damning for any spin you might have. Even big stace acts like she wasn’t involved with this now
 
Willie, you left out this part of the AJC article:

"Under questioning from attorneys defending Georgia’s Dominion voting equipment, Halderman said there’s no evidence that the vulnerabilities he showed have ever been exploited in an actual election."

The tricks that Halderman did in the courtroom would be impossible to perform in the real world, in an actual voting precinct. You'd get caught, and you'd go to jail.
It would be a piece of cake to do after the polls closed. Like what happened in Atlanta after the "water main break" , or like in Arizona where it seems to take them 3 days to do and what other states can do in 3 hours ( Florida comes to mind).
 
Last Friday in Federal Court in Atlanta, in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenburg

Huddled around a voting machine in a federal courtroom, a small crowd watched as expert witness Alex Halderman demonstrated how someone could meddle with a Georgia election within seconds manipulating the Dominion Voting machines.

Halderman, a University of Michigan computer scientist, changed results of a hypothetical referendum on Sunday alcohol sales. He flipped the winner in a theoretical election between President George Washington and Benedict Arnold, the Revolutionary War general who defected to the British. He rigged the machine to print out as many ballots as he wanted.

All he needed was a pen to reach a button inside the touchscreen, a fake $10 voter card he had programmed, or a $100 USB device that he plugged into a cord connected to a printer, rewriting the touchscreen’s code.

Professor Halderman said:

Back in September 2020, the Court granted … Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security…I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers.

The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction.


This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.

Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place.”


This blockbuster admission and revelation in the court case has the power to change the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election (revising the numbers) and setting an historic precedent to end electronic voting machines from coast to coast.

Interesting. Found a couple of articles sighting on his exact situation. I took this from the AJC, that bastion of conservative news……

It happened in a federal courtroom. It is not hypothetical conjecture or conspiracy.

Comments?
Disgusting!
 
Dear lord man. Really. That is great. We got away with an election where no one tested the vulnerabilities of the machines. You can say, I was right. Trump lost see. But what you fail to mention in your spin, is they weren’t tested to even see if a cyber attack had been performed on them. There is no evidence. For sure. But he showed how easy it would be to do. WHO said it would be impossible to do in the real world. Go to jail? Only if there isn’t a conspiracy. Pretty sure if someone wants to change votes, there will be a conspiracy. Just common sense.

But hey, nothing to see here. Move along. I can’t have someone thinking trump really won. Even if this whole deal was brought to the table by democrats. 🤦‍♂️ damn he owns you guys.

Did you notice how little coverage this received? I wonder why. That is easily the most damning for any spin you might have. Even big stace acts like she wasn’t involved with this now
 
Dear lord man. Really. That is great. We got away with an election where no one tested the vulnerabilities of the machines. You can say, I was right. Trump lost see. But what you fail to mention in your spin, is they weren’t tested to even see if a cyber attack had been performed on them. There is no evidence. For sure. But he showed how easy it would be to do. WHO said it would be impossible to do in the real world. Go to jail? Only if there isn’t a conspiracy. Pretty sure if someone wants to change votes, there will be a conspiracy. Just common sense.

But hey, nothing to see here. Move along. I can’t have someone thinking trump really won. Even if this whole deal was brought to the table by democrats. 🤦‍♂️ damn he owns you guys.

Did you notice how little coverage this received? I wonder why. That is easily the most damning for any spin you might have. Even big stace acts like she wasn’t involved with this now
You hit the nail on the head. This country deserves HONEST elections, why not do everything possible to see that it happens. We have a tainted Secretary of State, probably paid off and how many other politicians are involved. MONEY talks.
 
Dominion did not sue Fox for saying that their machines had security vulnerabilities. Dominion sued Fox for stating as fact a number of lies about changed votes and other conspiracies. Fox settled because Dominion had proof that Fox and their talking heads knew that they were lying at the time they broadcast the lies and the exposure of a trial would further detail to what extent Fox lies to its viewers.

Nothing that happened in the last week changes the fact that Fox was lying about changed votes. There is still zero proof that any 2020 votes were changed in GA or elsewhere.

Why Ratffensperger has chosen not to update the software and fix the security vulnerability is another question altogether and not a good look for him and the state.
No real
Dominion did not sue Fox for saying that their machines had security vulnerabilities. Dominion sued Fox for stating as fact a number of lies about changed votes and other conspiracies. Fox settled because Dominion had proof that Fox and their talking heads knew that they were lying at the time they broadcast the lies and the exposure of a trial would further detail to what extent Fox lies to its viewers.

Nothing that happened in the last week changes the fact that Fox was lying about changed votes. There is still zero proof that any 2020 votes were changed in GA or elsewhere.

Why Ratffensperger has chosen not to update the software and fix the security vulnerability is another question altogether and not a good look for him and the state.
I have no affection for Fox News, but if a voting system is shown to be very vulnerable to hacking, I think it would be reasonable for some “conspiracy theories” as they are called to become more plausible and yes I think that would impact a jury verdict, especially with amount. Regardless, my thought has always been the absentee ballot harvesting and lack of proper verification there of was off the chain in 2020 and was primary tool used by the democrats. I think it flipped Georgia, not sure about other states as margins were bigger. I suspect this same trick will be used in 2024 is why I am skeptical Trump can win in PA, Michigan or Wisconsin.
 
I wasn't confident in the integrity of the 2020 election, days after the vote. Three years later, I'm still not. And I confess I have zero evidence that anyone tampered with the results in Georgia or other states. I didn't think the election should have been overturned, etc. But look..... Joe Biden got more votes than any candidate in history, without even campaigning. I'll go to my grave believing there was some funny stuff that took place.

I don't know how. I can't prove it. But I believe it. I believe it because what happened defied all common sense.

Trump beat Hillary, who was a SHOE IN to win.......But then, as an incumbent, lost to Joe Freakin' Biden? Joe Biden, with his basement hiding campaign, history of gaffes, lack of accomplishments, and tendency to creep on young girls?

I'll never believe it was legit.
 
Secretary of State, Raffensperger is a snake in the grass.
Secretary of State Raffensperger is a lifelong Republican who defended your vote and mine from the man who tried to steal the 2020 election, President Donald Trump.

I wasn't confident in the integrity of the 2020 election, days after the vote. Three years later, I'm still not. And I confess I have zero evidence that anyone tampered with the results in Georgia or other states. I didn't think the election should have been overturned, etc. But look..... Joe Biden got more votes than any candidate in history, without even campaigning. I'll go to my grave believing there was some funny stuff that took place.

I don't know how. I can't prove it. But I believe it. I believe it because what happened defied all common sense.

Trump beat Hillary, who was a SHOE IN to win.......But then, as an incumbent, lost to Joe Freakin' Biden? Joe Biden, with his basement hiding campaign, history of gaffes, lack of accomplishments, and tendency to creep on young girls?

I'll never believe it was legit.
Preacher, how can you say you'll never believe the election was legit, when you admit you have zero evidence that anyone tampered with the results? This is what I absolutely don't understand, how intelligent people can admit that they know there's no proof, but they still believe.

To me, there's all kinds of proof that Trump made every effort to steal the 2020 election. "I just need to find 11,780 votes, be there, will be wild, fight like hell or you won't have a country any more, Pence didn't have the courage, well Kevin I guess these people are more upset than you are"--all that and much much more gets ignored.
 
Secretary of State Raffensperger is a lifelong Republican who defended your vote and mine from the man who tried to steal the 2020 election, President Donald Trump.


Preacher, how can you say you'll never believe the election was legit, when you admit you have zero evidence that anyone tampered with the results? This is what I absolutely don't understand, how intelligent people can admit that they know there's no proof, but they still believe.

To me, there's all kinds of proof that Trump made every effort to steal the 2020 election. "I just need to find 11,780 votes, be there, will be wild, fight like hell or you won't have a country any more, Pence didn't have the courage, well Kevin I guess these people are more upset than you are"--all that and much much more gets ignored.
The same things were said in Jonestown.....
 
Secretary of State Raffensperger is a lifelong Republican who defended your vote and mine from the man who tried to steal the 2020 election, President Donald Trump.


Preacher, how can you say you'll never believe the election was legit, when you admit you have zero evidence that anyone tampered with the results? This is what I absolutely don't understand, how intelligent people can admit that they know there's no proof, but they still believe.

To me, there's all kinds of proof that Trump made every effort to steal the 2020 election. "I just need to find 11,780 votes, be there, will be wild, fight like hell or you won't have a country any more, Pence didn't have the courage, well Kevin I guess these people are more upset than you are"--all that and much much more gets ignored.

I believe lots of things without proof.
 
Willie, you left out this part of the AJC article:

"Under questioning from attorneys defending Georgia’s Dominion voting equipment, Halderman said there’s no evidence that the vulnerabilities he showed have ever been exploited in an actual election."

The tricks that Halderman did in the courtroom would be impossible to perform in the real world, in an actual voting precinct. You'd get caught, and you'd go to jail.
In a court of law, no evidence has been legally accepted that the vulnerabilities have been exploited in an actual election.

If so, people would be in jail.

What tricks did Halderman do? He hacked a Dominion machine in front of a judge. Are we to assume that others can’t, wouldn’t, didn’t manipulate the machines?

My question would be why the hacks would be impossible in the “real” world. The real world spends billions a year hacking everything from banks, governments and aunt Martha’s savings.

There isn’t a machine in the world that can’t be hacked. And that is the rub. But we are somehow told to back down and believe that every person who handled the info, gathered, transmitted, monitored, and “protected” the ballots cast are ethically and morally stable.

There isn’t a hacker out there that couldn’t manipulate the machines. Again, that is the rub.

We won’t do the most obvious things to tabulate a citizens vote. Instead, we create a system that is impossible to oversee.

Our system invites ideological agendas to manipulate the vote for the perceived good of the supported agenda. Much like religious zealots, political agenda and money drives men to do illegal things.

Few are going to jail because the system is built to not get caught.

The two systems that make no sense are NIL/portal and our election system. Either no rules or such a flagrant disregard for common procedures, why should we be surprised?

1) Prove you are the registered voter at time of vote.

Period
 
Willie, you left out this part of the AJC article:

"Under questioning from attorneys defending Georgia’s Dominion voting equipment, Halderman said there’s no evidence that the vulnerabilities he showed have ever been exploited in an actual election."

The tricks that Halderman did in the courtroom would be impossible to perform in the real world, in an actual voting precinct. You'd get caught, and you'd go to jail.
Impossible to do? Really? All you need is a water pipe to bust so you can run everyone off to commit the crime. Pretty simple actually
 
Willie, you left out this part of the AJC article:

"Under questioning from attorneys defending Georgia’s Dominion voting equipment, Halderman said there’s no evidence that the vulnerabilities he showed have ever been exploited in an actual election."

The tricks that Halderman did in the courtroom would be impossible to perform in the real world, in an actual voting precinct. You'd get caught, and you'd go to jail.
Do you not realize how this makes you look. You and will either think everyone else is really stupid or well you figure it out. I might get sent to Punta Arenas if I tell you.
 
Secretary of State Raffensperger is a lifelong Republican who defended your vote and mine from the man who tried to steal the 2020 election, President Donald Trump.


Preacher, how can you say you'll never believe the election was legit, when you admit you have zero evidence that anyone tampered with the results? This is what I absolutely don't understand, how intelligent people can admit that they know there's no proof, but they still believe.

To me, there's all kinds of proof that Trump made every effort to steal the 2020 election. "I just need to find 11,780 votes, be there, will be wild, fight like hell or you won't have a country any more, Pence didn't have the courage, well Kevin I guess these people are more upset than you are"--all that and much much more gets ignored.
You believe all kinds of lies. You repeat them on here all the time. Biden is great, the border is secure, the vax is safe Trump colluded with Russia. Btw. Would you show us your proof?????!? And Adam schiffless too???
 
Remember that Brian Kemp bought these machines.
We know quite well. I will go you one better.

The SoS was ordered by Judge Amy Totenberg, the judge in the case we are discussing, to replace the outdated election system in Georgia. The state was using a system originally sold by Diebold, under the Premier Systems label.

Diebold sold their Premier subsidiary to ES&S, which was at the time the largest vendor of election systems in the US, in 2009. ES&S was sued over the acquisition on the grounds it would give them too large a market share. ES&S sold Premier to Dominion Voting Systems in 2010.

Dominion has operated Premier's legacy systems and provided software updates since then. Dominion also incorporated the Premier technology into their ImageCast ballot marking devices.

When Georgia chose the current system, they looked mainly at the newest version of the Premier system and the latest version of Dominion's ImageCast. Both products from the same vendor. The configuration they bought of the Dominion ImageCast system is designed to work the same way as the system they replaced.
 
Last Friday in Federal Court in Atlanta, in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenburg

Huddled around a voting machine in a federal courtroom, a small crowd watched as expert witness Alex Halderman demonstrated how someone could meddle with a Georgia election within seconds manipulating the Dominion Voting machines.

Halderman, a University of Michigan computer scientist, changed results of a hypothetical referendum on Sunday alcohol sales. He flipped the winner in a theoretical election between President George Washington and Benedict Arnold, the Revolutionary War general who defected to the British. He rigged the machine to print out as many ballots as he wanted.

All he needed was a pen to reach a button inside the touchscreen, a fake $10 voter card he had programmed, or a $100 USB device that he plugged into a cord connected to a printer, rewriting the touchscreen’s code.

Professor Halderman said:

Back in September 2020, the Court granted … Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security…I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers.

The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction.


This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.

Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place.”


This blockbuster admission and revelation in the court case has the power to change the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election (revising the numbers) and setting an historic precedent to end electronic voting machines from coast to coast.

Interesting. Found a couple of articles sighting on his exact situation. I took this from the AJC, that bastion of conservative news……

It happened in a federal courtroom. It is not hypothetical conjecture or conspiracy.

Comments?
So Kemp wasn't really elected?
 
So Kemp wasn't really elected?
Stacey Abrams had some valid complaints. Have you seen the HBO documentary Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections? There's a segment devoted to the 2018 Georgia governor's race. Brings up some good points.
 
Stacey Abrams had some valid complaints. Have you seen the HBO documentary Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections? There's a segment devoted to the 2018 Georgia governor's race. Brings up some good points.
I'll try to check it out. We may need to change how we vote, but just saying a voting machine can be hacked is not equal to saying it was hacked. You would have to have proof. The proof is what has been missing in almost every cry of election fraud (2020 and the others before it). Without proof it's equivalent to saying a person could have murdered someone (opportunity) so they must have murdered someone (act).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chopdawg75
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT